Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersMostly funded, not a grantmaker — see who funds it →
Plinth

· Public charity

St Charles Health System Inc

To own, manage and operate hospitals in Central Oregon, as well as the care of sick, injured and infirm and the carrying on, participation in and sponsorship of health-related services and activities in the communities.

$699k
Granted FY2024still arriving
42
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$5.1MHuman Services$707kFood & Nutrition$361kPublic Safety & Disaster$357kEducation$278kHousing & Shelter$209kRecreation & Sports$154kYouth Development$132kOther$0
02FY2024 · 42 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 42 grants below total $518,151 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $699,047 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $180,896 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k16 grants · $118k
  • $10k–50k26 grants · $401k
$11,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$1.5B
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST CHARLES FOUNDATION$37,465
KIDS CENTER$28,000
BEND LAPINE SCHOOL DISTRICT$22,561
DESTINATION REHAB$20,000
LATINO COMMUNITY ASSOC$17,500
Boys and Girls Club REDMOND$17,000
BETTER TOGETHER CENTRAL OR$16,365
HIGH DESERT FOOD AND FARM ALL$15,500
JEFFERSON COUNTY EMS$15,000
CO VETERANS RANCH$15,000
SRIPONYA$15,000
RIMROCK TRAILS ADOLESCENT TRE$15,000
NEWBERRY REGIONAL PARTNERSHIP$15,000
THE PEACEFUL PRESENCE PROJECT$14,885
PARTNERS IN CARE HOSPICE$14,720
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $672k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%LATINO COMMUNITY ASSOC: $20k → 10%SOROPTIMIST INTERNATIONAL OF: $15k → 11%REDMPTION HOUSE MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%CASA OF CENTRAL OR: $10k → 10%REDMPTION HOUSE MINISTRIES: $10k → 11%REDMOND OASIS VILLAGE PROJECT: $8k → 11%CASA OF CENTRAL OR: $8k → 10%LATINO COMMUNITY ASSOC: $7k → 10%PRINEVILLE SNR CENTER TRUST: $7k → 11%NEIGHBORIMPACT: $21k → 10%BETTER TOGETHER CENTRAL OR: $16k → 10%BETTER TOGETHER CENTRAL OR: $15k → 10%NEIGHBORIMPACT: $11k → 10%MOUNTAIN VIEW COMMUNITY DEVEL: $10k → 10%NEIGHBORIMPACT: $8k → 10%FAMILIES FORWARD: $8k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE HOSPICE: $100k → 10%CO COUNCIL ON AGING: $36k → 10%CO COUNCIL ON AGING: $30k → 10%CO COUNCIL ON AGING: $25k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF: $20k → 10%LATINO COMMUNITY ASSOC: $18k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK FOUND: $18k → 10%CO COUNCIL ON AGING: $17k → 10%SAVING GRACE: $15k → 10%CO COUNCIL ON AGING: $15k → 10%PARTNERS IN CARE HOSPICE: $15k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK FOUND: $14k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF: $13k → 10%CO COUNCIL ON AGING: $13k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK FOUND: $13k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $11k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF: $11k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF: $10k → 10%SAVING GRACE: $10k → 10%CO COUNCIL ON AGING: $10k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK FOUND: $10k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $9k → 10%SAVING GRACE: $9k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK: $9k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF: $8k → 10%MOUNTAIN STAR FAMILY RELIEF: $8k → 10%SAVING GRACE: $8k → 10%LATINO COMMUNITY ASSOC: $8k → 10%FAMILY ACCESS NETWORK FOUND: $7k → 10%CO COUNCIL ON AGING: $6k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.4M · 55 repeat orgs$1.3M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +83% since the first grant, against +33% for the ones you funded once.

55 repeat relationships — 27 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
33

Total granted

$6.4M
$1.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+83%
+33%

Still filing today

73%
67%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 69% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $161k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesCommunity ImprovementEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES
    4× · 2018–2021 · $497k · revenue +167%
  • YOUTH VILLAGES INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $259k · revenue +124%
  • COUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON
    8× · 2017–2024 · $151k · revenue +72%

Funded once

  • OA
    OREGON ASSOCIATION OF HOSPITALS RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2019 · $583k · revenue -96%
  • CC
    CROOK COUNTY FIRE AND RESCUE
    one grant, 2021 · $100k
  • CC
    CROOK COUNTY FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $31k · revenue +60%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oregon Council for Behavioral Health

We provide a voice for an effective and accessible behavioral health system of care for Oregonians.

Community Improvement
2
Oregon Energy Systems Technology and Research
Environment
3
Oregon Public Health Association

Advocate for policies that protect and promote healthy and health equity for all people in oregon and provide learning, collaboration and leadership opportunities for public health professionals and the broader community.

Health
4
Thrive Central Oregon

To connect individuals to the housing and community resources they seek.

Human Services
5
Central Oregon Disability Support Network Inc

To provide suppot, education, advocacy and resources to individuals and familys with disabilities

Health
6
Earth Day Oregon
—
7
Priority Oregon

To support public policies that will help oregon's economy and create new family supporting jobs in oregon.

—
8
Options for Southern Oregon

Programs for people of all ages who have mental health needs. Our holistic approach addresses housing, advocacy, community integration, crisis intervention, therapy, co-occuring issues, education, work & economic well-being

Health
9
Central Oregon Villages

Central oregon villages mission is to advocate for and provide safe and secure shelter, housing and related services in central oreogn for the unhoused populations or at risk of becoming unhoused.

Housing & Shelter
10
Center for Trauma Support Services

Provide crisis intervention and trauma healing and recovery services for victims and survivors of violent crime in the portland area

Human Services
11
Oregon Justice Network

Oregon Justice Network is an alliance built and staffed by criminal legal system impacted people advocating for the well-being of people affected or at-risk of being affected by carceral systems. Our work centers around restorative…

Human Services
12
Oregon Agricultural Trust

Oregon agricultural trust partners with farmers and ranchers to protect agricultural lands for the benefit of oregons economy, communities, and landscapes.

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery and the most unlike its peers is Stroke Awareness Oregon. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCentral Oregon Community De…Bend Community OrganizationsCentral Oregon Community Or…Community Support ServicesFaith-Based Social ServicesAnimal Rescue and CareYouth Sports ProgramsCentral Oregon Arts & Educa…Affordable Housing & Suppor…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 12. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%8%<5yr15%10%5–10yr24%18%10–20yr16%35%20–35yr9%25%35–55yr12%4%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%2%<5yr15%2%5–10yr24%6%10–20yr16%67%20–35yr9%22%35–55yr12%1%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 8% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
2%2/104
the rest of the field
13%
185/1,413

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

79 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 79 of the 104 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
30
Early backer (in before they grew)
74/79
Grantees still filing
51/79
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

St Charles Foundation Inc — $3,037,906 · HealthSt Charles Foundation IncVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES — $497,328 · HealthVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES+13 more — $303,552 · Health+13 moreOREGON ASSOCIATION OF HOSPITALS RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $582,802 · OtherOREGON ASSOCIATION OF HOSPITALS RE…CENTRAL OREGON INTERGOVERNMENTAL — $150,000 · OtherCENTRAL OREGON INTERGOVERNMENTALJEFFERSON COUNTY EMS — $136,496 · OtherJEFFERSON COUNTY EMSREDMOND FIRE & RESCUE — $120,170 · OtherCROOK COUNTY FIRE AND RESCUE — $100,000 · OtherKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER — $93,500 · Other+47 more — $1,163,371 · Other+47 moreYOUTH VILLAGES INC — $258,972 · Human ServicesYOUTH VILLAGE…COUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON — $151,120 · Human ServicesCOUNCIL ON AG…PARTNERS IN CARE — $114,720 · Human ServicesPARTNERS IN C…Family Access Network Foundation — $88,300 · Human ServicesFamily Access…MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY — $69,500 · Human ServicesMOUNTAINSTAR …LATINO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION — $51,745 · Human ServicesLATINO COMMUN…SAVING GRACE — $41,725 · Human ServicesNEIGHBORIMPACT — $39,000 · Human Services+6 more — $116,340 · Human Services+6 moreSHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES — $71,050 · Housing & ShelterBETHLEHEM INN — $47,500 · Housing & ShelterJERICHO ROAD INC — $45,450 · Housing & ShelterTHE GIVING PLATE — $48,495 · Food & NutritionSEED TO TABLE OREGON — $46,500 · Food & NutritionLA PINE COMMUNITY KITCHEN — $37,950 · Food & NutritionHigh Desert Food & Farm Alliance — $15,500 · Food & NutritionBEND FARMERS MARKET — $8,000 · Food & NutritionJEFFERSON COUNTY FAITH BASED NETWORK — $73,500 · EducationSMART READING — $10,000 · EducationOregon State University Foundation — $10,000 · EducationThe Foundation for Medical Excellence — $9,750 · EducationTHE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY — $8,500 · EducationSAMARA LEARNING CENTER — $7,000 · EducationTHE CENTER FOUNDATION — $5,480 · EducationCROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION — $30,500 · Community ImprovementCENTRAL OREGON MEDICAL SOCIETY — $20,000 · Community ImprovementCITIZENS4COMMUNITY — $18,100 · Community ImprovementNewberry Regional Partnership — $15,000 · Community ImprovementENVISION BEND — $11,500 · Community ImprovementROTARY CLUB OF REDMOND INC — $9,000 · Community ImprovementCOMMUTE OPTIONS — $7,500 · Community Improvement
Health$3,838,786Other$2,346,339Human Services$931,422Housing & Shelter$164,000Food & Nutrition$156,445Education$124,230Community Improvement$111,600

