Skip to content

Oregon · Nonprofit

IN OUR BACKYARD

IN OUR BACKYARD (Oregon) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $579,064 to it, the largest being M J MURDOCK CHARITABLE TRUST ($161,750). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2025
$708k
Funders on record
24
Grants received
$579k
Net assets
$722k
12/24 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 49%
01What it does

What In Our Backyard does

Mission

The Organization provides support in human trafficking through awareness, education, outreach events, survivor advocacy, legislative advising and engagement of key partners across America.

As stated on its FY2025 Form 990.

Programs

  1. The purpose of our programs is to take awareness and turn it into action. We accomplish this through training, presentation, legislative advising, prevention education and survivor advocacy. We provide awareness and prevention education to middle and high school students to keep them from being trafficked. We travel the country training and speaking to educate and mobilize the public around human trafficking. We connect survivors to vital services in their process of recovery. We also testify and provide advisement on legislative issues surrounding human trafficking.

    $110,570 spent
    42% of program spending
  2. The Organization manages a Convenience Stores Against Trafficking program its mission is to engage the industry in the fight against human trafficking. The stores are uniquely positioned to recognize and safely report human trafficking in the communities they serve. The stores serve half the U.S. population every day, have longer hours of operation, and victims have described visiting the stores as part of their daily routines. This program is leading to tangible reports of recovery of victims and increased awareness.

    $81,950 spent
    31% of program spending
  3. In connection with our year-round anti-trafficking work, the Organization conducts a 10-day anti-trafficking operation surrounding major national sporting events in host cities across America. Each year missing children and victims of trafficking are recovered due to the tips generated from the Organizations work. The purpose of the Organizations work surrounding major national sporting events is to engage with law enforcement, faith and advocacy groups, nonprofits and government agencies in the host city to raise awareness of human trafficking and empower the community with a safe and tangible way to take well-informed, meaningful action to stop human trafficking.

    $38,790 spent
    15% of program spending
  4. Program Service Expenses 34,700, Grants and allocations 0, Revenue 0 The purpose of Freedom Stickers is to bring public awareness and a lifeline of hope to victims of human trafficking. Not only are Freedom Stickers the number one way to increase arrests of traffickers according to research, but they also allow trafficking victims a chance at recovery since a public restroom is one of the only places victims are alone and safe enough to call for help. Freedom Stickers are placed in all states.

    $34,700 spent
    13% of program spending

The 4 programs described on its FY2025 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $266,010.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($253k) Expenses 100 ($149k) Net assets 100 ($185k)2018 Revenue 83 ($209k) Expenses 148 ($221k) Net assets 94 ($173k)2019 Revenue 219 ($553k) Expenses 201 ($299k) Net assets 233 ($431k)2020 Revenue 105 ($265k) Expenses 186 ($278k) Net assets 226 ($419k)2021 Revenue 166 ($420k) Expenses 237 ($353k) Net assets 262 ($485k)2022 Revenue 98 ($248k) Expenses 203 ($302k) Net assets 222 ($411k)2023 Revenue 110 ($278k) Expenses 176 ($261k) Net assets 231 ($427k)2024 Revenue 136 ($343k) Expenses 216 ($321k) Net assets 243 ($449k)2025 Revenue 280 ($708k) Expenses 224 ($334k) Net assets 390 ($722k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (280)Expenses (224)Net assets (390)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2024 to 2025, from $449k to $722k (+61%).

$193k
$173k
$432k
$419k
$490k
$411k
$427k
$449k
$722k
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2020 12% · 2021 8% · 2024 9%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

91% of IN OUR BACKYARD’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (94% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 2,778 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$104k
’17
−$12k
’18
$254k
’19
−$12k
’20
$66k
’21
−$53k
’22
$17k
’23
$22k
’24
$374k
’25
26
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Cheryl Csiky

Executive director

Board chair

Sherry Schwartz

Chairperson

As listed on its FY2025 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Listed81011101010999
Joined·+4+2+1+0+2+0+2+1
No longer listed·21202121
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 6 funders, grant income fell $74k → $15k.

8 of 24 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 10% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of IN OUR BACKYARD’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

IN OUR BACKYARD leans on a few funders — its largest provides 28% of grant income and the top three 76%; half comes from just 2 funders.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 2 funders to its left

28%
largest funder
76%
top three
~5
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 61% · 2018 95% · 2019 55% · 2020 58% · 2021 48% · 2022 55% · 2023 33% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

42% of IN OUR BACKYARD's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 50% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

IN OUR BACKYARD draws 61% of its grant income from funders outside Oregon, across 9 states in all.

WA
MT
MN
NY
OR
CT
CA
VA
GA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Oregon out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $55k arriving through sponsors registered in 8 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

IN OUR BACKYARD runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,547 crime & legal nonprofits its size.

Operating margin53% · top quartile
Months of reserve26.0mo · top quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)14% · above the median

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,547 crime & legal nonprofits $100k–$1M, FY2025

Organizations like IN OUR BACKYARD

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Oregon

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

80% of spending goes to programs.

Program 80%Management 8%Fundraising 13%

Governance

9
board members
89%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Footprint & structure

Files a return copy in 1 state

OR

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for IN OUR BACKYARD: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds IN OUR BACKYARD?
IN OUR BACKYARD (Oregon) receives grants from 24 organizations whose IRS filings report $579,064 to it, the largest being M J MURDOCK CHARITABLE TRUST ($161,750). 12 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does IN OUR BACKYARD have?
IRS filings report 24 organizations giving $579,064 in grants to IN OUR BACKYARD, 12 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of IN OUR BACKYARD?
M J MURDOCK CHARITABLE TRUST is the largest funder on record, with $161,750 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like IN OUR BACKYARD find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds In Our Backyard →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 24 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing