· Private foundation
The Anjulicia Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k43 grants · $141k
- $10k–50k30 grants · $524k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.2M
- $250k+1 grant · $500k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FIRST STORY | $500,000 |
| HORIZON COMMUNITY CHURCH | $150,000 |
| MINDUP | $150,000 |
| THE GIVING PLATE | $150,000 |
| WESTSIDE CHURCH | $150,000 |
| SHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES | $102,500 |
| BETHLEHEM INN | $100,000 |
| ST VINCENT DE PAUL BEND | $75,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $75,000 |
| ABILITREE | $57,500 |
| JOURNEY CHURCH | $50,000 |
| SEVEN PEAKS SCHOOL FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| GUARDIAN GROUP | $50,000 |
| HEART OF OREGON CORP INC | $50,000 |
| J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $728k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 99% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +55% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
94 repeat relationships — 51 still active in FY2024, 43 since wound down; 36 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $386k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
First Story6× · 2017–2024 · $630k · revenue +76%- TGTHE GIVING PLATE5× · 2020–2024 · $560k · revenue +19%
- LALOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH2× · 2023–2024 · $305k · revenue +53%
Funded once
THE HUTTON SETTLEMENTone grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +18%- BABOYS AND GIRLS CLUB OF ST HELENACALISTOGAone grant, 2018 · $32k
- DHDAWNS HOUSE CORPORATION LLCone grant, 2021 · $25k · revenue -84%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.
Rogue Climate's mission is to empower Southern Oregon communities most impacted by climate change including low-income, rural, youth, seniors & communities of color, to win climate justice by organizing for clean energy, sustainable jobs &…
To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.
The oregon center for public policy's mission is to achieve economic justice for all oregonians through research, analysis, and advocacy. ocpp works to change policies that foster economic security and stability for all oregonians. we do…
Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…
Our mission is to empower, strengthen and sustain those impacted by cancer in our community through education, support and financial assistance.
Oregon research institute is an independent behavioral sciences research center dedicated to understanding human behavior and improving the quality of human life through the prevention and treatment of health, educational, and social…
To ensure children and youth in oregon have access to high quality, comprehensive services and resources to address child abuse.
Promote economic and social fairness by working in coalition open a broad range of issues and activities in the public arena
To lead oregon's casa programs to provide a strong voice for every abused and neglected child
Northeast Oregon Network (the Organization) is a non-profit organization established to create a healthier Oregon by reducing barriers for both residents and regional systems that support their health. The Organization fulfills its mission…
Cascades academy is an engaged, vibrant community that weaves challenging academics with experiential learning to inspire socially responsible individuals ready for a diverse and changing world.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery and the most unlike its peers is Hearts and Hands for Humanity. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 24 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
165 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 165 of the 240 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
- Who funds First Story ↗
- Who funds THE GIVING PLATE ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES HOUSE OF RUTH ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds MAURICE LUCAS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds STREET DOG HERO ↗
- Who funds SEVEN PEAKS SCHOOL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY ↗
- Who funds THE OFFICE GROUP ↗
- Who funds RIVERSTONE INTERNATIONAL SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds HEART OF OREGON CORPS INC ↗
- Who funds SHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
- Who funds CONFLUENCE HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds GUARDIAN GROUP ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN DOWN SYNDROME ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH ↗
- Who funds STROKE AWARENESS OREGON ↗
- Who funds SEVEN PEAKS SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
- Who funds Family Access Network Foundation ↗
- Who funds FURNISH HOPE INC ↗
- Who funds ABILITREE ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN- CENTRAL OREGON ↗
- Who funds KIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds OREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS ↗
- Who funds J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds Children's Cancer Association ↗
- Who funds THE HUTTON SETTLEMENT ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Roundhouse Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · St Charles Health System Inc · The Ford Family Foundation · United Way of Deschutes County · Bend Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · The Collins Foundation · Juan Young Trust
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Anjulicia Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Deschutes River Conservancy — 100% of income from government
- J Bar J Youth Services Inc — 71% of income from government
- Neighborimpact — 68% of income from government
- Northwest Youth Discovery — 63% of income from government
- Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery — 60% of income from government
- Grant County Cybermill — 55% of income from government
- Wild Salmon Center — 49% of income from government
- Saving Grace — 48% of income from government
- Deschutes Land Trust — 46% of income from government
- Central Oregon Veterans Ranch — 45% of income from government
- Abilitree — 44% of income from government
- Bridge Meadows — 36% of income from government
- Heart of Oregon Corps Inc — 28% of income from government
- Dawns House Corporation Llc — 27% of income from government
- Friends of the Children- Central Oregon — 16% of income from government
- Project Lemonade Inc — 15% of income from government
- Thrive Central Oregon — 12% of income from government
- Healing Reins Equine Assisted Services Inc — 11% of income from government
- Oregon Natural Desert Association — 9% of income from government
- McKenzie River Trust — 8% of income from government
- Tower Theatre Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
- Tuality Healthcare Foundation — 3% of income from government
- Deschutes Public Library Foundation Inc — 2% of income from government
- The Oregon Community Foundation — 2% of income from government
- Casa of Central Oregon — 2% of income from government
- Oregon Natural Resources Council Fund Oregon Wild — 2% of income from government
- Central Oregon Trail Alliance — 1% of income from government
- Desert Sky Montessori — 1% of income from government
- Central Oregon Environmental Center Inc Dba - the Environmental Center — 0% of income from government
- First Story — 0% of income from government
- Western Rivers Conservancy — 0% of income from government
- Bethlehem Inn — 0% of income from government
- Serenity Lane — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Anjulicia Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Anjulicia Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.