Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Louis & Harold Price Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.1M
Granted FY2024still arriving
52
Grants FY2024still arriving
9
States reached
$250k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Education$9.6MArts & Culture$3.7MFood & Nutrition$2.8MHealth$2.5MPhilanthropy$2.4MReligion$2.0MHuman Services$1.5MCommunity Improvement$1.3MOther$0
02FY2024 · 52 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k12 grants · $48k
  • $10k–50k23 grants · $438k
  • $50k–250k15 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+2 grants · $500k
$25,000
Median grant
9
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Center Theatre Group$250,000
Jewish Federation Council of Greater LA$250,000
Feeding America$200,000
Leo Baeck Temple$122,000
Temple Beth Hillel$100,000
Avenues to Independence$100,000
Music Associates of Aspen Inc$80,000
The Jewish Foundation For The Righteous$60,000
Food Bank for New York City$50,000
Sacramento Food Bank & Family Services$50,000
Food Bank of the Rockies$50,000
Volunteers of America$50,000
Shaare Zedek Hospital$50,000
Anti-Defamation League - National$50,000
Anti-Defamation League Los Angeles$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $897k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 85% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%Rescue Mission Alliance: $10k → 10%A Home Within: $10k → 10%SECOND NURTURE: $25k → 11%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $15k → 7%Blue Cross Blue Shield of Mass Fd Inc for Expanding Healthcare Acces: $20k → 16%Second Nurture: $25k → 11%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $15k → 7%Second Nurture: $10k → 11%Hope House of Colorado: $10k → 7%Safehouse Progressive Alliance for Nonviolence: $15k → 12%A Home Within: $20k → 10%Hope House of Colorado: $10k → 7%Safehouse Progressive Alliance for Nonviolence: $15k → 12%A Home Within: $20k → 10%HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO: $10k → 7%Huts for Vets: $50k → 7%Hope House of Colorado: $10k → 7%Intercambio Uniting Communities: $10k → 12%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $15k → 14%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $15k → 14%The People Concern: $10k → 14%PEOPLE CONCERN THE: $10k → 14%The People Concern: $10k → 14%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $15k → 12%SafeHouse Denver: $15k → 12%SafeHouse Denver: $15k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER: $15k → 12%SafeHouse Denver: $15k → 12%SAFEHOUSE DENVER INC: $15k → 12%SafeHouse Denver: $15k → 12%The Denver Rescue Mission: $25k → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION THE: $25k → 12%The Denver Rescue Mission: $25k → 12%The Denver Rescue Mission: $25k → 12%LARADON: $15k → 12%Laradon: $15k → 12%Laradon: $10k → 12%Laradon: $10k → 12%Laradon: $10k → 12%LARADON: $10k → 12%LARADON: $10k → 12%Union Settlement Association Inc: $10k → 17%UNION STATION HOMELESS SERVICES: $10k → 14%Jewish Family Service of Los Angeles: $10k → 14%Swipe Out Hunger: $30k → 14%St Joseph Center: $10k → 14%Exceptional Children's Foundation: $15k → 14%Exceptional Children's Foundation: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
WA
MN
IL
NY
MA
IN
NJ
CT
CA
CO
TN
NC
DC
AL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 12% of The Louis & Harold Price Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Louis & Harold Price Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$21M · 147 repeat orgs$1.6M to everyone else

147 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 103 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

147
71

Total granted

$21M
$1.5M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+47%
+50%

Still filing today

63%
48%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $156k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthEducationArts & CultureFood & NutritionEmploymentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • OS
    OAKWOOD SCHOOL
    7× · 2017–2023 · $2.1M · revenue +61%
  • Feeding America
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +40%
  • AT
    AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE
    6× · 2017–2024 · $600k · revenue +107%

Funded once

  • TU
    The UCLA Foundation
    one grant, 2018 · $260k
  • CT
    Center Theater Group
    one grant, 2018 · $200k
  • UO
    University of Colorado Herbst Program for Engineering Ethics and Society
    one grant, 2019 · $130k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
University of Southern California

The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…

Education
2
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
3
Altamed Health Services Corporation

To eliminate disparities in health care access and outcomes by providing superior quality health and human services through an integrated world-class delivery system for latino, multi-ethnic underserved communities in southern california.

Health
4
Stony Brook Surgical Associates University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
6
Neurology Associates of Stony Brook University Faculty Practice Corp

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
8
Banner -University Medical Group

Assist banner health complete its mission to make health care easier so life can be better by providing integrated & coordinated care & population health management.

Health
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
Stony Brook Urology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
11
California Dental Association Foundation

The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.

Science & Tech
12
Stony Brook Ophthalmology University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Center for Family Philanthropy Inc and the most unlike its peers is Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Massachusetts Foundation for Expanding Health Care Access. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsJewish Community Organizati…Food Banks and PantriesPregnancy Support ServicesCommunity College Foundatio…Women & Girls Leadership De…Orchestra and Ensemble Perf…Animal Rescue and ShelterVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Youth CampsYouth Development ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsHealth Access Advocacy and …Community Arts CentersLocal History MuseumsDevelopmental Disabilities …Cancer Support ServicesIndependent K-12 Schools
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%0%<5yr15%4%5–10yr20%10%10–20yr17%24%20–35yr11%27%35–55yr13%36%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%3%10–20yr17%9%20–35yr11%16%35–55yr13%71%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.7%1/147
the rest of the field
14%
26,002/186,831

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

137 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 137 of the 231 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
133/137
Grantees still filing
111/137
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

