· Private foundation
Rose M Badgeley Charitable Trust 10-214890
Its FY2026 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2026.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2026
- $10k–50k29 grants · $798k
- $50k–250k21 grants · $1.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LUPUS RESEARCH INSTITUTE | $150,000 |
| SERVICE PROGRAM FOR OLDER PEOPLE | $120,000 |
| CATHEDRAL CHURCH OF ST JOHN | $100,000 |
| EXTREME KIDS AND CREW INC | $80,000 |
| NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER | $66,000 |
| REFLECTION HOUSE INC | $65,000 |
| GREEN-WOOD HISTORIC FUND | $55,000 |
| YESHIVA UNIVERSITY | $51,700 |
| CONCERTS IN MOTION INC | $50,000 |
| ST LUKE'S ARTS EDUCATION | $50,000 |
| ROSWELL PARK ALLIANCE FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION | $50,000 |
| HOOK ARTS MEDIA INC | $50,000 |
| TEACHERS COLLEGE COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY | $50,000 |
| NYU LANGONE HOSPITALS | $50,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–26, $1.2M) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
67 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2026, 38 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2026 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2026, 57% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $924k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ESELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER4× · 2021–2025 · $302k · revenue +14%
- NCNORTHSIDE CENTER FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC2× · 2024–2025 · $300k · revenue +2%
- TCTeachers College Columbia University2× · 2025–2026 · $225k · revenue +7%
Funded once
- BABRIDGING ACCESS TO CARE INCone grant, 2025 · $150k · revenue 0%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $150k
- NFNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INCone grant, 2024 · $150k · revenue 0%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Nysci's mission is to nurture generations of passionate learners, critical thinkers, and active citizens through design make play - an approach to learning and engagement that is deeply rooted in research on stem learning and guides the…
From classrooms to careers, studio in a school expands access to visual arts education and professions in the arts by partnering with practicing artists, schools, and cultural institutions.
The mission of the brooklyn conservatory of music is to transformlives and build community through the expressive, educational andtherapeutic powers of music.
Manhattan school of music is deeply committed to excellence in education, performance, and creative activity; to the humanity of the school's environment; and to the cultural enrichment of the larger community. a premiere international…
The graduate center foundation is committed to promoting and safe-guarding the success of the graduate center by raising funds and managing and investing donations for use by the graduate center. the board of trustees of the foundation…
The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…
Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.
School in the square ("s2") engages, educates and empowers adolescents to respond mindfully and creatively to life's opportunities and challenges. s2 is a place where students, families and educators are seen, heard, and inspired and where…
For more than a century, diller-quaile has offered an environment where music can flourish in all its aspects, enriching the lives of students of all ages and cultural backgrounds. the belief that music is a fundamental part of human life…
"citizens of culture and courage"committed to bilingual french and american education of the highest standard, our mission is to prepare students of many origins to be thinkers, innovators and leaders, at home in the world. we inspire and…
The masters school celebrates active participation, deep understanding, and meaningful connection. a community of diverse individuals, we gather to learn, to strive, to dare, to do - to be a power for good in the world.
To provide access to high-quality music education for anyone who seeks it, regardless of economic status, ability level, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, or religious affiliation.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Partnership With Children Inc and the most unlike its peers is Liberty Fund Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 41 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
106 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 106 of the 141 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ELIZABETH SETON PEDIATRIC CENTER ↗
- Who funds NORTHSIDE CENTER FOR CHILD DEVELOPMENT INC ↗
- Who funds EXALT YOUTH ↗
- Who funds Teachers College Columbia University ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BLOOD CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERSHIP TO END ADDICTION ↗
- Who funds SERVICE PROGRAM FOR OLDER PEOPLE INC ↗
- Who funds CARE FOR THE HOMELESS ↗
- Who funds REEL STORIES TEEN FILMMAKING INC ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
- Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
- Who funds BRIDGING ACCESS TO CARE INC ↗
- Who funds OUTREACH PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC ↗
- Who funds SAFE HORIZON INC ↗
- Who funds Extreme Kids and Crew Inc ↗
- Who funds CITY HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds STRIVE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds METROPOLITAN CENTER FOR MENTAL HEALTH INC ↗
- Who funds DOROT INC ↗
- Who funds BAND OF PARENTS INC ↗
- Who funds QUEENS COMMUNITY HOUSE ↗
- Who funds BROOKLYN YOUTH CHORUS ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds THE YOUNG MEN'S AND YOUNG WOMEN'S HEBREW ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds SEARCH AND CARE INC ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION THROUGH MUSIC INC ↗
- Who funds SUMMER SEARCH ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN FEDERATION FOR AGING RESEARCH INC ↗
- Who funds BRONX CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds EAST SIDE HOUSE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Hyde and Watson Foundation · Pinkerton Foundation · The Jean & Louis Dreyfus Foundation Inc · Robin Hood Foundation · The New York Community Trust · Booth Ferris Foundation Xxxxx4008 · Mother Cabrini Health Foundation Inc · The Barker Welfare Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Altman Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Lily Auchincloss Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Rose M Badgeley Charitable Trust 10-214890 funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.