Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Otis Booth Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$14M
Granted FY2024still arriving
140
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$5.0M
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20182024.

Education$43MArts & Culture$10.0MHealth$5.3MScience & Tech$5.1MHuman Services$5.0MPublic Safety & Disaster$4.1MAnimals$3.0MRecreation & Sports$2.2MOther$0
02FY2024 · 140 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $107k
  • $10k–50k66 grants · $1.2M
  • $50k–250k46 grants · $3.3M
  • $250k+6 grants · $9.8M
$25,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$231M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL$5,000,000
CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER$2,000,000
LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION$1,000,000
MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC$1,000,000
YOUNG AMERICA'S FOUNDATION$500,000
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$250,000
THACHER SCHOOL INC$200,000
THE GOODNATION FOUNDATION INC$200,000
ALL SAINTS' CHURCH$200,000
HILLSIDES$100,000
READY TO SUCCEED$100,000
MAYO CLINIC$100,000
SAVE OCEANSIDE SAND$100,000
RETINAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION$100,000
THE TEEN PROJECT$100,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–24, $7.7M) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THE COLLEAGUES: $50k → 14%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $50k → 20%THE COLLEAGUES: $50k → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $25k → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $25k → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $25k → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $25k → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $25k → 14%MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $1.0M → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $200k → 19%MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC: $20k → 19%CHILDREN AND FAMILY RESOURCE SERVICES: $20k → 14%WORD OF HONOR FUND: $30k → 7%WORD OF HONOR FUND: $30k → 7%WORD OF HONOR FUND: $25k → 7%WORD OF HONOR FUND: $25k → 7%WORD OF HONOR FUND: $25k → 7%WORD OF HONOR FUND: $20k → 7%WORD OF HONOR FUND: $20k → 7%RETINAL SCIENCE FOUNDATION: $100k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $100k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $75k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $75k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $50k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $30k → 14%CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC: $25k → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $50k → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $50k → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $50k → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $50k → 14%HILLSIDES: $150k → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $25k → 14%HILLSIDES: $125k → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $25k → 14%HILLSIDES: $125k → 14%THE COLLEAGUES: $25k → 14%HILLSIDES: $100k → 14%HILLSIDES: $100k → 14%HILLSIDES: $100k → 14%FARMLINK PROJECT: $25k → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 14%LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION: $1.0M → 14%HILLSIDES: $100k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $25k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $25k → 14%NEIGHBORHOOD YOUTH ASSOCIATION: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
ID
MT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
NJ
CT
RI
CA
CO
KY
VA
AZ
NM
NC
SC
DC
OK
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of The Otis Booth Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Otis Booth Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$72M · 159 repeat orgs$6.8M to everyone else

159 repeat relationships — 76 still active in FY2024, 83 since wound down; 35 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

159
113

Total granted

$72M
$3.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+27%
+32%

Still filing today

78%
65%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 77% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.2M went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesArts & CultureAnimalsHealthInternationalOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • HS
    HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL
    6× · 2018–2024 · $20M · revenue +17%
  • PA
    PETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    3× · 2019–2021 · $5.0M · revenue +13%
  • TT
    The Thacher School Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $4.9M · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $1.0M · revenue +37%
  • JS
    JULES STEIN EYE INSTITUTE AT UCLA
    one grant, 2021 · $250k
  • CP
    COMMUNITY PARTNERSgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $125k · revenue +216%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
Association of California School Administrators

The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.

3
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

4
Uc Santa Barbara Foundation

The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…

Education
5
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
6
The San Diego Foundation

The san diego foundation inspires enduring philanthropy and enables community solutions to improve the quality of life in our region.

Philanthropy
7
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
8
University of La Verne

The university of la verne offers a distinctive and relevant educational experience to a diverse population of traditional-age, adult, and graduate learners, preparing them for successful careers and a commitment to lifelong learning…

Education
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

12
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Tiger Woods Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Save Oceanside Sand. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Health Access Advocacy and …Animal Rescue and ShelterAffordable Housing Construc…Youth Development CentersCommunity Food PantriesCommunity Arts CentersElementary Literacy TutoringMilitary Veterans SupportDevelopmental Disabilities …Faith-Based Social ServicesWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyDomestic Violence ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Dance Arts OrganizationsFood Banks and PantriesChristian Missionary Organi…Equine Therapy ProgramsCommunity College Foundatio…Pregnancy Support ServicesCommunity FoundationsLocal History MuseumsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr15%6%5–10yr20%21%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr11%14%35–55yr13%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%1%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%5%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr11%6%35–55yr13%69%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.8% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.8%2/245
the rest of the field
14%
26,001/186,733

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

237 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 237 of the 318 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

7
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
37
Early backer (in before they grew)
233/237
Grantees still filing
170/237
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL — $20,190,000 · EducationHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOLUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $6,350,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIAThe Thacher School Inc — $4,936,000 · EducationThe Thacher School IncCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $3,016,667 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGYCATE SCHOOL — $2,025,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION — $1,510,000 · Education+24 more — $7,028,000 · Education+24 morePETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $5,000,000 · Arts & CulturePETERSEN AUTOM…LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $2,790,000 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PH…CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION — $2,000,000 · Arts & CultureCALIFORNIA SCI…+13 more — $1,234,999 · Arts & Culture+13 moreALL SAINTS' CHURCH — $1,550,000 · OtherALL SAINTS' CHURCHLAS MADRINAS — $1,132,000 · OtherLAS MADRINASUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA USC ATHLETICS — $910,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHE…Young America's Foundation — $595,000 · OtherPacific Legal Foundation — $1,600,000 · OtherPacific Legal Founda…CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUND — $975,000 · OtherCALIFORNIA AGRICULTU…Boys & Girls Clubs of Fresno Inc — $725,000 · Other+99 more — $8,294,500 · Other+99 moreLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION — $4,005,000 · Human ServicesLOS ANGELES…MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC — $1,230,000 · Human ServicesMARJAREE MA…The Teen Project Inc — $1,225,000 · Human ServicesThe Teen Pr…HILLSIDES — $815,000 · Human ServicesHILLSIDESTHE COLLEAGUES INC — $540,000 · Human ServicesTHE COLLEAG…CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $412,500 · Human Services+8 more — $583,500 · Human Services+8 moreST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $405,000 · HealthHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES — $360,000 · HealthMAYO CLINIC — $281,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES — $280,000 · HealthChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $260,000 · HealthASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $231,000 · HealthEisenhower Medical Center — $150,000 · HealthPasadena Hospital Association Ltd — $145,000 · HealthVALLEY CHILDREN'S HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $140,000 · HealthTexas Heart Institute — $100,000 · Health+5 more — $202,000 · HealthBROWN UNIVERSITY — $2,050,000 · Community ImprovementSANTA CRUZ ISLAND FOUNDATION — $150,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY PARTNERS — $125,000 · Community ImprovementEQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED — $398,000 · AnimalsANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE — $373,000 · AnimalsTHRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $246,000 · AnimalsGLOBAL STRAYS INC — $200,000 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS — $175,000 · AnimalsPeggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc — $163,500 · AnimalsEQUUS FOUNDATION INC — $125,000 · AnimalsHORSE TO HEART — $112,500 · AnimalsValley Oak SPCA — $95,000 · Animals+7 more — $290,000 · Animals
Education$45,055,667Arts & Culture$11,024,999Other$15,781,500Human Services$8,811,000Health$2,554,000Community Improvement$2,325,000Animals$2,178,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL — $20,190,000 over 6y, 4.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $6,350,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetPETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $5,000,000 over 3y, 15% of budgetThe Thacher School Inc — $4,936,000 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetLOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION — $4,005,000 over 5y, 17% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $3,016,667 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION — $2,790,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetBROWN UNIVERSITY — $2,050,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCATE SCHOOL — $2,025,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION — $2,000,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetPacific Legal Foundation — $1,600,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $1,510,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetMARJAREE MASON CENTER INC — $1,230,000 over 4y, 4.9% of budgetThe Teen Project Inc — $1,225,000 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,200,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetLAS MADRINAS — $1,132,000 over 6y, 91% of budgetTHE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION — $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.5% of budgetCALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUND — $975,000 over 5y, 11% of budgetHILLSIDES — $815,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetBoys & Girls Clubs of Fresno Inc — $725,000 over 5y, 6.9% of budgetMARLBOROUGH SCHOOL — $705,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetYoung America's Foundation — $595,000 over 6y, 1.2% of budgetTHE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE — $550,000 over 2y, 1.6% of budgetTHE COLLEAGUES INC — $540,000 over 7y, 17% of budgetDALTON SCHOOLS INC — $500,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC — $412,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC — $405,000 over 7y, 6.3% of budgetEQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED — $398,000 over 7y, 5.7% of budgetANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE — $373,000 over 7y, 8.0% of budgetHUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES — $360,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCRANE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $325,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetKIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $325,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCITY YEAR INC — $310,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetREADY TO SUCCEED — $300,000 over 3y, 16% of budgetWESTMONT COLLEGE — $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $281,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES — $280,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $280,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $260,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetWAKE FOREST UNIVERSITY — $250,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHRIVE ANIMAL RESCUE INC — $246,000 over 7y, 9.7% of budgetHOMEBOY INDUSTRIES — $245,000 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetASPEN VALLEY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION — $231,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetSANTA BARBARA MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY — $220,000 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetThe Preservation Foundation of Palm Beach Inc — $210,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE SEMINAR NETWORK INC — $200,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC — $200,000 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGoodnation Foundation Inc — $200,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds HARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA
  • Who funds PETERSEN AUTOMOTIVE MUSEUM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds The Thacher School Inc
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES POLICE FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds BROWN UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds CATE SCHOOL
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Pacific Legal Foundation
  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MARJAREE MASON CENTER INC
  • Who funds The Teen Project Inc
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LAS MADRINAS
  • Who funds THE GEORGE W BUSH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA AGRICULTURAL LEADERSHIP FOUND
  • Who funds HILLSIDES
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Clubs of Fresno Inc
  • Who funds MARLBOROUGH SCHOOL
  • Who funds Young America's Foundation
  • Who funds THE RONALD REAGAN PRESIDENTIAL FOUNDATION AND INSTITUTE
  • Who funds THE COLLEAGUES INC
  • Who funds DALTON SCHOOLS INC
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INC
  • Who funds ST LUKE'S WOOD RIVER FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds EQUINE ADVOCATES INCORPORATED
  • Who funds ANIMAL SHELTER OF WOOD RIVER VALLEY DBA MOUNTAIN HUMANE
  • Who funds HUNTINGTON MEDICAL RESEARCH INSTITUTES
  • Who funds CRANE COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL
  • Who funds KIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS
  • Who funds CITY YEAR INC
  • Who funds READY TO SUCCEED
  • Who funds WESTMONT COLLEGE
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Wm Keck FoundationCA36.6× affinity16 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Wm Keck Foundation · California Community Foundation · Pasadena Community Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Brittingham Family Foundation · Ann Jackson Family Foundation · Argyros Family Foundation · Orange County Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Rose Hills Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Otis Booth Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 130%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 1%
  • City Year Inc11% of income from government
  • Nantucket Book Foundation Inc1% of income from government
  • Nantucket Historical Association1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
43report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Otis Booth Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Otis Booth Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 318 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph