Skip to content

California · Nonprofit

SLIDE RANCH

SLIDE RANCH (California) receives grants from 48 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,583,960 to it, the largest being THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ($356,029). 28 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 57% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2024
$1.0M
Funders on record
48
Grants received
$1.6M
Net assets
$1.8M
28/48 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 18%
01What it does

What Slide Ranch does

Mission

The mission of Slide Ranch is to connect children to nature. Slide Ranch cultivates healthy bodies and minds and fosters future generations of environmental stewards. By farming, cooking, caring for animals and exploring coastal wilderness, Slide Ranch teaches people

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The school and community group program is Slide Ranchs primary education program, providing day and overnight field trip programs to san francisco bay area school groups and community organizations to over 4,000 participants annually. For many participants, this will be their first time seeing the ocean and exploring tidepools, camping under the stars, harvesting food, or milking a goat. Student engagement is assured by teaching in small group sizes of eight engagement is assured by teaching in small group sizes of eight education curriculum connects children to nature and aligns with california education standards

    $665,698 spent$704,202 earned by the program
    61% of program spending
  2. Each year, seven interns are selected from a highly competitive group of applicants to participate in an eleven-month residential teaching internship; four additional interns come for a three-month summer internship. Slide Ranchs teachers-in-residence program provides intensive professional teacher training in all aspects of outdoor environmental education, stewardship, and sustainable agriculture. Interns live and work at the ranch, planning and leading experiential environmental education programs for over 8,000 program participants each year. Teachers-in-residence also learn how to operate a sustainable farm, including growing and harvesting food, land stewardship and best practices in animal husbandry.

    $427,117 spent
    39% of program spending

The 2 programs described on its FY2023 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,092,815.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($1.8M) Expenses 100 ($1.7M) Net assets 100 ($2.4M)2018 Revenue 85 ($1.5M) Expenses 92 ($1.6M) Net assets 96 ($2.3M)2019 Revenue 81 ($1.4M) Expenses 93 ($1.6M) Net assets 88 ($2.2M)2020 Revenue 82 ($1.4M) Expenses 85 ($1.5M) Net assets 87 ($2.1M)2021 Revenue 109 ($1.9M) Expenses 85 ($1.5M) Net assets 104 ($2.6M)2022 Revenue 68 ($1.2M) Expenses 75 ($1.3M) Net assets 100 ($2.4M)2023 Revenue 75 ($1.3M) Expenses 86 ($1.5M) Net assets 93 ($2.3M)2024 Revenue 59 ($1.0M) Expenses 86 ($1.5M) Net assets 74 ($1.8M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (59)Expenses (86)Net assets (74)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2020 to 2021, from $2.4M to $2.9M (+21%).

$2.6M
$2.4M
$2.2M
$2.4M
$2.9M
$2.8M
$2.5M
$2.1M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2018 0% · 2019 1% · 2020 13% · 2021 17% · 2022 5% · 2023 6% · 2024 13%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

32% of SLIDE RANCH’s revenue is contributions — more earned-revenue than three-quarters of its peers (88% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,293 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 6 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$23k
’17
−$95k
’18
−$196k
’19
−$39k
’20
$438k
’21
−$105k
’22
−$183k
’23
−$452k
’24
4.6
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

The chief executive listed changed between the FY2023 and FY2024 filings.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed1412121199911
Joined·+0+4+2+0+0+0+8
No longer listed·2432006
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 17 funders, grant income fell $320k → $202k.

12 of 48 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 57% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of SLIDE RANCH’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 48 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

SLIDE RANCH has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 22% of grant income, and it takes 4 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 4 funders to its left

62% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund SLIDE RANCH.

22%
largest funder
45%
top three
~11
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 37% · 2018 24% · 2019 27% · 2020 21% · 2021 29% · 2022 34% · 2023 25% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

41% of SLIDE RANCH's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 58% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y+6y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

57% of SLIDE RANCH's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $679k that is directly attributable, 54% of it comes from California funders.

WA
MN
WI
NY
MA
NV
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CA
MO
DE
MS

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
California out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $905k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

SLIDE RANCH's revenue fell 41% between 2017 and 2024.

Operating margin−44% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve4.6mo · below the median
Revenue growth (annualized)−7% · bottom quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 2,186 environment nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Organizations like SLIDE RANCH

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In California

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

75% of spending goes to programs.

Program 75%Management 11%Fundraising 14%

Governance

8
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

CA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for SLIDE RANCH: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds SLIDE RANCH?
SLIDE RANCH (California) receives grants from 48 organizations whose IRS filings report $1,583,960 to it, the largest being THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ($356,029). 28 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 57% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does SLIDE RANCH have?
IRS filings report 48 organizations giving $1,583,960 in grants to SLIDE RANCH, 28 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of SLIDE RANCH?
THE SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $356,029 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like SLIDE RANCH find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in California. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Slide Ranch →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 48 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing