Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Silicon Valley Bank Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$788k
Granted FY2023
4
Grants FY2023
2
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2023.

Philanthropy$9.5MEducation$4.3MFood & Nutrition$1.7MCommunity Improvement$1.5MHousing & Shelter$1.3MHealth$1.0MHuman Services$868kCrime & Legal$699kOther$0
02FY2023 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2023

  • $50k–250k2 grants · $288k
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$250,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$13M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
GRAMEEN AMERICA INC$250,000
HOUSING TRUST OF SILICON VALLEY$250,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM$200,000
UK ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION$87,564
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $791k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%YOUNG MENS CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION GREATER BOSTON: $100k → 16%LYMELIGHT FOUNDATION: $3k → 7%OUR TOWN ST HELENA: $12k → 9%FORESTDALE INC: $10k → 13%WOMENS CENTER OF WAKE COUNTY INC: $3k → 8%STEPUP DURHAM: $3k → 11%FREEDOM SERVICE DOGS: $10k → 8%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATION: $14k → 12%MY BROTHERS KEEPER INC: $5k → 11%LEARNING ALLY: $20k → 11%JOHNNY MAC SOLDIERS FUND: $2k → 4%OUR TOWN ST HELENA: $10k → 9%WASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION: $50k → 14%EMERGENCY FAMILY ASSISTANCE: $8k → 12%OUR TOWN ST HELENA: $10k → 9%CANINE COMPANIONS FOR INDEPENDENCE: $5k → 11%BRAVE SPACE ALLIANCE: $5k → 14%KIDS MEALS INC: $3k → 16%WASHINGTON AREA WOMENS FOUNDATION: $25k → 14%OPEN DOORS TO FUTURE POSSIBILITIES: $500 → 8%BROWN BAG MINISTRY: $3k → 8%COMMUNITY SERVINGS: $50k → 16%INDIASPORA: $10k → 10%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $4k → 7%OPEN DOORS TO FUTURE POSSIBILITIES: $500 → 8%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS: $8k → 10%PENINSULA FAMILY SERVICE: $3k → 7%AMERICAN NATIONAL RED CROSS: $19k → 14%FENIXIA FOUNDATION INC: $5k → 7%HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC: $5k → 10%YMCA OF SILICON VALLEY: $15k → 8%SOMOS FAMILIA: $10k → 10%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $10k → 17%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $10k → 10%THE BILL WILSON CENTER: $50k → 8%NATIONAL ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION: $100k → 7%THE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD: $50k → 14%CENTER AT BLESSED SACRAMENT (THE): $10k → 14%BILL WILSON CENTER: $50k → 8%PHOENIX INDIAN CENTER: $75k → 11%SACRED HEART COMMUNITY SERVICE: $10k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
OR
NV
PA
NJ
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
DE
AZ
TN
NC
DC
LA
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 40% of The Silicon Valley Bank Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 61% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 57% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Silicon Valley Bank Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 2.5% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.1M · 60 repeat orgs$7.4M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

60 repeat relationships — 2 still active in FY2023, 58 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

60
267

Total granted

$6.1M
$7.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
+10%

Still filing today

85%
63%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $288k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesEducationHealthFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TA
    THE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND
    2× · 2021–2022 · $1.0M · revenue +25%
  • LF
    Law Foundation of Silicon Valley
    3× · 2017–2022 · $538k · revenue +19%
  • HT
    HOUSING TRUST SILICON VALLEY
    3× · 2017–2023 · $510k · revenue +418%

Funded once

  • AS
    ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2021 · $500k
  • ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $500k · revenue +53%
  • FU
    FLORIDA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2022 · $500k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Feeding San Diego

On a mission to connect every person facing hunger with nutritious meals by maximizing food rescue. through direct service and community partnerships, feeding san diego provides more than 26 million meals each year to children, families,…

Food & Nutrition
2
United Food Bank

United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.

Food & Nutrition
3
The Health Trust

The mission is to build health equity in silicon valley.

Health
4
Dress for Success San Francisco

Dress for success san francisco/san jose empowers women to achieve economic independence by providing a network of support, professional attire, and development tools to help them thrive in work and in life.

Civil Rights
5
Enterprise for Youth

Enterprise for youth empowers under-resourced san francisco youths to reach their potential through transformative paid internship experiences supported by a community of employers, caring adults, and peers.

Youth Development
6
Kqed Inc

See schedule okqed serves the people of northern california with a community-supported alternative to commercial media, providing the knowledge needed to make informed decisions; convening community dialogue; bringing the arts to everyone;…

Arts & Culture
7
Public Advocates Inc

For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…

—
8
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
9
Community Foundation Santa Cruz County

To promote philanthropy to make santa cruz county a better place to live, now and in the future.we bring together people, ideas, and resources to inspire philanthropy and accomplish great things.

Philanthropy
10
Coop Careers Inc

Building a movement of diverse, upwardly mobile college grads overcoming underemployment through digital skills and peer connections.

Education
11
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
12
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The San Diego Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Kyrene de La Mariposa Pto. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsFood Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyYouth Development ServicesLgbtq+ Community SupportJewish Community Organizati…Affordable Housing Developm…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Women & Girls Leadership De…Addiction Recovery ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Immigrant Worker SupportElementary Literacy TutoringMilitary Veterans SupportCancer Support ServicesSchool District FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesSenior Support ServicesCommunity Arts CentersAnimal Rescue and ShelterCommunity Food PantriesAffordable Housing Construc…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%1%<5yr15%8%5–10yr20%23%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr11%34%35–55yr13%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%11%10–20yr17%56%20–35yr11%19%35–55yr13%13%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/245
the rest of the field
14%
26,003/186,733

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

236 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 236 of the 337 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
48
Early backer (in before they grew)
228/236
Grantees still filing
147/236
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Silicon Valley Community Foundation — $8,165,936 · PhilanthropySilicon Valley Community FoundationAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $620,524 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC+11 more — $300,250 · PhilanthropyARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY — $500,000 · OtherARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITYFLORIDA UNIVERSITY — $500,000 · OtherFLORIDA UNIVERSITYFLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITY — $500,000 · OtherFLORIDA A&M UNIVERSITYMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $355,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA REINVESTMENT COALITION FBO CALIFORNIA RECOVERY FUND — $250,000 · OtherBURBANK HOUSING FBO CARITAS VILLAGE — $250,000 · OtherRise Economy — $250,000 · Other+122 more — $4,453,488 · Other+122 moreTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $1,000,000 · EducationTHE ADMINISTRA…XAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA — $1,000,000 · EducationXAVIER UNIVERS…ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $500,000 · EducationARIZONA STATE …+11 more — $213,890 · Education+11 moreGRAMEEN AMERICA INC — $500,000 · Community ImprovementTempe Community Action Agency Inc — $125,000 · Community ImprovementBUSINESSES UNITED IN INVESTING LENDING & DEVELOPMENT — $122,500 · Community ImprovementHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $30,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $50,000 · Community ImprovementBILL WILSON CENTER — $100,000 · Human ServicesPACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND FKA NATIONAL ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION — $100,000 · Human ServicesYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC — $100,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $75,000 · Human ServicesPHOENIX INDIAN CENTER INC — $75,000 · Human ServicesTHE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD — $60,000 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC — $50,000 · Human ServicesOUR TOWN ST HELENA — $31,500 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $28,750 · Human Services+13 more — $181,950 · Human ServicesHOUSING TRUST SILICON VALLEY — $510,000 · Housing & ShelterFRIENDS OF BOSTON'S HOMELESS INC — $110,000 · Housing & ShelterCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterHOUSING LEADERSHIP COUNCIL OF SAN MATEO COUNTY — $32,500 · Housing & Shelter+4 more — $58,500 · Housing & ShelterLaw Foundation of Silicon Valley — $538,000 · Crime & LegalSILICON VALLEY CAMPAIGN FOR LEGAL SERVICES — $25,000 · Crime & LegalINSIDEOUT WRITERS INC — $25,000 · Crime & LegalUTAH DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ADVISORY COUNCIL — $25,000 · Crime & Legal+3 more — $39,000 · Crime & Legal
Philanthropy$9,086,710Other$7,058,488Education$2,713,890Community Improvement$827,500Human Services$802,200Housing & Shelter$761,000Crime & Legal$652,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSilicon Valley Community Foundation — $8,165,936 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ADMINISTRATORS OF THE TULANE EDUCATIONAL FUND — $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetXAVIER UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA — $1,000,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN ONLINE GIVING FOUNDATION INC — $620,524 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLaw Foundation of Silicon Valley — $538,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetHOUSING TRUST SILICON VALLEY — $510,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGRAMEEN AMERICA INC — $500,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION FOR A NEW AMERICAN UNIVERSITY — $500,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF SAN FRANCISCO INC — $355,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetRise Economy — $250,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM — $200,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLIFEMOVES — $150,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $150,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF THE BAY AREA — $130,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALAMEDA COUNTY COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTempe Community Action Agency Inc — $125,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetFOOD BANK OF CONTRA COSTA AND SOLANO — $125,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBUSINESSES UNITED IN INVESTING LENDING & DEVELOPMENT — $122,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetINDIAN HEALTH CENTER OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY — $120,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSTARTOUT — $115,000 over 3y, 3.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF BOSTON'S HOMELESS INC — $110,000 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetBILL WILSON CENTER — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetVALLEY HEALTH FOUNDATION (VHF) — $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetPACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND FKA NATIONAL ASIAN AMERICAN COALITION — $100,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetYOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREDWOOD EMPIRE FOOD BANK — $100,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSECOND HARVEST OF SILICON VALLEY — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWASHINGTON AREA WOMEN'S FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 2y, 2.3% of budgetST MARY'S FOOD BANK ALLIANCE — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSCOTTSDALE COMMUNITY PARTNERS — $75,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budget1N10 INC — $75,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetPHOENIX INDIAN CENTER INC — $75,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE CENTER IN HOLLYWOOD — $60,000 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRaising A Reader — $50,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY SERVINGS INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHINATOWN COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT CENTER — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetLIFE SCIENCE CARES INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetKEDREN COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTERINC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetSUMMER SEARCH — $40,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $37,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Charlie Cart Project — $34,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetHOUSING LEADERSHIP COUNCIL OF SAN MATEO COUNTY — $32,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetOUR TOWN ST HELENA — $31,500 over 3y, 15% of budgetHISPANIC FEDERATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMUST — $30,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNATIONAL BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Silicon Valley Commun…The Sobrato Family Fo…The David and Lucile …The Yelp FoundationThe San Francisco Fou…Mufg Union Bank Found…Los Altos Mountain Vi…United Way of the Bay…The Wilson Sonsini Go…Sunlight GivingThe Applied Materials…Virginia G Piper Char…
Silicon Valley Community FoundationCA40.5× affinity67 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Silicon Valley Community Foundation · The Sobrato Family Foundation · The David and Lucile Packard Foundation · The Yelp Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Mufg Union Bank Foundation Ag · Los Altos Mountain View Community Foundation · United Way of the Bay Area · The Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati Foundation · Sunlight Giving · The Applied Materials Foundation · Virginia G Piper Charitable Trust

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Silicon Valley Bank Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 4%
  • Habcore Inc — 50% of income from government
  • Oregon Food Bank — 21% of income from government
  • Community Servings Inc — 12% of income from government
  • Girl Develop It — 7% of income from government
  • Best Buddies International Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Learning Ally Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Tuality Healthcare Foundation — 3% of income from government
  • The Possible Project Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
81report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Silicon Valley Bank Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Silicon Valley Bank Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 337 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record but names no grant recipient in the published copy, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines