Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Fullgraf Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
166
Grants FY2025still arriving
22
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.

Education$9.9MArts & Culture$1.8MHealth$1.2MReligion$1.0MHousing & Shelter$1.0MEnvironment$811kFood & Nutrition$418kHuman Services$327kOther$0
02FY2025 · 166 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k114 grants · $339k
  • $10k–50k43 grants · $705k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $660k
  • $250k+2 grants · $1.3M
$4,000
Median grant
22
States reached
$35M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RENSSELAER POLYTECHNIC INSTITUTE$1,000,000
TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE$250,000
PRESIDENT & TRUSTEES OF COLBY COLLEGE$150,000
FRANCES PERKINS CENTER$150,000
THE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOLS$125,000
NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION FOR SHELTER INC$75,000
CINCINNATI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$60,000
FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY$50,000
CINCINNATI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL$50,000
ST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH$43,000
IJAMS NATURE CENTER INC$32,000
SHANGRI LA THERAPEUTIC ACADEMY OF RIDING INC$30,750
HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL$30,000
CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ASSOCIATION$30,000
GREENSPACES$30,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $253k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $5k → 5%SANCTUARY HOUSE: $3k → 16%URBAN PROMISE MINISTRIES COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT INC: $1k → 12%GOOD PROJECT CORP: $5k → 8%GIVING ALTERNATIVE LEARNERS UPLIFTING OPPORTUNITIE: $5k → 13%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $4k → 5%FRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10k → 11%SANCTUARY HOUSE: $1k → 16%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $3k → 5%FRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $10k → 11%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $3k → 5%RIVERWOOD THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $3k → 15%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 5%RIVERWOOD THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $3k → 15%PATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS: $2k → 5%RIVERWOOD THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $3k → 15%RIVERWOOD THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $2k → 15%RIVERWOOD THERAPEUTIC RIDING CENTER INC: $2k → 15%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC: $4k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC: $4k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC: $4k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC: $3k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC: $3k → 17%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK INC: $2k → 17%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK INC: $2k → 17%FRIENDS OF ISLAND ACADEMY INC: $2k → 17%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK INC: $2k → 17%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK INC: $2k → 17%YOUTH JUSTICE NETWORK INC: $2k → 17%FRIENDS OF ISLAND ACADEMY INC: $1k → 17%FRIENDS OF ISLAND ACADEMY INC: $1k → 17%SPENCE-CHAPIN SERVICES TO FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $2k → 17%SPENCE-CHAPIN SERVICES TO FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $2k → 17%SEARCH AND CARE INC: $20k → 17%SPENCE-CHAPIN SERVICES TO FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $2k → 17%SPENCE-CHAPIN SERVICES TO FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $2k → 17%SPENCE-CHAPIN SERVICES TO FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $2k → 17%SPENCE-CHAPIN SERVICES TO FAMILIES AND CHILDREN: $2k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC: $3k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC: $2k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC: $2k → 17%HEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC: $2k → 17%RESTORE NYC INC: $20k → 17%RESTORE NYC INC: $20k → 17%RESTORE NYC INC: $20k → 17%RESTORE NYC INC: $20k → 17%RESTORE NYC INC: $20k → 17%RESTORE NYC INC: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ME
VT
IL
WI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
SC
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 6% of The Fullgraf Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

The Fullgraf Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.0% directed abroad (not shown)

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$17M · 158 repeat orgs$157k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

158 repeat relationships — 130 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

158
29

Total granted

$17M
$61k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+44%
+28%

Still filing today

92%
69%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $96k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentHuman ServicesHealthAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TT
    THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE
    9× · 2017–2025 · $3.2M · revenue +52%
  • WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $2.2M · revenue +76%
  • Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute
    9× · 2017–2025 · $1.6M · revenue +25%

Funded once

  • TW
    TENNESSEE WESLEYAN UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +49%
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +21%
  • GA
    GIVING ALTERNATIVE LEARNERS UPLIFTING OPPORTUNITIES INC
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +23%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
2
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
3
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
4
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
5
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
6
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
7
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
8
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

—
9
Fordham University

Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.

Education
10
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
11
Eastern National

Eastern national promotes the public's understanding and support of america's national parks and other public trust partners by providing quality educational experiences, products and services.

Recreation & Sports
12
Native Plant Trust Inc

The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Park Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Promoting Animal Welfare in North Carolina. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyIndependent K-12 SchoolsFood Banks and PantriesOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Local History MuseumsFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Volunteer Fire & Ems Servic…Community Arts CentersPublic Library OperationsSchool Parent OrganizationsPregnancy Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Animal Rescue and ShelterChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…Christian Missionary Organi…Youth Development CentersSenior Support ServicesCancer Support ServicesMilitary Veterans SupportEquine Therapy ProgramsElementary Literacy TutoringHealth Access Advocacy and …Domestic Violence ServicesEnvironmental Conservation …Community Foundations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%1%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%11%10–20yr16%28%20–35yr13%30%35–55yr16%27%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%8%20–35yr13%22%35–55yr16%62%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 1% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/196
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,369

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

185 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 185 of the 209 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
48
Early backer (in before they grew)
182/185
Grantees still filing
141/185
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $3,191,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGEWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $2,152,000 · EducationWASHINGTON UNIVERSITYRensselaer Polytechnic Institute — $1,640,000 · EducationRensselaer Polytechnic InstituteIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,053,000 · EducationIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONCINCINNATI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $470,000 · EducationTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL — $375,000 · Education+26 more — $1,053,050 · Education+26 moreFRANCES PERKINS CENTER — $652,000 · Arts & CultureFRANCES PE…EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC — $423,000 · Arts & CultureEAA AVIATI…THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM — $125,000 · Arts & CultureTHE STUDIO…NEW YORK YOUTH SYMPHONY INC — $125,000 · Arts & CultureNEW YORK Y…Cincinnati Opera Association Inc — $90,000 · Arts & Culture+18 more — $277,100 · Arts & Culture+18 moreST JAMES EPISCOPAL CHURCH — $654,000 · OtherST JAMES EPISCOPAL…THE INDIAN HILL CHURCH — $112,000 · OtherALZHEIMER'S DISEASE AND RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIAT — $111,000 · OtherHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL — $210,000 · OtherHELEN KELLER INTER…FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $225,000 · OtherFOOD BANK FOR NEW …+88 more — $1,585,550 · Other+88 moreNEIGHBORHOOD COALITION FOR SHELTER INC — $940,000 · Housing & ShelterNAZARETH HOUSING INC — $45,000 · Housing & Shelter+2 more — $30,600 · Housing & ShelterIJAMS NATURE CENTER INC — $196,000 · EnvironmentCINCINNATI NATURE CENTER — $170,000 · EnvironmentGREENSPACES INC — $170,000 · EnvironmentMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $31,000 · Environment+21 more — $195,300 · EnvironmentSHANGRI-LA THERAPEUTIC ACADEMY OF RIDING INC — $247,750 · HealthAmerican Diabetes Association — $233,000 · HealthEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHEAST TENNESS — $143,000 · HealthJOURNEY FORWARD INC — $46,000 · Health+6 more — $42,550 · HealthRESTORE NYC INC — $190,000 · Human ServicesEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $163,200 · Human ServicesHEALTH ADVOCATES FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC — $27,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDS OF BOCA GRANDE COMMUNITY CENTER INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesSEARCH AND CARE INC — $20,000 · Human ServicesPATRIOT PAWS SERVICE DOGS — $18,000 · Human Services+7 more — $68,700 · Human Services
Education$9,934,050Arts & Culture$1,692,100Other$2,897,550Housing & Shelter$1,015,600Environment$762,300Health$712,300Human Services$506,900

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE — $3,191,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetWASHINGTON UNIVERSITY — $2,152,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRensselaer Polytechnic Institute — $1,640,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetIOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $1,053,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetNEIGHBORHOOD COALITION FOR SHELTER INC — $940,000 over 9y, 5.9% of budgetFRANCES PERKINS CENTER — $652,000 over 7y, 11% of budgetCINCINNATI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL — $470,000 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetEAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC — $423,000 over 9y, 1.1% of budgetTHE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL — $375,000 over 9y, 0.3% of budgetSHANGRI-LA THERAPEUTIC ACADEMY OF RIDING INC — $247,750 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetThe President and Trustees of Colby College — $239,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association — $233,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $225,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetHELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL — $210,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetIJAMS NATURE CENTER INC — $196,000 over 9y, 1.9% of budgetVanderbilt University — $191,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetRESTORE NYC INC — $190,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetCINCINNATI NATURE CENTER — $170,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetGREENSPACES INC — $170,000 over 8y, 4.1% of budgetEPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT — $163,200 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetEPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHEAST TENNESS — $143,000 over 9y, 13% of budgetTHE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM — $125,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetNEW YORK YOUTH SYMPHONY INC — $125,000 over 5y, 5.4% of budgetBERRY COLLEGE INC — $124,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations — $120,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED — $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC — $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetCincinnati Opera Association Inc — $90,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetREMOTE AREA MEDICAL — $84,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetTRINITY COLLEGE — $82,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetEPISCOPAL CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF NEW YORK — $80,000 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHONORAIR - KNOXVILLE INC — $69,000 over 9y, 10% of budgetFoundation for Tennessee Chess — $55,000 over 6y, 4.9% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC — $55,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetFOOTHILLS CRAFT GUILD INC — $53,000 over 9y, 20% of budgetHEALING STRIDES OF VIRGINIA — $50,000 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetJOURNEY FORWARD INC — $46,000 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetSylvan Winds Inc — $46,000 over 9y, 9.9% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society — $45,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetNAZARETH HOUSING INC — $45,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetIndian Hill Historical Museum Associatio — $45,000 over 9y, 3.1% of budgetNATIONAL PARK FOUNDATION — $43,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN RADIO RELAY LEAGUE INC — $38,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetThe Laundromat Project Inc — $35,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetBOCA GRANDE HEALTH CLINIC FNDTN INC — $34,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetMIKEROWEWORKS FOUNDATION — $32,500 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHorace Mann School — $31,500 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI BOTANICAL GARDEN BOARD OF TRUSTEES — $31,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute ↗
  • Who funds IOWA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORHOOD COALITION FOR SHELTER INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCES PERKINS CENTER ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds EAA AVIATION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SEVEN HILLS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SHANGRI-LA THERAPEUTIC ACADEMY OF RIDING INC ↗
  • Who funds The President and Trustees of Colby College ↗
  • Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
  • Who funds FOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY ↗
  • Who funds HELEN KELLER INTERNATIONAL ↗
  • Who funds IJAMS NATURE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Vanderbilt University ↗
  • Who funds RESTORE NYC INC ↗
  • Who funds CINCINNATI NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds GREENSPACES INC ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL RELIEF AND DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds EPILEPSY FOUNDATION OF SOUTHEAST TENNESS ↗
  • Who funds THE STUDIO MUSEUM IN HARLEM ↗
  • Who funds NEW YORK YOUTH SYMPHONY INC ↗
  • Who funds BERRY COLLEGE INC ↗
  • Who funds The New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations ↗
  • Who funds HOSPICE OF CINCINNATI INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds THE OSBORNE ASSOCIATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Cincinnati Opera Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds REMOTE AREA MEDICAL ↗
  • Who funds TRINITY COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds EPISCOPAL CHARITIES OF THE DIOCESE OF NEW YORK ↗
  • Who funds HONORAIR - KNOXVILLE INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Tennessee Chess ↗
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF TENNESSEE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOOTHILLS CRAFT GUILD INC ↗
  • Who funds HEALING STRIDES OF VIRGINIA ↗
  • Who funds JOURNEY FORWARD INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Hyde and Watson F…The New York Communit…Memorial Foundation I…Booth Ferris Foundati…The Achelis & Bodman …Lily Auchincloss Foun…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Rose M Badgeley Chari…Dorothy Cate and Thom…Pinkerton FoundationThe Steven & Laurie E…Vanderbilt University
The Hyde and Watson FoundationNJ29.6× affinity15 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Memorial Foundation Inc · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · The Achelis & Bodman Foundation Co Manice & Budd LLP · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Rose M Badgeley Charitable Trust 10-214890 · Dorothy Cate and Thomas F Frist Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The Steven & Laurie Eskind Family Foundation · Vanderbilt University

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Fullgraf Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 130%3%10%23%40%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Journey Forward Inc — 20% of income from government
  • The Coral Restoration Foundation Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Kingdom Trail Association Inc — 14% of income from government
  • The Trustees of Reservations — 2% of income from government
  • The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
  • Appalachian Mountain Club — 1% of income from government
  • Trinity College — 0% of income from government
  • Amherst College Trustees — 0% of income from government
  • Second Harvest Food Bank of Central Florida Inc — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
13get no government money at all
44report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 209 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines