· Private foundation
The Dreiseszun Family Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k15 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $551k
- $50k–250k24 grants · $2.8M
- $250k+6 grants · $2.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PHOENIX COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL | $510,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO | $500,000 |
| LEUKEMIA & LYMPHOMA SOCIETY | $330,250 |
| THE SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH & RESOURCE CENTER | $300,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $275,500 |
| CITY OF PHOENIX PEDIATRIC HEALTHCARE INITIATIVE | $250,000 |
| PRESENT NOW | $238,830 |
| JEWISH NATIONAL FUND | $225,000 |
| CROSSROADS SCHOOL | $211,385 |
| TEMPLE SINAI | $200,000 |
| LIBERTY IN NORTH KOREA | $175,000 |
| ARIZONA JEWISH HISTORICAL SOCIETY | $167,000 |
| MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST | $165,280 |
| NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH | $155,000 |
| BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 80% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 28% of The Dreiseszun Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
63 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 16 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $646k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPHOENIX COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL5× · 2020–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +49%
- SASOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER5× · 2020–2024 · $900k · revenue +57%
NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH5× · 2020–2024 · $675k · revenue +13%
Funded once
- CACURE ADDICTION NOW CANone grant, 2022 · $225k · revenue -53%
- NGNEST GLOBAL (FORMERLY PILAGLOBAL)one grant, 2023 · $167k
- CCLAREMATRIXone grant, 2021 · $125k · revenue -31%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…
Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…
Strengthening the community by providing behavioral health, healthcare and social services to all ages, faiths and backgrounds.
To lead, serve and collaborate to mobilize enduring philanthropy for a better arizona.
The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
To advance cures and treatment of childhood cancer and other rare diseases.
The fsmb serves as the voice for state medical boards, supporting them through education, assessment, research and advocacy while providing services and initiatives that promote patient safety, quality health care and regulatory best…
The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
We steward $1.5 billion in charitable assets through donor-advised funds, endowments, and other giving vehicles. partnering with 1,400 individuals, families, and organizations, we build enduring legacies and multigenerational impact. in…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is First Place Az and the most unlike its peers is Cultivating Cambodia Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
109 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 109 of the 154 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PHOENIX COUNTRY DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MORGAN STANLEY GLOBAL IMPACT FUNDING TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHWEST AUTISM RESEARCH AND RESOURCE CENTER ↗
- Who funds PRESENT NOW ↗
- Who funds JEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL JEWISH HEALTH ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS SCHOOL FOR ARTS AND SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds LINK GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds FIRST PLACE AZ ↗
- Who funds JEWISH COMMUNITY CENTER OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Colorado Foundation ↗
- Who funds HABITS OF WASTE ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds CHARLIES HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds THE PROMISES FOUNDATION ATTN BRYAN MOELLER CHAIRMAN ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER KANSAS CITY ↗
- Who funds BARROW NEUROLOGICAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CURE ADDICTION NOW CAN ↗
- Who funds VILLAGE SHALOM INC ↗
- Who funds MICHAEL MAGRO FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds DENVER JEWISH DAY SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds Arizona Jewish Historical Society ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds UTAH FILM CENTER ↗
- Who funds JIMMY MILLER MEMORIAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SHALOM PARK ↗
- Who funds CLAREMATRIX ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FAMILY SERVICE OF COLORADO INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Jewish Community Foundation of Greater Phoenix · Weingart Foundation · Greater Kansas City Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Arizona Community Foundation · Baby2baby · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Morgan Family Foundation · Friedel Family Foundation · Lowenstein Family Supporting Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Dreiseszun Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Pacific House Inc — 46% of income from government
- Coaching for Change Inc — 5% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.