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSt Charles Foundation Inc — $3,037,906 over 6y, 49% of budgetOREGON ASSOCIATION OF HOSPITALS RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION — $582,802 over 1y, 19% of budgetVOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES — $497,328 over 4y, 19% of budgetYOUTH VILLAGES INC — $258,972 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCOUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON — $151,120 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE — $114,720 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetKIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER — $93,500 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetFamily Access Network Foundation — $88,300 over 8y, 2.0% of budgetJEFFERSON COUNTY FAITH BASED NETWORK — $73,500 over 5y, 7.6% of budgetSHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES — $71,050 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetMOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY — $69,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetMUSEUM AT WARM SPRINGS — $62,000 over 4y, 5.9% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH — $61,000 over 4y, 4.6% of budgetBENDNEXT — $53,500 over 5y, 8.4% of budgetTOUR DES CHUTES — $53,000 over 5y, 66% of budgetLines for Life — $53,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetLATINO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION — $51,745 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetBESTCARE TREATMENT SERVICES INC — $49,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BEND INC — $49,300 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetTHE GIVING PLATE — $48,495 over 6y, 0.6% of budgetBETHLEHEM INN — $47,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetSEED TO TABLE OREGON — $46,500 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetJERICHO ROAD INC — $45,450 over 6y, 5.4% of budgetSAVING GRACE — $41,725 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetLA PINE SENIOR CITIZENS INC — $40,300 over 2y, 8.3% of budgetRIMROCK TRAILS TREATMENT SERVICES — $40,125 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetNEIGHBORIMPACT — $39,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetLA PINE COMMUNITY KITCHEN — $37,950 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetJ BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC — $36,470 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDESTINATION REHAB — $33,900 over 3y, 12% of budgetBetter Together Central Oregon — $30,865 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetCROOK COUNTY FOUNDATION — $30,500 over 1y, 10% of budgetKEMPLE MEMORIAL CHILDREN'S CLINIC — $30,500 over 3y, 5.6% of budgetPRINEVILLE SENIOR CENTER CHARITABLE TRUST — $30,475 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetSRIPONYA COLLECTIVE — $30,250 over 2y, 4.1% of budgetUNITED WAY OF DESCHUTES COUNTY — $30,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetSISTERS RODEO ASSOCIATION — $25,500 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetREDEMPTION HOUSE MINISTRIES — $20,000 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetHEART OF OREGON CORPS INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCENTRAL OREGON HEALTH COUNCIL — $19,892 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetCITIZENS4COMMUNITY — $18,100 over 2y, 6.0% of budgetThe Shield — $18,000 over 2y, 16% of budgetMOSAIC COMMUNITY HEALTH — $18,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDAWNS HOUSE CORPORATION LLC — $17,500 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCASA OF CENTRAL OREGON — $17,500 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOREGON ADAPTIVE SPORTS — $17,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetSTROKE AWARENESS OREGON — $16,250 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetHigh Desert Food & Farm Alliance — $15,500 over 1y, 1.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds St Charles Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds OREGON ASSOCIATION OF HOSPITALS RESEARCH & EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE CLINIC OF THE CASCADES ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH VILLAGES INC ↗
  • Who funds COUNCIL ON AGING OF CENTRAL OREGON ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN CARE ↗
  • Who funds KIDS INTERVENTION AND DIAGNOSTIC SERVICE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Family Access Network Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JEFFERSON COUNTY FAITH BASED NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD'S HOUSE MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds MOUNTAINSTAR FAMILY RELIEF NURSERY ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM AT WARM SPRINGS ↗
  • Who funds CENTRAL OREGON VETERANS RANCH ↗
  • Who funds BENDNEXT ↗
  • Who funds TOUR DES CHUTES ↗
  • Who funds Lines for Life ↗
  • Who funds LATINO COMMUNITY ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds BESTCARE TREATMENT SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF BEND INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GIVING PLATE ↗
  • Who funds BETHLEHEM INN ↗
  • Who funds SEED TO TABLE OREGON ↗
  • Who funds JERICHO ROAD INC ↗
  • Who funds SAVING GRACE ↗
  • Who funds LA PINE SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
  • Who funds RIMROCK TRAILS TREATMENT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds NEIGHBORIMPACT ↗
  • Who funds LA PINE COMMUNITY KITCHEN ↗
  • Who funds J BAR J YOUTH SERVICES INC ↗
  • Who funds DESTINATION REHAB ↗
  • Who funds Better Together Central Oregon ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Roundhouse Founda…The Oregon Community …United Way of Deschut…Maybelle Clark Macdon…The Ford Family Found…The Autzen FoundationFirst Interstate Banc…The Anjulicia Foundat…Central Oregon Health…Marie Lamfrom Charita…Bend FoundationThe Collins Foundation
The Roundhouse FoundationOR82.2× affinity43 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Roundhouse Foundation · The Oregon Community Foundation · United Way of Deschutes County · Maybelle Clark Macdonald Fund · The Ford Family Foundation · The Autzen Foundation · First Interstate BancSystem Foundation Inc · The Anjulicia Foundation · Central Oregon Health Council · Marie Lamfrom Charitable Foundation Trust · Bend Foundation · The Collins Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization St Charles Health System Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 250%5%19%42%75%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 18%
  • J Bar J Youth Services Inc — 71% of income from government
  • Lines for Life — 70% of income from government
  • Neighborimpact — 68% of income from government
  • The Foundation for Medical Excellence — 66% of income from government
  • Mountainstar Family Relief Nursery — 60% of income from government
  • Samara Learning Center — 56% of income from government
  • Saving Grace — 48% of income from government
  • High Desert Food & Farm Alliance — 45% of income from government
  • Central Oregon Veterans Ranch — 45% of income from government
  • Council On Aging of Central Oregon — 43% of income from government
  • Horses On the Ranch — 33% of income from government
  • Heart of Oregon Corps Inc — 28% of income from government
  • Bestcare Treatment Services Inc — 27% of income from government
  • Dawns House Corporation Llc — 27% of income from government
  • Family Resource Center of Central Oregon — 22% of income from government
  • Commute Options — 21% of income from government
  • Rimrock Trails Treatment Services — 18% of income from government
  • Boys and Girls Clubs of Bend Inc — 16% of income from government
  • Friends of the Children- Central Oregon — 16% of income from government
  • Redemption House Ministries — 14% of income from government
  • Latino Community Association — 11% of income from government
  • Nami Oregon — 10% of income from government
  • Mosaic Community Health — 8% of income from government
  • Tower Theatre Foundation Inc — 8% of income from government
  • Volunteers in Medicine Clinic of the Cascades — 3% of income from government
  • Smart Reading — 3% of income from government
  • Casa of Central Oregon — 2% of income from government
  • Crook County Foundation — 2% of income from government
  • Economic Development for Central Oregon Inc — 2% of income from government
  • Bethlehem Inn — 0% of income from government
  • The Peaceful Presence Project — 0% of income from government
  • Oregon State University Foundation — 0% of income from government
  • Serenity Lane — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
25get no government money at all
12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
6rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to St Charles Health System Inc?

Find your warmest path to St Charles Health System Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 104 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines