Oregon · Nonprofit
ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY
ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY (Oregon) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,206 to it, the largest being TICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION ($5,456). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Three funders worth looking at
Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.
- United Way of Deschutes Countylocalportfolio match
- Bendnextlocal
- Jockey Being Family Foundation Ltdportfolio match
Who funds it, year by year
2017 → 2018: the base narrowed from 3 funders to 1 funder, grant income fell $6k → $3k.
From the IRS filings of ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
How concentrated its funding is
ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 66% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
66% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY.
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 51% · 2018 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Where its funders are
ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY draws 70% of its grant income from funders outside Oregon, across 3 states in all.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.
Funders to approach
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first.
- United Way of Deschutes Countylocalportfolio matchOR · funds 55 organizations near you · its grantees resemble your mission
- BendnextlocalOR · funds 87 organizations near you
- Jockey Being Family Foundation Ltdportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Barbara Emily Knudson Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Retailroi Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Realities for Children Charitiesportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Racing for Charity Incportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Steve and Kate Smith Community Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Braemar Charitable Trustportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Walters Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- Franz Bakery Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
- McKay Family Foundationportfolio matchits grantees resemble your mission
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Organizations like ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
In Oregon
Nationally
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
Footprint & structure
Files a return copy in 1 state
Screen this organization
A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.
Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf
Questions and answers
- Who funds ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY?
- ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY (Oregon) receives grants from 3 organizations whose IRS filings report $8,206 to it, the largest being TICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION ($5,456). 1 of them have funded it in more than one year.
- How many funders does ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY have?
- IRS filings report 3 organizations giving $8,206 in grants to ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY, 1 of which have funded it in more than one year.
- Who is the largest funder of ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY?
- TICKET TO DREAM FOUNDATION is the largest funder on record, with $5,456 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
- How can an organization like ACTION THROUGH ADVOCACY find more funders?
- Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Oregon. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.
These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2017 (financials across 2017–2017), and the filings of 3funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing