Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Alpenglow Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$989k
Granted FY2024still arriving
131
Grants FY2024still arriving
17
States reached
$75k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Arts & Culture$1.2MHealth$1.1MEducation$975kEnvironment$717kFood & Nutrition$483kReligion$470kInternational$427kPhilanthropy$331kOther$0
02FY2024 · 131 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k98 grants · $291k
  • $10k–50k28 grants · $423k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $276k
$5,000
Median grant
17
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
INTERNATIONAL RESCUE COMMITTEE$75,000
TINY NEWS COLLECTIVE$50,500
ENGLISH IN ACTION$50,400
THE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS$50,000
FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES$50,000
THE ASPEN INSTITUTE$30,000
ASPEN FILM$26,000
Individual grant recipient$25,000
GRAND COUNTY FOOD BANK$25,000
FRIENDS OF MAROLT PARK$25,000
COMMUNITY RESPONSE COALITION OF KENTUCKY$25,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD OF THE ROCKY MOUNTAINS$25,000
ROARING FORK SAFE PASSAGES$20,000
LIFT UP$20,000
CIVICASPEN$20,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $189k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOSPICE EAST INC: $5k → 15%WESTERN REGIONAL ADVOCACY PROJECT: $1k → 10%MOAB HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $25k → 11%THE DENVER HOSPICE: $1k → 12%MOAB HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $2k → 12%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $2k → 12%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $2k → 12%MOAB HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $2k → 12%MOAB HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $2k → 12%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $2k → 12%WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $2k → 12%MOAB HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $1k → 12%THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO: $1k → 12%RIVER CENTER: $10k → 8%RIVER CENTER: $10k → 8%HUTS FOR VETS: $1k → 7%RIVER CENTER: $10k → 8%RIVER CENTER: $5k → 8%RIVER CENTER: $5k → 8%HUTS FOR VETS: $1k → 7%RIVER CENTER: $3k → 8%RIVER CENTER: $3k → 8%HUTS FOR VETS: $1k → 7%RIVER CENTER: $3k → 8%HUTS FOR VETS: $1k → 7%HUTS FOR VETS: $1k → 7%HUTS FOR VETS: $1k → 7%HUTS FOR VETS: $1k → 7%HUTS FOR VETS: $1k → 7%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 12%DENVER RESCUE MISSION: $10k → 12%COMMUNITY RESPONSE COALITION OF KENTUCKY: $25k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
WV
VA
MD
AZ
NM
TN
NC
DC
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.2M · 133 repeat orgs$496k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +41% since the first grant, against +24% for the ones you funded once.

133 repeat relationships — 109 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 18 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

133
48

Total granted

$6.2M
$338k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+41%
+24%

Still filing today

69%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $159k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationEnvironmentHealthHuman ServicesAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CR
    COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $513k · revenue +56%
  • IR
    International Rescue Committee INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $425k · revenue +81%
  • MF
    MOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS
    7× · 2018–2024 · $400k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -23%
  • TG
    THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +44%
  • TW
    TEAM WKY RELIEF FUND
    one grant, 2021 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Rocky Mountain Wild

Rocky mountain wild works to protect, connect, and restore wildlife and wild lands in the southern rocky mountain region. we work to secure the biodiversity of the mountains, plains, and desert ecosystems of colorado, wyoming, utah, and…

Environment
2
Aia Colorado

AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…

—
3
Wild Rockies Field Institute Inc

To broaden the nature of a liberal arts education; teach critical thinking about social & environmental issues; foster understanding of & respect for natural & human communities; & cultivate a sense of place that encourages personal,…

Education
4
Colorado Museum of Natural History

Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.

Arts & Culture
5
Colorado Legal Services

To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.

Crime & Legal
6
Mountain Area Land Trust

Mountain area land trust's mission is to save natural areas, wildlife habitat, streams and rivers, working ranches and historic lands, for the benefit of the community and as a legacy for future generations.

Environment
7
Colorado Water Trust

To restore water to colorado's rivers.

Environment
8
Colorado Open Lands

Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.

Environment
9
Conservation Legacy

Conservation legacy engages future leaders who protect, restore, and enhance our nation's lands through community-based service.in 2024, conservation legacy engaged 2,524 participants who completed over 1.5 million service hours on public…

Youth Development
10
Public Broadcasting of Colorado Inc

To deliver meaningful news, music, and cultural experiences to everyone in colorado using the power of the human voice in all its forms

Arts & Culture
11
Colorado Headwaters Land Trust

To conserve and steward the open lands and natural character of the headwaters of the colorado river in partnership with the local community.

—
12
Greater Yellowstone Coalition

Greater yellowstone coalition works with all people to protect the lands, waters, and wildlife of the greater yellowstone ecosystem, now and for future generations.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mile High United Way Inc and the most unlike its peers is Friends of Marolt Park. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity Arts CentersFood Banks and PantriesPolicy Research and AdvocacyHealth Access Advocacy and …Dance Arts OrganizationsImmigrant Worker SupportCancer Support ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsCommunity Food PantriesSchool Parent OrganizationsOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Affordable Housing Developm…Christian Missionary Organi…Addiction Recovery ServicesAffordable Housing Construc…Local History MuseumsAnimal Rescue and ShelterVolunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Pregnancy Support ServicesSchool District FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Community FoundationsUnited Way Affiliates
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%4%<5yr15%6%5–10yr21%27%10–20yr17%21%20–35yr12%21%35–55yr13%21%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%2%<5yr15%2%5–10yr21%26%10–20yr17%13%20–35yr12%25%35–55yr13%33%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/147
the rest of the field
13%
4,365/33,270

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

139 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 139 of the 202 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
42
Early backer (in before they grew)
135/139
Grantees still filing
98/139
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ASPEN CHAPEL — $187,544 · OtherASPEN CHAPELCHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRAL — $180,500 · OtherCHRIST CHURCH CATHEDRALGRAND COUNTY FOOD BANK — $125,000 · OtherCRCKY — $100,000 · OtherLIFT UP — $95,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $250,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIESTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $133,000 · Other+116 more — $1,589,767 · Other+116 moreTHE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS — $332,500 · Arts & CultureTHE ARTS CAMPUS A…The Art Base — $303,940 · Arts & CultureThe Art BaseCONCRETE COUCH — $77,500 · Arts & CultureCONCRETE COUCHASPEN FILM — $56,000 · Arts & CultureThe Tiny News Collective Inc — $50,500 · Arts & CultureDENVER ART MUSEUM — $50,400 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION — $40,000 · Arts & Culture+19 more — $164,412 · Arts & Culture+19 moreMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS — $400,000 · HealthMOUNTAIN FAMILY …COLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC — $400,000 · HealthCOLORADO WEST RE…MOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC — $60,000 · HealthMOAB FREE HEALTH…ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $60,000 · HealthROCKY MOUNTAIN P…CLL Global Research Foundation — $50,000 · Health+3 more — $27,500 · HealthCOLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC — $512,500 · EducationCOLORADO ROCKY …English in Action — $89,400 · EducationEnglish in Acti…VALLEY SETTLEMENT — $75,000 · EducationVALLEY SETTLEME…THE COLORADO COLLEGE — $60,000 · EducationTHE COLORADO CO…BASALT EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $55,000 · EducationBASALT EDUCATIO…THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Education+14 more — $114,565 · Education+14 moreInternational Rescue Committee INC — $425,000 · International+3 more — $18,000 · InternationalASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST — $129,900 · EnvironmentSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance — $60,000 · EnvironmentRoaring Fork Safe Passages — $50,000 · EnvironmentFRIENDS OF MAROLT PARK — $50,000 · EnvironmentHIGH COUNTRY NEWS — $36,000 · EnvironmentAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $30,000 · EnvironmentTHE WILDERNESS LAND TRUST — $20,000 · EnvironmentBLUEGRASS LAND CONSERVANCY INC — $15,515 · Environment+7 more — $38,450 · EnvironmentASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $137,031 · PhilanthropyMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $100,000 · PhilanthropyBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $5,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,660,811Arts & Culture$1,075,252Health$997,500Education$956,465International$443,000Environment$429,865Philanthropy$302,031

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCOLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC — $512,500 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $425,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetMOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS — $400,000 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetCOLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC — $400,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetTHE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS — $332,500 over 7y, 7.3% of budgetThe Art Base — $303,940 over 8y, 31% of budgetFOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES — $250,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $137,031 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetTHE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC — $133,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST — $129,900 over 8y, 23% of budgetMILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetEnglish in Action — $89,400 over 8y, 1.5% of budgetCONCRETE COUCH — $77,500 over 8y, 13% of budgetVALLEY SETTLEMENT — $75,000 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetMOAB HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetMOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC — $60,000 over 5y, 3.4% of budgetBLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $60,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC — $60,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSouthern Utah Wilderness Alliance — $60,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COLORADO COLLEGE — $60,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN FILM — $56,000 over 6y, 2.0% of budgetBASALT EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $55,000 over 8y, 7.7% of budgetThe Tiny News Collective Inc — $50,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetDENVER ART MUSEUM — $50,400 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetCLL Global Research Foundation — $50,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetGOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC — $50,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRoaring Fork Safe Passages — $50,000 over 3y, 25% of budgetFRIENDS OF MAROLT PARK — $50,000 over 2y, 25% of budgetMOAB VALLEY MULTICULTURAL CENTER — $50,000 over 5y, 2.1% of budgetWILDERNESS WORKSHOP — $48,400 over 8y, 0.9% of budgetRiver Center of New Castle Inc — $47,602 over 8y, 3.2% of budgetWestern Resource Advocates — $40,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetAspen Fly Right — $40,000 over 2y, 20% of budgetCENTER FOR ACTION AND CONTEMPLATION — $40,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetHIGH COUNTRY NEWS — $36,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMountain Rescue Aspen Inc — $32,500 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetDANCEASPEN — $31,000 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetAMERICAN RIVERS INC — $30,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetASPEN HISTORICAL SOCIETY — $27,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetTHE AMERICAN ALPINE CLUB — $25,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD CHARTER SCHOOLS — $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKENTUCKY REFUGEE MINISTRIES INC — $25,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCIVICLEX INCORPORATED — $25,000 over 5y, 5.3% of budgetMoab Solutions Inc — $25,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetCOMMUNITY RESPONSE COALITION OF KENTUCKY INC — $25,000 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetKENTUCKY COLLEGE OF ART DESIGN — $25,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetGRAND COUNTY EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 5y, 21% of budgetTHE ACCESS FUND — $21,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COLORADO ROCKY MOUNTAIN SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAIN FAMILY HEALTH CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds COLORADO WEST REGIONAL MENTAL HEALTH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARTS CAMPUS AT WILLITS ↗
  • Who funds The Art Base ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE ASPEN INSTITUTE INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN VALLEY LAND TRUST ↗
  • Who funds MILE HIGH UNITED WAY INC ↗
  • Who funds English in Action ↗
  • Who funds CONCRETE COUCH ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY SETTLEMENT ↗
  • Who funds MOAB HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOAB FREE HEALTH CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE GRASS COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
  • Who funds Southern Utah Wilderness Alliance ↗
  • Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds ASPEN FILM ↗
  • Who funds BASALT EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds The Tiny News Collective Inc ↗
  • Who funds DENVER ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds CLL Global Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds GOD'S PANTRY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GEORGE AND BARBARA BUSH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Roaring Fork Safe Passages ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF MAROLT PARK ↗
  • Who funds MOAB VALLEY MULTICULTURAL CENTER ↗
  • Who funds WILDERNESS WORKSHOP ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Aspen Community Found…Colorado Gives Founda…Aspen Business Center…Arches FoundationWestern Colorado Comm…Brady FoundationBlue Grass Community …Rose Community Founda…The Thrift ShopPalladium FoundationThe Denver FoundationEl Pomar Foundation
Aspen Community FoundationCO74.8× affinity37 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Aspen Community Foundation · Colorado Gives Foundation · Aspen Business Center Foundation · Arches Foundation · Western Colorado Community Foundation Inc · Brady Foundation · Blue Grass Community Foundation Inc · Rose Community Foundation · The Thrift Shop · Palladium Foundation · The Denver Foundation · El Pomar Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Alpenglow Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    51report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 202 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines