· Private foundation
The Telluray Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k17 grants · $57k
- $10k–50k13 grants · $354k
- $50k–250k19 grants · $1.7M
- $250k+2 grants · $759k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL COLORADO FOUNDATION | $500,000 |
| CRAIG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $259,031 |
| LITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $164,728 |
| NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION | $150,000 |
| LITTLETON TOWN HALL ARTS CENTER | $150,000 |
| LITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION | $116,571 |
| MULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES | $100,000 |
| TACT KIDS INC | $100,000 |
| BRIDGE HOUSE | $100,000 |
| AMBLESIDE SCHOOL OF COLORADO | $100,000 |
| SOUTH SUBURBAN PARKS AND RECREATION | $87,600 |
| ARAPAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $80,246 |
| DENVER URBAN GARDENS | $75,000 |
| INVEST IN KIDS | $64,106 |
| TROUT UNLIMITED | $64,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 48% of The Telluray Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
54 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2024, 25 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $913k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHChildren's Hospital Colorado Foundation6× · 2018–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +37%
- LPLITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION6× · 2018–2024 · $1.1M · revenue +166% · 58% of their budget
- NFNATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION5× · 2018–2024 · $757k · revenue +460%
Funded once
- HLHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCYgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $638k · revenue +142% · 31% of their budget
- BGBig Greenone grant, 2018 · $300k · revenue -29%
- HGHUDSON GARDENS (KING C HUDSON AND EVELYN LEIGH HUDSON FOUNDATION)one grant, 2020 · $250k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.
Provide opportunities for all to thrive by offering free food resources to communities.
To provide food to all in need through community partnerships and hunger relief programs. Our vision is a hunger-free Larimer County.
Colorado Thrives exists to support Coloradans to achieve economic mobility through access to good jobs.
Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…
To provide timely, credible and accessible analyses of fiscal and economic issues facing colorado to inform public policy debates and promote economic prosperity
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
Colorado nonprofit association strengthens colorado's nonprofits through education, connection and advocacy.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Ouray Mountain Rescue Team Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
94 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 94 of the 128 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds DONOR ADVISED CHARITABLE GIVING INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds DENVER BOTANIC GARDENS INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLETON PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOREST FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
- Who funds MULTIDISCIPLINARY ASSOCIATION FOR PSYCHEDELIC STUDIES INC ↗
- Who funds LITTLETON TOWN HALL ARTS CENTER ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL WILDLIFE FEDERATION ↗
- Who funds COLORADO ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NOURISH COLORADO ↗
- Who funds MI CASA RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds ARAPAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds REACH OUT AND READ COLORADO ↗
- Who funds Big Green ↗
- Who funds CASA OF THE SEVENTH JUDICIAL DISTRICT INC ↗
- Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds THE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds DENVER URBAN GARDENS ↗
- Who funds TACT KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSPURPOSE ↗
- Who funds COLORADO WATER TRUST ↗
- Who funds MILE HIGH MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds ENVIRONMENTAL DEFENSE FUND INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds WORK OPTIONS FOR WOMEN DBA WORK OPTIONS ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL TRUST FOR LOCAL NEWS ↗
- Who funds OURAY ICE PARK INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Daniels Fund · Schlessman Foundation Inc · Anschutz Family Foundation · The Anschutz Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Gary Philanthropy · Mile High United Way Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Telluray Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Telluray Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Telluray Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.