Skip to content

Washington · Nonprofit

PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL

PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL (Washington) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $159,250 to it, the largest being GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($110,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 91% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.

Revenue FY2025
$68k
Funders on record
3
Grants received
$159k
Net assets
$120k
2/3 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 70%
01What it does

What Partnership for Philanthropic Planning South Sound Planned Giving Council does

Mission

The principle purpose is to provide a forum for information about planned giving, awareness of issues affecting the non-profit sector, and enhance planned giving as a profession.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

Program

  1. Programs for providing education, information and awareness about planned giving.

    $43,077 spent
    100% of program spending

The program described on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ. Program spending in total: $43,077.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2023, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2023, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20232023 Revenue 100 ($52k) Expenses 100 ($37k) Net assets 100 ($105k)2024 Revenue 126 ($65k) Expenses 104 ($38k) Net assets 111 ($117k)2025 Revenue 132 ($68k) Expenses 176 ($64k) Net assets 114 ($120k)
202320242025
Revenue (132)Expenses (176)Net assets (114)

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $105k to $117k (+11%).

$105k
$117k
$120k
202320242025
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 0 of the last 3 reported years ran a deficit.

$15k
’23
$27k
’24
$4k
’25

Leadership and staff

Chief executive

Darion Lespier-Greaves

Executive director

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990-EZ.

03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 1 funder to 2 funders, grant income rose $1k → $36k.

2 of 3 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 91% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL leans on a few funders — its largest provides 69% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

91% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL.

69%
largest funder
100%
top three
~2
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 100% · 2021 50% · 2022 71% · 2023 69% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

91% of PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL's grant income arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors, whose addresses record where the money is held rather than where the donor is. Of the $15k that is directly attributable, 100% of it comes from Washington funders.

WA

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $144k arriving through sponsors registered in 1 state is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Organizations like PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Washington

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Public support

100%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

WA

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL?
PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL (Washington) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $159,250 to it, the largest being GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ($110,000). 2 of them have funded it in more than one year, and 91% of the money arrives through donor-advised or pass-through sponsors rather than from an institution directly.
How many funders does PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL have?
IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $159,250 in grants to PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL, 2 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL?
GREATER TACOMA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $110,000 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like PARTNERSHIP FOR PHILANTHROPIC PLANNING SOUTH SOUND PLANNED GIVING COUNCIL find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Washington. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds Partnership for Philanthropic Planning South Sound Planned Giving Council →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2023–2025), and the filings of 3 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing