· Private foundation
Karp Family Foundation Stephen R and Jill E Karp Trustees
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2021–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k10 grants · $25k
- $10k–50k11 grants · $198k
- $50k–250k7 grants · $490k
- $250k+3 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES | $500,000 |
| UNION COLLEGE | $400,000 |
| BOSTON YOUTH SANCTUARY | $400,000 |
| TEMPLE BETH AVODAH | $160,000 |
| OUR GENERATION SPEAKS | $60,000 |
| THE JOEY FUND | $60,000 |
| THEATRE WORKSHOP OF NANTUCKET INC | $60,000 |
| GETTING TO WE INC | $50,000 |
| Individual grant recipient | $50,000 |
| BELMONT HILL SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| HOSPITALITY HOMES INC | $33,334 |
| CROSSROADS | $25,000 |
| MT AUBURN HOSPITAL | $25,000 |
| PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND | $25,000 |
| THE BOSTON FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $110k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +7% since the first grant, against +1% for the ones you funded once.
41 repeat relationships — 22 still active in FY2025, 19 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 94% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $119k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- CHChildren's Hospital Corporation2× · 2021–2023 · $2.0M · revenue +41%
- LCLAHEY CLINIC INC2× · 2021–2024 · $300k · revenue +7%
- TWTHEATRE WORKSHOP OF NANTUCKET INC5× · 2021–2025 · $205k · revenue +47%
Funded once
- BIBETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INCone grant, 2024 · $200k · revenue 0%
- NENEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INCone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +22%
- FMFOUNDATION MASS EYE & EAR INCone grant, 2024 · $44k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…
Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…
Mission strengthened by more than a century and a half of dedication to academic excellence, boston college commits itself to the highest standards of teaching and research in undergraduate, graduate and professional programs and to the…
The organization's primary exempt purpose is to provide access to and conduct activities in furtherance of higher education.
Organization's mission bentley university believes good business can impact more than the bottom line - it can change the world. bentley is a community of future business leaders who will deliver value in the marketplace and lasting…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
New england museum association's mission is to connect a community engaged in learning, collaboration, and action to cultivate a better museum world.
Our mission is to improve quality of life by transforming the understanding, treatment, and care of the ocular surface.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Childrens Museum and the most unlike its peers is Boston Youth Sanctuary Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
77 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 77 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BOSTON YOUTH SANCTUARY INC ↗
- Who funds FACING HISTORY & OURSELVES INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation ↗
- Who funds Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc ↗
- Who funds LAHEY CLINIC INC ↗
- Who funds THEATRE WORKSHOP OF NANTUCKET INC ↗
- Who funds BETH ISRAEL DEACONESS MEDICAL CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BELMONT HILL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds BOSTON MEDICAL CENTER CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds PERKINS SCHOOL FOR THE BLIND ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds Hospitality Homes Inc ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds OUR GENERATION SPEAKS INC ↗
- Who funds Boston Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds GETTING TO WE ↗
- Who funds BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND LIFE FLIGHT INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET FILM FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds NANTUCKET GOLF CLUB FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds MUSEUM OF FINE ARTS ↗
- Who funds NEW ENGLAND BAPTIST HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds LESLEY UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds BIOMEDICAL SCIENCE CAREERS PROGRAM INC ↗
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF BOSTON UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Boston Charitable Trust Fund City of Boston Trust Office ↗
- Who funds BRIDGE OVER TROUBLED WATERS INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc · Boston Foundation Inc · Combined Jewish Philanthropies of Greater Boston Inc · Nantucket Golf Club Foundation Inc · Ernst & Elfriede Frank Foundation Inc · Eastern Bank Foundation · Mutual Bancorp Foundation Inc Fka Cape Cod 5 Foundation Inc · Rockland Trust - Blue Hills Charitable Foundation · The Hartman Family Foundation · Cape Cod Five Cents Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Trust · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · Clara Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Karp Family Foundation Stephen R and Jill E Karp Trustees funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- A Safe Place Inc — 45% of income from government
- Museum of African American History Inc — 43% of income from government
- Cape Ann Museum Inc — 38% of income from government
- Bridge Over Troubled Waters Inc — 32% of income from government
- The Second Step Inc — 26% of income from government
- Boston Medical Center Corporation — 23% of income from government
- Horizons for Homeless Children — 21% of income from government
- Ellis Early Learning Inc — 20% of income from government
- Heading Home Inc — 17% of income from government
- Trustees of Boston University — 12% of income from government
- New England Aquarium Corporation — 12% of income from government
- Pine Street Inn Inc — 11% of income from government
- Community Foundation for Nantucket Inc — 10% of income from government
- Children's Hospital Corporation — 10% of income from government
- Nantucket Maria Mitchell Association in — 9% of income from government
- Brandeis University — 9% of income from government
- Perkins School for the Blind — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center Inc — 6% of income from government
- New England Life Flight Inc — 5% of income from government
- Huntington Theatre Co Inc — 4% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Familyaid Boston Inc — 4% of income from government
- Children's Trust Inc — 3% of income from government
- Cradles to Crayons Inc — 2% of income from government
- Boys & Girls Clubs of Boston Inc — 2% of income from government
- Grub Street Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Childrens Museum — 1% of income from government
- Crossroads for Kids Inc — 1% of income from government
- Nantucket Book Foundation Inc — 1% of income from government
- New England Baptist Hospital — 1% of income from government
- Lahey Clinic Inc — 1% of income from government
- Nantucket Historical Association — 1% of income from government
- Lesley University — 1% of income from government
- Boston Symphony Orchestra Inc — 0% of income from government
- Hebrew Senior Life Inc — 0% of income from government
- Artists Association of Nantucket Inc — 0% of income from government
- Museum of Fine Arts — 0% of income from government
- Emerson College — 0% of income from government
- Boston Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Karp Family Foundation Stephen R and Jill E Karp Trustees?
Find your warmest path to Karp Family Foundation Stephen R and Jill E Karp Trustees through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.