Pennsylvania · Nonprofit
RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION
RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $41,355 to it, the largest being THE PATRICIA KIND FAMILY FOUNDATION ($20,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- Grace S and W Linton Nelson Foundationshared funders
- Center for Black Educator Developmentportfolio match
- 4point0 Schoolsportfolio match
Who funds it, year by year
2021 → 2022: the base broadened from 1 funder to 3 funders, grant income rose $1k → $40k.
From the IRS filings of RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION leans on a few funders — its largest provides 48% of grant income and the top three 99%; half comes from just 2 funders.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left
48% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2021 100% · 2022 50% — diversifying over time.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION draws 52% of its grant income from funders outside Pennsylvania, across 4 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- Grace S and W Linton Nelson Foundationshared fundersPA · backs 32 organizations that share your funders
- Center for Black Educator Developmentportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- 4point0 Schoolsportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Tntp Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Education Leaders of Color Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- New Schools Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- March for Our Lives Action Fundportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Restoring Lifewaysportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Camelback Venturesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Jane Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- The Schott Foundation for Public Educationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Every Student Every Community Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Pennsylvania
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Public support
100%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION?
- RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION (Pennsylvania) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $41,355 to it, the largest being THE PATRICIA KIND FAMILY FOUNDATION ($20,000). 0 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION have?
- IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $41,355 in grants to RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION.
- Who is the largest funder of RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION?
- THE PATRICIA KIND FAMILY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $20,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like RESTORATIVE PRACTICES IN ACTION find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Pennsylvania. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2023 (financials across 2023–2023), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing