Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Chaney Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$135k
Granted FY2025still arriving
31
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$35k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$527kEducation$127kInternational$111kEnvironment$102kPublic Safety & Disaster$56kFood & Nutrition$31kHuman Services$24kHousing & Shelter$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k28 grants · $74k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $62k
$2,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$844k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BLOOD CANCER UNITED$35,000
ALS ASSOCIATION$16,500
LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY$10,000
HOSPICE PALLIATIVE CARE SERVICES$5,000
ALZHEIMER'S ASSOCIATION$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$5,000
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CEN$5,000
BREAKTHROUGH T1D$5,000
UPPER MISSOURI WATERKEEPER$5,000
ST JUDE'S CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPIT$5,000
CONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL$3,500
AUF INC$2,500
BUCKNELL UNIVERSITY$2,500
PARKINSONS FOUNDATION$2,500
AMERICAN RED CROSS$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $19k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 79% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%OUR COMMUNITY CARES INC: $250 → 11%SHELTERBOX USA: $2k → 9%SHELTERBOX USA: $2k → 9%FINGER LAKES INDEPENDANCE CENTER: $5k → 16%HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE: $10k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
MT
WI
NY
MA
IA
OH
PA
NJ
CT
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
KS
TN
NC
DC
HI
LA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 7% of The Chaney Family Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 13% of the giving stays in CT; read by stated purpose it is 11% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.

The Chaney Family Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$845k · 53 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.

53 repeat relationships — 21 still active in FY2025, 32 since wound down; 9 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

53
50

Total granted

$845k
$113k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+21%

Still filing today

62%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 52% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $65k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesInternationalEnvironmentFood & NutritionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UM
    Upper Missouri Waterkeeper Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $47k · revenue ×15
  • Bucknell University
    9× · 2017–2025 · $40k · revenue +45%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $39k · revenue +98%

Funded once

  • A
    ALS
    one grant, 2022 · $25k
  • HC
    HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue -43%
  • CC
    Compassionate Care ALS Inc
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Project Drawdown

Project drawdown's mission is to drive meaningful climate action by advancing science-based solutions and strategies. project drawdown's work is focused on three pillars: science - advancing science-based climate solutions and strategies;…

Education
2
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

3
Target Als Foundation Inc

Our mission is to break down barriers to als research to find effective treatments. by uniting academia, the pharma and biotech industry, government, venture capital, related nonprofits, and the als community, we aim to overcome the…

Education
4
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
5
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
6
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Foundation Inc

Susan g. komen has an unmatched, comprehensive 360-degree approach to fighting breast cancer across all fronts and supporting millions of people in the u.s. and in countries worldwide. we advocate for policies to protect patients, drive…

Health
7
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
8
Cystic Fibrosis Foundation

To cure cf and provide all people with cf the opportunity to lead long, fulfilling lives by funding research and drug development, partnering with the cf community, and advancing high-quality, specialized care.

Health
9
Management Sciences for Health Inc

(msh) saves lives and improves the health of the world's poorest (see schedule o) and most vulnerable people by closing the gap between knowledge and action in public health.

International
10
Clinton Health Access Initiative Inc

For over 20 years, chai's mission has been to save lives and improve health outcomes in low-and middle-income countries around the world. we do this by enabling the government and private sector to strengthen and sustain quality health…

International
11
The Union of Concerned Scientists Inc

The union of concerned scientists puts rigorous, independent science into action, developing solutions and advocating for a healthy, safe, and just future.

International
12
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Hospital Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Upper Missouri Waterkeeper Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyLand Conservation Organizat…Community FoundationsIndependent K-8 SchoolsDevelopmental Disabilities …Elementary Literacy TutoringPublic Library SupportChristian Missionary Organi…Education Equity LeadershipCommunity Health CentersAnimal Rescue and AdoptionVeteran Support ServicesEnvironmental Advocacy Orga…Substance Abuse TreatmentFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Food Pantries & AssistanceCancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%2%<5yr14%3%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr16%29%20–35yr13%26%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%3%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr16%19%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr16%33%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/72
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,493

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

70 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 70 of the 115 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
8
Early backer (in before they grew)
68/70
Grantees still filing
50/70
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETY — $172,000 · OtherLEUKEMIA LYMPHOMA SOCIETYMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CEN — $41,500 · OtherMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENBLOOD CANCER UNITED — $35,000 · OtherBLOOD CANCER UNITEDJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FND — $35,000 · OtherJUVENILE DIABETES RESEARCH FNDST JUDE'S CHILDRENS RESEARCH HOSPIT — $27,000 · OtherAUF INC — $25,500 · OtherALS — $25,000 · OtherDELBARTON SCHOOL — $24,000 · Other+61 more — $240,200 · Other+61 moreUpper Missouri Waterkeeper Inc — $46,500 · EducationUpper Missouri…Bucknell University — $40,000 · EducationBucknell Unive…SHAWN CARTER SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $16,500 · EducationSHAWN CARTER S…THE COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $9,000 · EducationTHE COUNTRY SC…DENISON UNIVERSITY — $9,000 · EducationDENISON UNIVER…DONORSCHOOSEORG — $6,005 · Education+5 more — $10,000 · Education+5 moreAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $34,500 · Human ServicesAmerican …TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Human ServicesTEAM GLEA…HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $10,000 · Human ServicesHARLEM CH…Compassionate Care ALS Inc — $5,000 · Human ServicesCompassio…FINGER LAKES INDEPENDENCE CENTER — $5,000 · Human ServicesFINGER LA…SHELTERBOX USA INC — $4,000 · Human ServicesWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $4,000 · Human Services+1 more — $250 · Human ServicesMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $39,000 · InternationalSave The Children Federation Inc — $13,500 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF — $6,500 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 · InternationalCONVOY OF HOPE — $4,500 · International+4 more — $6,100 · InternationalALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $25,500 · HealthBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 · HealthBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $10,000 · HealthPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc — $3,000 · Health+5 more — $5,500 · HealthNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $15,000 · EnvironmentSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $9,000 · EnvironmentSPLASH INTERNATIONAL — $6,000 · EnvironmentTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $3,500 · EnvironmentCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $3,500 · EnvironmentNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $11,500 · Food & NutritionFeeding America — $5,500 · Food & Nutrition+1 more — $500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$625,200Education$137,005Human Services$82,750International$75,600Health$61,500Environment$37,000Food & Nutrition$17,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUpper Missouri Waterkeeper Inc — $46,500 over 9y, 5.2% of budgetBucknell University — $40,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $39,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches — $34,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $25,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC — $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSHAWN CARTER SCHOLARSHIP FUND — $16,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC — $16,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE DOE FUND INC — $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC — $15,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc — $13,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK COMMON PANTRY — $11,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCLINTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC — $11,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBREAKTHROUGH T1D — $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED — $9,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDENISON UNIVERSITY — $9,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetSIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION — $9,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE VALERIE FUND — $7,500 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC — $7,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetDIRECT RELIEF — $6,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $6,005 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSPLASH INTERNATIONAL — $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFeeding America — $5,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCompassionate Care ALS Inc — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE BREAST CANCER RESEARCH FOUNDATION INC — $5,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFINGER LAKES INDEPENDENCE CENTER — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCONVOY OF HOPE — $4,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetREAD TO GROW INC — $4,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetSHELTERBOX USA INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTEAM RUBICON INC — $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC — $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CONSERVATION FUND A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCENTRAL PARK CONSERVANCY INC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCONSERVATION INTERNATIONAL FOUNDATION — $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGATES PHILANTHROPY PARTNERS — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetVOLUNTEER FLORIDA FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCOLLIER COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGUIDANCECARE CENTER INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYEAR UP INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC — $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCANCER RESEARCH INSTITUTE INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Upper Missouri Waterkeeper Inc
  • Who funds Bucknell University
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC
  • Who funds TEAM GLEASON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC
  • Who funds SHAWN CARTER SCHOLARSHIP FUND
  • Who funds ALS UNITED GREATER NEW YORK INC
  • Who funds THE DOE FUND INC
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc
  • Who funds NEW YORK COMMON PANTRY
  • Who funds CLINTON VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT INC
  • Who funds BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC
  • Who funds HARLEM CHILDREN'S ZONE INC
  • Who funds BREAKTHROUGH T1D
  • Who funds THE COUNTRY SCHOOL INCORPORATED
  • Who funds DENISON UNIVERSITY
  • Who funds SIERRA CLUB FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE VALERIE FUND
  • Who funds PARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds COMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF MIDDLESEX COUNTY INC
  • Who funds DIRECT RELIEF
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

AbbVie FoundationIL10.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: AbbVie Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Network for Good · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Chaney Family Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 110%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 0%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc30% of income from government
  • Volunteer Florida Foundation Inc2% of income from government
  • Clinton Volunteer Fire Department Inc1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation0% of income from government
  • Healing Meals Foundation Corporation0% of income from government
  • Year Up Inc0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc0% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
11get no government money at all
9report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Chaney Family Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Chaney Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 115 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph