· Private foundation
The Hartman Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k78 grants · $111k
- $10k–50k6 grants · $71k
- $50k–250k18 grants · $1.8M
- $250k+5 grants · $5.6M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEILL CORNELL MEDICINE | $2,250,000 |
| PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS | $1,463,000 |
| UJA FEDERATION | $949,180 |
| FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION | $501,000 |
| CONGREGATION EMANU-EL NY | $455,085 |
| INTERFAITH AMERICA | $200,000 |
| THE NANTUCKET PROJECT ACADEMY | $200,000 |
| ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI | $135,000 |
| FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER | $112,500 |
| AJC - AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE | $105,000 |
| JEWISH STORY PARTNERS | $100,000 |
| CENTER FOR JEWISH CULTURE | $100,000 |
| PENTA MEDICAL RECYCLING CORP | $75,000 |
| GEORGIA COALITION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON | $75,000 |
| OPEN DOOR ABUSE AWARENESS | $75,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $187k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 9% of The Hartman Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 81% of the giving stays in NY; read by stated purpose it is 75% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +35% since the first grant, against +14% for the ones you funded once.
105 repeat relationships — 44 still active in FY2024, 61 since wound down; 56 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $469k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- UJUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC5× · 2017–2024 · $3.1M · revenue +39%
- FAFOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC6× · 2017–2024 · $1.5M · revenue +60%
Northwestern University5× · 2017–2023 · $505k · revenue +41%
Funded once
- WCWeill Cornell Medical Collegeone grant, 2021 · $2.0M
- UPU. Pennone grant, 2021 · $237k
- UPU PENNone grant, 2023 · $101k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.
The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.
See schedule othe organization is a not-for-profit, public charity established in 1911 to provide for the quality and continuity of jewish life in western new york and around the world through private philanthropy. the foundation seeks,…
Committed to exceptional healthcare quality for all and actively engaged with our community, einstein drives scientific discovery and educates compassionate leaders in health and science.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
The institute for protein innovation is advancing protein science to accelerate research and improve human health.
To bring quality public television programs and resources to communities throughout new jersey and its tri-state neighbors. its content, both on-air and online, aims to reflect the diverse
The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…
Activate empowers scientists to reinvent the world by bringing their research to market. activate partners with u.s. based funders, research institutions, and other pillars of the hard technology community to help entrepreneurial…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is New York Cares Inc and the most unlike its peers is Delegation of Jewish American Students (Dojas). Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 5% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
236 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 236 of the 367 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
- Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD ALLERGY RESEARCH & EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE UNIVERSITY OF PENNSYLVANIA ↗
- Who funds Northwestern University ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH AMERICA ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ISRAEL EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE NANTUCKET PROJECT ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds ETHICAL CULTURE FIELDSTON SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds OUR COMMUNITY LTD ↗
- Who funds ABRAHAMIC HOUSE ↗
- Who funds Community Cooperative dba Francesco Collaborative ↗
- Who funds FLORIDA RISING TOGETHER INC ↗
- Who funds TASSELTURN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds GEORGIA COALITION FOR HIGHER EDUCATION IN PRISON INC ↗
- Who funds IRONBOUND BOXING AND EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds PENTA MEDICAL RECYCLING CORP ↗
- Who funds The Tenant Education Network ↗
- Who funds ICAHN SCHOOL OF MEDICINE AT MOUNT SINAI ↗
- Who funds BLACKROOTS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CHANGE THE TUNE INC ↗
- Who funds Healing to Action ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCECHICAGO ↗
- Who funds PARITY BALTIMORE INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH STORY PARTNERS ↗
- Who funds The Center for Jewish Culture ↗
- Who funds WRITOPIA LAB INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Nantucket Golf Club Foundation Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · Jewish Communal Fund · The Shimon Ben Joseph Foundation Dba Jim Joseph Foundation · Karp Family Foundation Stephen R and Jill E Karp Trustees · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Bruce and Deborah Duncan Foundation · Fjc · The Kaye Family Foundation · Jewish Community Federation of San Francisco the Peninsula Marin & Sonoma
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Hartman Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- A Safe Place Inc — 45% of income from government
- Care Dimensions Inc — 14% of income from government
- Trustees of Tufts College — 13% of income from government
- Parity Baltimore Incorporated — 11% of income from government
- University of Miami — 5% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Nantucket Book Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- Nantucket Historical Association — 1% of income from government
- Our House Inc — 1% of income from government
- Sandy Hook Promise Foundation — 0% of income from government
- Artists Association of Nantucket Inc — 0% of income from government
- World Forestry Center — 0% of income from government
- Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.