· Private foundation
The Jerry Gart Family Foundation AKA TGFF
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k44 grants · $103k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $131k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CRAIG HOSPITAL FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| ROSE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $25,500 |
| FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW | $20,000 |
| HILLEL OF COLORADO | $10,000 |
| WESTERN RESOURCE ADVOCATES | $10,000 |
| KENT DENVER SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| JEWISHCOLORADO | $10,000 |
| Colorado Institute of Developmental Pediatrics Inc | $10,000 |
| THERE WITH CARE | $7,500 |
| COLORADO GIVES FOUNDATION | $7,250 |
| ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL | $5,500 |
| TEMPLE EMANUEL | $5,186 |
| WISH FOR WHEELS | $5,000 |
| GLOBAL LIVINGSTON INSTITUTE | $5,000 |
| LIVLYME FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $133k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +32% since the first grant, against +17% for the ones you funded once.
53 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 23 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 64% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $69k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHCraig Hospital Foundation4× · 2021–2024 · $119k · revenue +35%
- ALANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE3× · 2021–2023 · $52k · revenue +34%
- KDKENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL4× · 2021–2024 · $51k · revenue +90%
Funded once
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTHone grant, 2021 · $120k · revenue 0%- HLHIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCYone grant, 2021 · $100k · revenue +4%
- EREAGLE RIVER WATERSHED COUNCILgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $28k · revenue +58%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
AIA Colorado,is the voice of the architecture profession in Colorado. Through advocacy, leadership development, education and resources for architects, the organization supports architecture professionals in designing a better world where…
Colorado center on law and policy is an antipoverty organization advancing the rights of every coloradan.
The mission of denver botanic gardens is to connect people with plants, especially plants from the rocky mountain region and similar regions around the world, providing delight and enlightenment to everyone.
See schedule ouniversity corporation for atmospheric research (ucar), on behalf of, and in cooperation with its member university members, is engaged in the management of long-term atmospheric and related research and educational…
The mission of education commission of the states is to advocate for attaining educational excellence for all and to help state leaders identify, develop and implement public policy for education that addresses current and future needs of…
Be a catalyst! Ignite our community's passion for nature and science.
To advance the science of jurisprudence, secure the more efficient administration of justice, encourage the adoption of proper legislation, advocate thorough and continuing legal education, uphold the honor and integrity of the bar,…
Colorado open lands' mission is to preserve the significant open lands and natural heritage of colorado through private and public partnerships, innovative land conservation, and strategic leadership.
To inspire people and mobilize resources to strengthen our community.
Philanthropy colorado is a nonprofit membership association for grantmakers throughout the state. its mission is strengthen colorado communities by bringing people, information and resources together.
See schedule o colorado state university foundation assists in the promotion, development, and enhancement of facilities and educational programs and enhancements of faculty, students, and alumni of colorado state university (csu). this is…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Colorado Gives Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Sweetfeet. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 32 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
105 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 105 of the 136 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds Craig Hospital Foundation ↗
- Who funds HIGH LINE CANAL CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds Trustees of Dartmouth College ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Rose Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds KENT DENVER COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds COLORADO INSTITUTE OF DEVELOPMENTAL PEDIATRICS INC ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN PLANNED PARENTHOOD INC ↗
- Who funds CONSERVATION COLORADO ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds EAGLE RIVER WATERSHED COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds THE WOMEN'S FOUNDATION OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds The Denver Children's Foundation ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF JCC KRAKOW INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL LIVINGSTON INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds THE TRUST FOR PUBLIC LAND ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
- Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO DENVER INC ↗
- Who funds PROTECT OUR WINTERS ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC BROADCASTING OF COLORADO INC ↗
- Who funds JEWISHColorado ↗
- Who funds Western Resource Advocates ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Wish for Wheels Inc ↗
- Who funds COLORADO FOURTEENERS INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds SO ALL MAY EAT INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · The Denver Foundation · Rose Community Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · Schlessman Foundation Inc · The Janus Henderson Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Anschutz Family Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · Western Union Foundation · Gates Family Foundation · Robert E & Anne T Sneed Aka Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Jerry Gart Family Foundation AKA TGFF funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Middlebury College — 1% of income from government
- Jewish Association for Residential Care Inc — 1% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Jerry Gart Family Foundation AKA TGFF?
Find your warmest path to The Jerry Gart Family Foundation AKA TGFF through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.