· Private foundation
The Ninnie L Baird Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k23 grants · $245k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| OUR FRIENDS PLACE | $15,000 |
| LVTRISE | $15,000 |
| UNION GOSPEL MISSION - TARRANT | $15,000 |
| ACT FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| CRISTO REY FORT WORTH COLLEGE PREP | $10,000 |
| GILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES | $10,000 |
| CANDLELIGHT RANCH | $10,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $10,000 |
| PROJECT 4031 | $10,000 |
| TOGETHER WE THRIVE | $10,000 |
| FUNKYTOWN FOOD PROJECT | $10,000 |
| OUTLOUD | $10,000 |
| 24 HOUR CLUB | $10,000 |
| THE ARTIST OUTREACH | $10,000 |
| METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY | $10,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $229k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.
34 repeat relationships — 11 still active in FY2024, 23 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 35% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $190k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LLVTRISE3× · 2021–2024 · $40k · revenue +19%
- CRCANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION3× · 2018–2024 · $35k · revenue +101%
- CHChrist's Haven for Children Inc2× · 2020–2023 · $25k · revenue +68%
Funded once
- COCITY OF ROCKPORTMEMORIAL FIELDone grant, 2018 · $20k
- MHMERCY HOUSEone grant, 2017 · $20k
- MOMEN OF NEHEMIAH INCone grant, 2023 · $15k · revenue +2%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
RAISE Texas advances equitable policies and programs that foster financial security and economic mobility for low- and moderate-income Texans. We equip, innovate and advocate to reduce disparities, remove barriers and build opportunities…
To strengthen families through parenting classes educational programs, youth programs and referral services for the prevention of child abuse and neglect.
Fort Bend County Child Advocates, Inc. provides a voice, heals the hurt and breaks the cycle of abuse and neglect for children in Fort Bend County.
To provide family services and to provide residential child care for dependent children where there is a need to assist children and families disrupted by problems.
Lone Star CASA elevates the voices of children in Kaufman and Rockwall County who have experienced abuse and neglect by providing trained volunteer advocates to work alongside children and families so they can achieve safety and stability…
The Organizations mission is to bring unity and efficiency to investigations of child abuse through the use of a multi-disciplinary team and, thereby, to provide the best possible services to victims of child abuse and their families.
Elevate North Texas offers a welcoming and affirming environment for youth 18-24 experiencing homelessness providing short-term housing and case management. Elevate North Texas addresses youth homelessness from two angles: a hotel program…
TexProtects advances public policy and local implementation to strenghten families to prevent child abuse and neglect.
To engage and educate communities to prevent sexual violence and to support survivors and their loved ones as they heal and thrive.
The mission of hope's door new beginning center is to offer intervention and prevention services to individuals and families affected by intimate partner and family violence and to provide education programs that enhance the community's…
The mission of Dallas County Family Resource Center is to provide programs to improve the quality of resources and well-being of the children and families in the community by intake, assessment, and referral of those in need to available…
Christian coaching, counseling, assessment and consulting services to the communities of Tarrant County, Texas.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Promise House Inc and the most unlike its peers is Trinity Restoration Ministries. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 26% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 17% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
99 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 99 of the 166 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LVTRISE ↗
- Who funds CANDLELIGHT RANCH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EDUCATIONAL FIRST STEPS ↗
- Who funds Christ's Haven for Children Inc ↗
- Who funds GILL CHILDREN'S SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds RISE ADVENTURES INC ↗
- Who funds METHODIST JUSTICE MINISTRY OF FUMC ↗
- Who funds VOGEL ALCOVE ↗
- Who funds Artist Outreach Inc ↗
- Who funds HOPE FARM INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY COMPASS ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds Van Cliburn Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds READERS 2 LEADERS ↗
- Who funds BRAVELOVE INC ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE INTERCOMMUNITY AGENCY INC ↗
- Who funds METROCREST SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Recovery Resource Council ↗
- Who funds MEN OF NEHEMIAH INC ↗
- Who funds LITERACY UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds OUT TEACH ↗
- Who funds MI ESCUELITA PRESCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds Prevent Blindness Texas ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF GREATER WICHITA FALLS AREA ↗
- Who funds Community Food Bank ↗
- Who funds OUR FRIENDS PLACE ↗
- Who funds LENA POPE HOME INC ↗
- Who funds CASA OF TARRANT COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds San Francisco Nativity Academy ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Rees-Jones Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · Gil and Dody Weaver Foundation · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · United Way of Metropolitan Dallas Inc · The Moody Foundation · Texas Women's Foundation · W P & Bulah Luse Foundation · Hillcrest Foundation · The Dallas Foundation · Garvey Texas Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Ninnie L Baird Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Ninnie L Baird Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Ninnie L Baird Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.