Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Private foundation

T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Private Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$5.4M
Granted FY2024still arriving
51
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$2.1M
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0167% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.

Philanthropy$12MEducation$11MHuman Services$1.0MYouth Development$427kCommunity Improvement$72kRecreation & Sports$57kPublic Benefit$56kReligion$41kArts & Culture$39kOther$12M
02FY2024 · 51 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k31 grants · $29k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $132k
  • $50k–250k10 grants · $1.2M
  • $250k+3 grants · $4.0M
$2,150
Median grant
6
States reached
$48M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLS$2,150,000
UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION$1,032,648
EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$850,000
ENVISION EDUCATION$165,500
URBAN MONTESSORI CHARTER SCHOOL$150,210
EDUCATION FOR CHANGE INC$150,000
LEAD LIBERATED$145,000
PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION$130,000
LED BETTER INC$125,000
ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC$125,000
Individual grant recipient$120,125
NATIONAL EQUITY PROJECT$75,000
MIRAMONTE BOOSTER CLUB$50,000
MARIN CATHOLIC HIGH SCHOOL$25,000
NIMBUS ARTS$25,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–24, $982k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $75k → 22%THE GILLISPIE SCHOOL: $250k → 11%MANTENA GLOBAL CARE: $100 → 16%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $75k → 22%THE GILLISPIE SCHOOL: $150k → 11%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $75k → 22%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $300 → 9%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $63k → 22%MONUMENT CRISIS CENTER: $206 → 9%THE GILLISPIE SCHOOL: $100k → 11%INTERNATIONAL SOCIAL SERVICES UNITED STATES OF AMERICA BRANCH: $260 → 19%SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE: $63k → 22%AL OTRO LADO: $250 → 14%SAN DIEGO YOUTH SERVICES: $100 → 11%JUVENILE DIABETES CURE ALLIANCE: $52 → 17%TIDES CENTER: $52 → 10%COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA: $46 → 10%JCC EAST BAY: $100 → 10%GRATEFUL GATHERINGS: $1k → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $309 → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $258 → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $200 → 10%BEYOND EMANCIPATION: $155 → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $40k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $3k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $50k → 10%GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY: $35k → 10%CATALYST YOUTH NETWORK: $500 → 10%CAMPS IN COMMON: $350 → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
CO
MO
VA
MD
DE
NM
DC
HI
AL
GA

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$21M · 103 repeat orgs$3.1M to everyone else

103 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 77 since wound down; 19 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

103
138

Total granted

$21M
$2.9M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+42%

Still filing today

78%
54%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 97% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $137k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementAnimalsArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EE
    ENVISION EDUCATION INC
    6× · 2019–2024 · $2.0M · revenue +24%
  • EF
    EDUCATION FOR CHANGE
    6× · 2019–2024 · $1.4M · revenue +61%
  • OL
    Oakland Literacy Coalition Inc
    7× · 2018–2024 · $906k · revenue ×15 · 60% of their budget

Funded once

  • RO
    REGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY
    one grant, 2021 · $1.5M
  • LC
    LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL
    one grant, 2019 · $993k
  • MC
    MILLS COLLEGE AT NORTHEASTERN UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2023 · $50k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The International School of San Francisco

Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…

Education
2
Jobs with Justice San Francisco

A long-term, strategic alliance of labor, community, faith-based, and student organizations working together to build greater economic power for workers and community members through employee rights at work and access to good jobs,…

Employment
3
Presidio Hill School

Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…

Education
4
Oakland Kids First

The mission of Oakland Kids First is to increase youth voice, leadership and power to create engaging and equitable public schools where all students learn and lead.

Youth Development
5
Public Advocates Inc

For more than five decades, public advocates has challenged the systemic causes of poverty and racial discrimination by strengthening community voices in public policy and achieving tangible legal victories advancing education, housing,…

—
6
Alternative Schools Inc

To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.

Education
7
Silicon Schools Fund Inc

The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…

Education
8
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
9
Unitedly

Unitedly is a nonprofit organization based in San Mateo County, California. Unitedly was established to ensure Asian families and communities have access to equitable opportunities and resources to thrive in the San Francisco Bay Area.

Human Services
10
The Language Academy of Sacramento

The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…

Education
11
The College Preparatory School

At college prep we believe in the foundational importance of scholarship, the value of dialogue, and the need for academically curious young people to belong to a kind, creative, diverse and joyful community. we challenge our students to…

Education
12
San Francisco Friends School

At san francisco friends school, students learn in a community grounded in the quaker values of reflection, integrity, peaceful problem-solving and stewardship. our teachers challenge students with a dynamic curriculum that inspires…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Oakland Public Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is William Loveland Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPolicy Advocacy Organizatio…Community Support ServicesFamily Philanthropic Founda…School Parent-Teacher Organ…Asian Cultural Heritage Org…Fraternal Membership Organi…Affordable Housing Developm…Environmental Policy Advoca…Community Arts & Performanc…International Child Educati…Healthcare Delivery & Suppo…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%3%<5yr15%9%5–10yr20%29%10–20yr18%32%20–35yr12%13%35–55yr12%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%8%5–10yr20%18%10–20yr18%21%20–35yr12%5%35–55yr12%49%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.5% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.5%1/192
the rest of the field
14%
17,672/130,752

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

181 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 181 of the 272 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
41
Early backer (in before they grew)
176/181
Grantees still filing
122/181
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLS — $6,760,842 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLSREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA AT BERKELEY — $1,500,000 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORN…UC BERKELEY FOUNDATION — $1,079,093 · OtherUC BERKELEY FOUNDATIONLIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL — $993,094 · OtherLIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient — $470,625 · Other+112 more — $1,253,326 · Other+112 moreEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,332,498 · PhilanthropyEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION — $886,617 · PhilanthropyPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION+9 more — $317,706 · PhilanthropyENVISION EDUCATION INC — $2,045,091 · EducationENVISION EDUCATION INCEDUCATION FOR CHANGE — $1,378,100 · EducationEDUCATION FOR CHANGEGO Public Schools — $1,317,500 · EducationGO Public SchoolsLead Liberated — $1,120,135 · EducationLead LiberatedOakland Literacy Coalition Inc — $905,699 · EducationOakland Literacy Coalition IncURBAN MONTESSORI — $832,832 · EducationURBAN MONTESSORITHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND — $691,777 · EducationTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUNDThe Oakland REACH — $594,753 · EducationThe Oakland REACHLED BETTER INC — $397,000 · EducationNATIONAL EQUITY PROJECT — $365,100 · Education+28 more — $1,176,147 · Education+28 moreTHE GILLISPIE SCHOOL — $500,000 · Human ServicesSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE — $350,000 · Human ServicesGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY — $125,000 · Human Services+9 more — $31,288 · Human ServicesFamily Engagement Lab — $235,000 · Youth DevelopmentONEGOAL — $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentMOVING FORWARD INSTITUTE — $50,000 · Youth Development+5 more — $22,293 · Youth DevelopmentINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $25,050 · Community ImprovementCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCE — $25,000 · Community ImprovementFaith In Action East Bay — $20,000 · Community Improvement+3 more — $1,484 · Community ImprovementGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · Recreation & SportsMATS SOCCER CLUB INC — $15,000 · Recreation & SportsOakland Childrens Fairyland Inc — $9,500 · Recreation & SportsWomens Sports Foundation — $5,000 · Recreation & Sports+4 more — $2,244 · Recreation & Sports
Other$12,056,980Philanthropy$11,536,821Education$10,824,134Human Services$1,006,288Youth Development$427,293Community Improvement$71,534Recreation & Sports$56,744

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetEAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $10,332,498 over 5y, 2.9% of budgetENVISION EDUCATION INC — $2,045,091 over 6y, 3.2% of budgetEDUCATION FOR CHANGE — $1,378,100 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetGO Public Schools — $1,317,500 over 4y, 18% of budgetLead Liberated — $1,120,135 over 7y, 23% of budgetOakland Literacy Coalition Inc — $905,699 over 7y, 60% of budgetPHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION — $886,617 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetURBAN MONTESSORI — $832,832 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetTHE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND — $691,777 over 7y, 0.7% of budgetThe Oakland REACH — $594,753 over 5y, 13% of budgetTHE GILLISPIE SCHOOL — $500,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetLED BETTER INC — $397,000 over 6y, 16% of budgetNATIONAL EQUITY PROJECT — $365,100 over 7y, 1.0% of budgetSPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE — $350,000 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC — $281,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS — $260,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFamily Engagement Lab — $235,000 over 5y, 3.7% of budgetARISE HIGH SCHOOL — $175,300 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetGIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY — $125,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetONEGOAL — $120,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDONORSCHOOSEORG — $116,754 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetREADING PARTNERS — $105,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMILLS COLLEGE — $101,150 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $101,050 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA COUNCIL BSA — $100,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY SCHOOL FOR CREATIVE EDUCATION — $96,300 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetEAST BAY INNOVATION ACADEMY — $55,469 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetEast Oakland Youth Development Center — $54,850 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetSUPER STARS LITERACY INC — $50,100 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetMiramonte High School Boosters Club — $50,000 over 1y, 24% of budgetUNITED STATES ROWING ASSOCIATION — $41,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetThe Teaching Well Inc — $40,020 over 2y, 7.8% of budgetCHILDREN RISING INC — $40,000 over 2y, 3.0% of budgetENTITLED FUTURES — $31,500 over 1y, 18% of budgetSURGE INSTITUTE — $25,050 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetINQUIRING SYSTEMS INC — $25,050 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetNIMBUS ARTS — $25,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FINANCE — $25,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetGOLDEN STATE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH OAKLAND COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL — $24,052 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetAURUM PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC — $24,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetPRESIDENT-BOARD OF TRUSTEES SANTA CLARA COLLEGE — $23,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEAST OAKLAND BOXING ASSOCIATION — $20,250 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetOAKLAND PROMISE — $20,126 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEDVENTUREMORE — $20,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetFaith In Action East Bay — $20,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY INITIATIVES — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetYU MING CHARTER SCHOOL — $19,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ENVISION EDUCATION INC ↗
  • Who funds EDUCATION FOR CHANGE ↗
  • Who funds GO Public Schools ↗
  • Who funds Lead Liberated ↗
  • Who funds Oakland Literacy Coalition Inc ↗
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPIC VENTURES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds URBAN MONTESSORI ↗
  • Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
  • Who funds The Oakland REACH ↗
  • Who funds THE GILLISPIE SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds LED BETTER INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL EQUITY PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SPRINGBOARD COLLABORATIVE ↗
  • Who funds ROCKEFELLER PHILANTHROPY ADVISORS INC ↗
  • Who funds ASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
  • Who funds Family Engagement Lab ↗
  • Who funds ARISE HIGH SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds GIRLS INCORPORATED OF ALAMEDA COUNTY ↗
  • Who funds ONEGOAL ↗
  • Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
  • Who funds READING PARTNERS ↗
  • Who funds MILLS COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA COUNCIL BSA ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY SCHOOL FOR CREATIVE EDUCATION ↗
  • Who funds EAST BAY INNOVATION ACADEMY ↗
  • Who funds East Oakland Youth Development Center ↗
  • Who funds SUPER STARS LITERACY INC ↗
  • Who funds MOVING FORWARD INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Miramonte High School Boosters Club ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES ROWING ASSOCIATION ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

East Bay Community Fo…The San Francisco Fou…T Gary and Kathleen R…Quest FoundationThe Oakland Public Ed…The Barrios TrustKenneth Rainin Founda…Marin Community Found…Silicon Schools Fund …Golden State Communit…The James Irvine Foun…Silicon Valley Commun…
East Bay Community FoundationCA77.7× affinity54 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: East Bay Community Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Supporting Family Foundation · Quest Foundation · The Oakland Public Education Fund · The Barrios Trust · Kenneth Rainin Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Schools Fund Inc · Golden State Community Foundation · The James Irvine Foundation · Silicon Valley Community Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Private Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 72%
  • International Social Service United States of America Branch Inc — 72% of income from government
  • Teensharp — 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
56report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 272 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines