· Private foundation
Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert Institution for Poor Boys and Girls
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $1k
- $10k–50k29 grants · $345k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $70k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WORKSHOP LEARNING | $70,000 |
| COMMUNITY COUNCIL HEALTH SYSTEMS | $44,500 |
| GEMMA SERVICES | $30,000 |
| THE PHILADELPHIA ACADEMIES | $10,000 |
| AFTER SCHOOL ACTIVITIES PARTNERSHIP | $10,000 |
| YOGA 4 THE WORLD | $10,000 |
| NEIGHBORHOOD BIKE WORKS | $10,000 |
| HARLEM LACROSSE AND LEADERSHIP CORP | $10,000 |
| POSIBILIDADES INFINITAS | $10,000 |
| LIFT EVERY VOICE PHILLY | $10,000 |
| FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN - PHILADELP | $10,000 |
| URBAIN AFFAIRS COALITION | $10,000 |
| BEYOND THE BARS | $10,000 |
| THE COMMON PLACE | $10,000 |
| PHILADELPHIA ARTS IN EDUCATION PART | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $310k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 47% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +38% since the first grant, against +30% for the ones you funded once.
70 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 57 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 36% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $266k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CBCODED BY4× · 2018–2021 · $90k · revenue +312%
- CNCENTRO NUEVA CREACION NEW CREATION COMMUNITY CENTER8× · 2017–2024 · $80k · revenue +147%
- RTROCK TO THE FUTURE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $80k · revenue +265%
Funded once
- TLTHE LIGHTHOUSEone grant, 2022 · $60k · revenue +9%
- ISInner Strength Educationone grant, 2024 · $60k
- LILIGUORI INCgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $58k · revenue +30%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Education, arts and culture.
To help young people and their families enhance their innate ability to think flexibly and meet challenges creatively.
Mentoring and educational programs for female youth
Philadelphia youth network (pyn) equips young people to build lifelong skills, pursue meaningful careers, and embrace change with confidence - so they can thrive in the workforce, experience economic mobility, and strengthen their…
To empower young adults (17-20 year-olds) to develop skills and connect to opportunities by fostering an environment of love, support, and respect for their whole person. students graduate high school and successfully transition to college…
Heights is a new kind of organization, an economic mobility catalyst. we believe that creating pathways to educational and workforce success for low-income, black and brown, and first-generation-to-college students is the keystone of a…
We develop, engage, and retain principals and system leaders who transform schools, dramatically improve student outcomes, and drive systemic change to prepare all philadelphia students for college, career, and life.
To re-engage out-of-school youth with alternative educational programs and job connections, life skills training,counseling, media and technology skills
It is the mission of the multicultural academy charter school to educate the whole child by providing a safe environment where students can learn and teachers can instruct while emphasizing the importance of parental involvement in the…
Fab youth philly (fyp) is a philadelphia-based youth development organization that provides innovative, award-winning programming for youth, with a programmatic focus on workforce development opportunities for teens ages 15-19.
Phillycam provides transformative opportunities for people and communities to express themselves, to learn from each other, and to produce and share media reflective of the experiences of everyday people.
PACS prepares students to achieve the highest level of their potential, whether academically, social or morally. Our aim is to create life-long learners who exercise self discipline and self motivation and attain a high level of human…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Team Up Philly and the most unlike its peers is Yoga 4 the World. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 16% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 151 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CODED BY ↗
- Who funds CENTRO NUEVA CREACION NEW CREATION COMMUNITY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ROCK TO THE FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds Gemma Services ↗
- Who funds WORKSHOP LEARNING ↗
- Who funds AFTER SCHOOL ACTIVITIES PARTNERSHIPS ↗
- Who funds ONE HOUSE AT A TIME INC ↗
- Who funds THE BIG PICTURE ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds THE LIGHTHOUSE ↗
- Who funds Inner Strength Education ↗
- Who funds BUILDABRIDGE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds LIGUORI INC ↗
- Who funds MIGHTY WRITERS ↗
- Who funds Artistas y Musicos Latino Americanos ↗
- Who funds PHILADELPHIA YOUNG PLAYWRIGHTS ↗
- Who funds BREAKTHROUGH OF GREATER PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD BIKE WORKS ↗
- Who funds WEAVERS WAY COMMUNITY PROGRAMS ↗
- Who funds INN DWELLING INC ↗
- Who funds PROVIDENCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds Philadelphia Robotics Coalition Inc ↗
- Who funds TREE HOUSE BOOKS ↗
- Who funds WAGNER FREE INSTITUTE OF SCIENCE ↗
- Who funds THE ATTIC YOUTH CENTER ↗
- Who funds URBAN AFFAIRS COALITION ↗
- Who funds MUSICOPIA INC ↗
- Who funds YOUTH SENTENCING & REENTRY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds Achieve Now ↗
- Who funds MASTERY CHARTER SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SMITH MEMORIAL PLAYGROUND & PLAYHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds GIRLS ON THE RUN PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds VETRI FOUNDATION FOR CHILDREN ↗
- Who funds Education Law Center - PA ↗
- Who funds Starfinder Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Henrietta Tower Wurts Memorial Foundation · The Philadelphia Foundation · The Patricia Kind Family Foundation · The William Penn Foundation · Henry Dolfinger 2 Trust Uw · Lindback Cr & Mf Foundation Tw Main · Union Benevolent Association · The Barra Foundation Inc · The Allen Hilles Fund · Grace S and W Linton Nelson Foundation · The Philadelphia Cultural Fund Inc · Connelly Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert Institution for Poor Boys and Girls funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sheltered Yoga — 40% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert Institution for Poor Boys and Girls?
Find your warmest path to Adam and Maria Sarah Seybert Institution for Poor Boys and Girls through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.