Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

La84 Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.0M
Granted FY2024still arriving
60
Grants FY2024still arriving
3
States reached
$750k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Recreation & Sports$16MYouth Development$7.6MEducation$3.4MScience & Tech$3.0MHuman Services$1.7MPhilanthropy$1.1MCommunity Improvement$470kHealth$259kOther$0
02FY2024 · 60 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k28 grants · $770k
  • $50k–250k28 grants · $2.7M
  • $250k+4 grants · $1.6M
$50,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$186M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION$750,000
Individual grant recipient$300,000
VANGUARD CHARITABLE$259,000
LA'S BEST AFTERSCHOOL ENRICHMENT PROGRAM$250,000
PLAYWORKS$225,000
LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION$175,000
BEST STEP FORWARD$160,000
STUDENTS RUN AMERICA DBA STUDENTS RUN LA$150,000
UP2US SPORTS$150,000
ACCESS YOUTH ACADEMY$150,000
BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS CARSON$125,000
STREET SOCCER USA INC$125,000
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION$125,000
HEART OF LOS ANGELES (HOLA) YOUTH INC$100,000
INTER TRIBAL SPORTS$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $2.4M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STREET SOCCER USA INC: $125k → 17%EXPOSURE SKATE: $10k → 10%BEST STEP FORWARD: $160k → 21%STREET SOCCER USA INC: $100k → 17%STREET SOCCER USA INC: $75k → 17%STREET SOCCER USA INC: $38k → 17%PARTNERS THERAPEUTIC HORSEMANSHIP: $20k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES FOUNDATION: $125k → 11%CHALLENGED ATHLETES INC: $49k → 11%OCEANSIDE IVEY RANCH PARK ASSOCIATION: $25k → 11%MONTEBELLO POLICE ATHLETICS & ACTIVITIES LEAGUE: $10k → 14%ANGEL CITY ALLIANCE: $50k → 14%ANGEL CITY ALLIANCE: $35k → 14%ANGEL CITY ALLIANCE: $30k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $30k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $75k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $75k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $45k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $40k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $25k → 14%CATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC: $10k → 14%SPECIAL NEEDS NETWORK INC: $30k → 14%WHY CAN'T WE MAKE A DIFFERENCE: $34k → 14%TOBERMAN NEIGHBORHOOD CENTER: $10k → 14%EL CENTRO DEL PUEBLO: $30k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL AKA JESUIT HISPANO MINISTRY: $55k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $50k → 14%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH: $75k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $40k → 14%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH: $75k → 14%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH: $75k → 14%PROYECTO PASTORAL: $35k → 14%ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER: $50k → 14%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH: $25k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $35k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $20k → 14%TAKING THE REINS: $20k → 14%ALL PEOPLES COMMUNITY CENTER: $25k → 14%WEINGART EAST LOS ANGELES YMCA: $25k → 14%JUST US 4 YOUTH: $10k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $275k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $75k → 14%BEAT THE STREETS-LOS ANGELES INC: $50k → 14%BEAT THE STREETS-LOS ANGELES INC: $50k → 14%BEAT THE STREETS-LOS ANGELES INC: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$27M · 105 repeat orgs$3.2M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +60% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.

105 repeat relationships — 46 still active in FY2024, 59 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

105
97

Total granted

$27M
$2.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+60%
+30%

Still filing today

73%
49%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $695k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Youth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsHuman ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION
    4× · 2020–2024 · $3.0M · revenue +62%
  • TP
    THE PLAY EQUITY FUND
    3× · 2019–2022 · $2.7M · revenue ×26 · 27% of their budget
  • TT
    THINK TOGETHER
    6× · 2018–2023 · $1.6M · revenue +365%

Funded once

  • LTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $150k · revenue +78%
  • TS
    THE SALVATION ARMY
    one grant, 2018 · $100k
  • CO
    CITY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF RECREATION AND PARKS
    one grant, 2022 · $85k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Southwest Riverside County Youth Sports Coalition Corp

It is the mission of srcysc to provide the youth of riverside county with equal opportunities for those of all genders and ages to engage and take active part in personal fitness, teamwork, athletic competition and self esteem building…

Recreation & Sports
2
So Cal Aces Baseball Club

Youth sports

Religion
3
Los Angeles Bulls Soccer Club

Support, educate, organize, administrate and develop southern california youth to achieve their highest potential through the game of soccer.