University of California Los Angeles — $1,718,350 · OtherUniversity of California Los AngelesLEO BAECK TEMPLE — $1,298,000 · OtherLEO BAECK TEMPLEThe Jewish Federation of Greater Los Angeles — $925,000 · OtherThe Jewish Federation of Greater Los AngelesTemple Beth Hillel — $645,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO — $500,000 · OtherAVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE — $600,000 · Other+114 more — $8,038,098 · Other+114 moreUCLA FOUNDATION — $4,470,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONOAKWOOD SCHOOL — $2,115,100 · EducationOAKWOOD SCHOOLDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL — $340,000 · Education+16 more — $663,000 · Education+16 moreCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES — $1,265,000 · Arts & CultureCENTER THE…MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC — $536,210 · Arts & CultureMUSIC ASSO…THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC — $260,000 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH…THE GARRY MARSHALL THEATRE — $110,000 · Arts & Culture+11 more — $392,887 · Arts & Culture+11 moreFeeding America — $1,260,000 · Food & NutritionFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $260,000 · Food & NutritionMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $175,000 · Food & Nutrition+2 more — $53,000 · Food & NutritionJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA — $1,525,000 · Philanthropy+3 more — $46,000 · PhilanthropyDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $200,000 · Human ServicesHOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO — $130,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC — $105,000 · Human ServicesLARADON HALL SOCIETY FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN AND ADULTS — $80,000 · Human ServicesTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $60,000 · Human ServicesSECOND NURTURE — $60,000 · Human ServicesA HOME WITHIN INC — $55,000 · Human ServicesSWIPE OUT HUNGER — $50,000 · Human ServicesHuts for Vets — $50,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHOUSE PROGRESSIVE ALLIANCE FOR NONVIOLENCE INC — $35,000 · Human ServicesBessies Hope — $35,000 · Human Services+11 more — $181,000 · Human ServicesCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $320,000 · HealthTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC — $150,000 · HealthALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $50,000 · HealthLenox Hill Hospital — $45,000 · Health+11 more — $190,000 · Health
Other$13,724,448Education$7,588,100Arts & Culture$2,564,097Food & Nutrition$1,748,000Philanthropy$1,571,000Human Services$1,041,000Health$755,000

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $4,470,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetOAKWOOD SCHOOL — $2,115,100 over 7y, 1.6% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA — $1,525,000 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetCENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES — $1,265,000 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetFeeding America — $1,260,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE — $600,000 over 6y, 2.9% of budgetMUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC — $536,210 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetDE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL — $340,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES — $330,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC — $330,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetBridging Bionics Foundation — $325,000 over 8y, 8.1% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $320,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $300,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $280,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK — $275,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC — $260,000 over 6y, 2.8% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $260,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE — $230,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetWORKSHOP IN BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES INC — $200,000 over 4y, 31% of budgetDENVER RESCUE MISSION — $200,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BUDDY PROGRAM INC — $195,000 over 5y, 2.2% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $175,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC — $150,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $150,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO — $130,000 over 8y, 2.2% of budgetFRESH START SURGICAL GIFTS — $120,000 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetTHE GARRY MARSHALL THEATRE — $110,000 over 7y, 2.0% of budgetPOPULATION CONNECTION — $110,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetSAFEHOUSE DENVER INC — $105,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $99,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSCHOOL ON WHEELS INC — $95,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetLOS ANGELES JEWISH HOME FOR THE AGING — $90,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetEnglish in Action — $85,000 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetASPEN YOUTH CENTER — $80,000 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetASPEN VALLEY SKISNOWBOARD CLUB INC — $80,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetLARADON HALL SOCIETY FOR EXCEPTIONAL CHILDREN AND ADULTS — $80,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHARVARD-WESTLAKE SCHOOL — $73,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $70,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAspen Homeless Shelter — $70,000 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetAMERICAN CORPORATION OF THE ARTS — $67,887 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC — $60,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetTHE PEOPLE CONCERN — $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSECOND NURTURE — $60,000 over 3y, 7.7% of budgetMUSEUM ASSOCIATES — $60,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION — $60,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTeach for America Inc — $60,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetA HOME WITHIN INC — $55,000 over 4y, 3.9% of budgetASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $55,000 over 8y, 1.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds OAKWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
  • Who funds CENTER THEATRE GROUP OF LOS ANGELES ↗
  • Who funds Feeding America ↗
  • Who funds AVENUES TO INDEPENDENCE ↗
  • Who funds MUSIC ASSOCIATES OF ASPEN INC ↗
  • Who funds DE TOLEDO HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SACRAMENTO FOOD BANK & FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Bridging Bionics Foundation ↗
  • Who funds CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES REGIONAL FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH FOUNDATION FOR THE RIGHTEOUS INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds WORKSHOP IN BUSINESS OPPORTUNITIES INC ↗
  • Who funds DENVER RESCUE MISSION ↗
  • Who funds THE BUDDY PROGRAM INC ↗
  • Who funds MANNA FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Louis and Harold …Colorado Gives Founda…Aspen Community Found…Rose Community Founda…The Denver FoundationThe Colorado Health F…The Annenberg Foundat…The Ralph M Parsons F…Aspen Business Center…Castaways FoundationAlpenglow FoundationCalifornia Community …
The Louis and Harold Price Foundation IncCO36.9× affinity15 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Louis and Harold Price Foundation Inc · Colorado Gives Foundation · Aspen Community Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Aspen Business Center Foundation · Castaways Foundation · Alpenglow Foundation · California Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Louis & Harold Price Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 50%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Saint Francis House Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
5get no government money at all
39report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Louis & Harold Price Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Louis & Harold Price Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 231 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home