Recreation & Sports
4
California Magic Sc

California Magic SC is a community-based club whose mission is to educate, inspire,and empower youth in a positive way through the beautiful game of soccer.While this small and select club is committed to high achievement in soccer,the…

Recreation & Sports
5
Boys & Girls Club of Pasadena

We enable children and youth in the community, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, healthy, and responsible citizens.

Youth Development
6
The Los Angeles County Alliance for Boys and Girls Clubs

The alliance was established to support the 23 clubs in the los angeles county by securing resources and marketing the boys and girls clubs to support the efforts of each individual club to increase their impact and outreach.

—
7
Santa Barbara Soccer Club

Provides youth soccer development and amateur athletic competition through coaching, training and competition.

Recreation & Sports
8
Boys & Girls Club of San Fernando Valley

Boys and girls clubs provide a safe place for youth to develop character, leadership, education, career guidance, health, art, sports and fitness while becoming responsible and caring citizens.

—
9
Boys & Girls Club of Laguna Beach

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to realize their full potential as healthy, caring, and responsible adults.

Youth Development
10
Boys and Girls Club of Hollywood Inc

Boys and girls club of hollywood provides educational programs in diverse subjects that are focused on providing structured learning to the children of our community.

Youth Development
11
Los Angeles Sports Council Foundation

Our mission statement is to promote youth athletics through activities and events that are educational and charitable. the la sports council foundation also supports the mission of the la sports council, which is to drive positive impact…

Unclassified
12
Boys & Girls Club of La Plata County Inc

To enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as productive, caring, responsible citizens.

Youth Development

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is After-School All-Stars Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Orange County Makapo Aquatics Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and Rehabilit…Faith-Based Community Servi…Performing Arts Organizatio…School Parent Support Organ…Environmental Advocacy & Po…Community Health CentersDevelopmental Disabilities …Youth Sports & Recreation P…University Support Organiza…Charter SchoolsFamily & Youth Support Serv…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%1%<5yr16%11%5–10yr20%22%10–20yr17%31%20–35yr10%15%35–55yr12%20%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%1%<5yr16%6%5–10yr20%24%10–20yr17%39%20–35yr10%9%35–55yr12%22%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%5/164
the rest of the field
15%
12,083/79,711

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

150 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 150 of the 219 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

12
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
42
Early backer (in before they grew)
140/150
Grantees still filing
110/150
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LAUSDBEYOND THE BELL BRANCH — $1,129,317 · OtherLAUSDBEYOND THE BELL BRANCHIndividual grant recipient — $1,055,416 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT OF PARKS AND RECREATION — $1,018,646 · OtherCOUNTY OF LOS ANGELES DEPARTMENT…+95 more — $5,705,105 · Other+95 moreTHE PLAY EQUITY FUND — $2,700,000 · EducationTHE PLAY EQUITY FUNDTHINK TOGETHER — $1,621,288 · EducationTHINK TOGETHERLA'S BEST — $1,450,000 · EducationLA'S BESTMORONGO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 · EducationMORONGO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDA…MT SAN ANTONIO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $300,000 · Education+12 more — $722,257 · Education+12 moreSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA — $775,000 · Youth DevelopmentSTUDENTS RUN AMERI…PLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED — $680,000 · Youth DevelopmentPLAYWORKS EDUCATIO…HEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $385,000 · Youth DevelopmentHEART OF LOS ANGEL…SCIENCE OF SPORT — $330,000 · Youth DevelopmentSCIENCE OF SPORTBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON INC — $312,500 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUB …THE GRYD FOUNDATION — $250,000 · Youth DevelopmentACCESS YOUTH ACADEMY — $220,000 · Youth DevelopmentCALIFORNIA STATE SOCCER ASSOC SOUTH — $215,826 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR — $182,700 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO LOS ANGELES — $180,000 · Youth Development+27 more — $1,371,250 · Youth Development+27 moreLULU'S PLACE INC — $1,000,000 · Recreation & SportsLULU'S PLACE …THE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION — $810,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE LOS ANGEL…THE SCGA FOUNDATION — $218,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE SCGA FOUN…LOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION — $215,000 · Recreation & SportsLOS ANGELES P…UP2US INC — $205,000 · Recreation & SportsUP2US INCInter Tribal Sports Inc — $175,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $150,000 · Recreation & SportsAMERICA SCORES LA — $137,500 · Recreation & SportsSLOANE STEPHENS FOUNDATION INC — $129,000 · Recreation & Sports+13 more — $581,125 · Recreation & Sports+13 moreCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION — $3,000,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA …Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $405,000 · Human ServicesSTREET SOCCER USA INC — $337,500 · Human ServicesCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC — $270,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH — $250,000 · Human ServicesProyecto Pastoral — $180,000 · Human ServicesCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $174,000 · Human ServicesBEST STEP FORWARD — $160,000 · Human ServicesBEAT THE STREETS - LOS ANGELES INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesAngel City Alliance — $115,000 · Human Services+11 more — $328,675 · Human ServicesSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $269,200 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $259,000 · PhilanthropyORANGE COUNTY MAKAPO AQUATICS PROJECT — $59,000 · PhilanthropyAWOKE — $30,000 · PhilanthropyCALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Philanthropy
Other$8,908,484Education$7,293,545Youth Development$4,902,276Recreation & Sports$3,620,625Arts & Culture$3,000,000Human Services$2,370,175Philanthropy$642,200

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION — $3,000,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTHE PLAY EQUITY FUND — $2,700,000 over 3y, 27% of budgetTHINK TOGETHER — $1,621,288 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetLA'S BEST — $1,450,000 over 5y, 5.5% of budgetLULU'S PLACE INC — $1,000,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES DODGERS FOUNDATION — $810,000 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetSTUDENTS RUN AMERICA — $775,000 over 6y, 7.3% of budgetPLAYWORKS EDUCATION ENERGIZED — $680,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetMORONGO EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC — $500,000 over 2y, 98% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $405,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetHEART OF LOS ANGELES YOUTH INC — $385,000 over 5y, 2.3% of budgetSTREET SOCCER USA INC — $337,500 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetSCIENCE OF SPORT — $330,000 over 4y, 11% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CARSON INC — $312,500 over 4y, 2.8% of budgetMT SAN ANTONIO COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $300,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetROSE BOWL AQUATICS CENTER — $290,520 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetWOODCRAFT RANGERS — $275,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF LOS ANGELES INC — $270,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA TENNIS ASSOCIATION FOUNDATION — $269,200 over 3y, 20% of budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $259,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER LONG BEACH — $250,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE GRYD FOUNDATION — $250,000 over 3y, 9.2% of budgetACCESS YOUTH ACADEMY — $220,000 over 3y, 8.4% of budgetTHE SCGA FOUNDATION — $218,000 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA STATE SOCCER ASSOC SOUTH — $215,826 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PARKS FOUNDATION — $215,000 over 3y, 4.4% of budgetUP2US INC — $205,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetA PLACE CALLED HOME — $200,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF LOS ANGELES HARBOR — $182,700 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetProyecto Pastoral — $180,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO LOS ANGELES — $180,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetInter Tribal Sports Inc — $175,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetPF Bresee Foundation — $175,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetCHALLENGED ATHLETES INC — $174,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of West San Gabriel Valley — $170,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetFRIENDS OF EXPO CENTER — $161,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetBEST STEP FORWARD — $160,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetLA PROMISE FUND — $150,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA INC — $150,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetLTSC COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION — $150,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetBEAT THE STREETS - LOS ANGELES INC — $150,000 over 3y, 5.9% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF WHITTIER INC — $140,000 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetAMERICA SCORES LA — $137,500 over 3y, 33% of budgetACEING AUTISM INC — $136,400 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetVARIETY BOYS & GIRLS CLUB — $136,000 over 3y, 2.2% of budgetPOSITIVE COACHING ALLIANCE — $132,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetYOUTH N MOTION ACADEMY INCORPORATED — $129,500 over 5y, 48% of budgetSLOANE STEPHENS FOUNDATION INC — $129,000 over 3y, 12% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Play Equity FundThe Rose Hills Founda…Weingart FoundationThe Ralph M Parsons F…The Ahmanson Foundati…California Community …The Green FoundationKaiser Foundation Hos…The Annenberg Foundat…Elbridge Stuart Found…Great Public Schools …The Los Angeles Dodge…
The Play Equity FundCA62.3× affinity28 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Play Equity Fund · The Rose Hills Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · California Community Foundation · The Green Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · The Annenberg Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Great Public Schools Now · The Los Angeles Dodgers Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization La84 Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    64report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 219 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines