· Public charity
T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Supporting Family Foundation
None.
Read this first · the figures below need context
64% of T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Supporting Family Foundation’s FY2019 grant dollars went to East Bay Community Foundation, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2019 names 10 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2018, the last year T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Supporting Family Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 35 organizations, $3M. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2019.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 44 grants below total $3,413,724 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $3,513,119 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $99,395 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2018
- Under $10k2 grants · $16k
- $10k–50k28 grants · $517k
- $50k–250k10 grants · $1.1M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.8M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY CHARTER SCHOOL | $710,280 |
| EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $392,000 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION | $355,125 |
| UNITED STATES ROWING ASSOCIATION | $349,500 |
| OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND | $236,845 |
| THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH | $150,000 |
| URBAN MONTESSORI CHARTER SCHOOL | $130,725 |
| UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION | $110,000 |
| STANFORD UNIVERSITY HOOVER INSTITUTION | $105,000 |
| GO PUBLIC SCHOOLS | $90,000 |
| CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES | $71,465 |
| ENVISION EDUCATION INC | $69,850 |
| OAKLAND UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT | $60,000 |
| THRIVAL WORLD ACADEMIES FS SOCIAL GOOD FUND | $50,000 |
| AGENCY BY DESIGN FS OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND | $45,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–17, $50k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 10% of T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Supporting Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 93% of the giving stays in CA; read by stated purpose it is 88% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
19 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2018, 0 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2018 (too recent to call). Read against FY2018, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2019, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $83k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LCLIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS2× · 2018–2019 · $1.4M · revenue +158%
- UOUNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION2× · 2017–2018 · $380k · revenue +189%
- NENATIONAL EQUITY PROJECT2× · 2017–2018 · $348k · revenue +56%
Funded once
- UOUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $240k · revenue +46%
- CSCALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATIONone grant, 2017 · $128k · revenue +18%
- EFElectronic Frontier Foundation Incone grant, 2017 · $105k · revenue +24%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of the silicon schools fund is to improve education through supporting the launch of excellent new schools, improving academic instruction in existing schools, and by funding some of the boldest innovations in education…
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
Build the parent and community demand for world-class public schools, and to accelerate the growth of these schools, particularly for low-income students, students of colors, and students with special needs.
To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.
To ensure students reach their fullest potential through access to learning spaces that honor and celebrate students' rich cultural heritage and challenge them with rigorous and relevant learning experiences designed to make them active…
Our mission is to create inclusive, empowering, and college-preparatory experiences that equip students to succeed in college, career, and as leaders in their communities.
At college prep we believe in the foundational importance of scholarship, the value of dialogue, and the need for academically curious young people to belong to a kind, creative, diverse and joyful community. we challenge our students to…
A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.
Presidio hill school is a co-ed k-8 independent, progressive school. learning is collaborative and an active experience with an emphasis on inquiry. students are engaged in their own learning and guided by an expert faculty through a…
The las mission is to create a learning community where students: utilize bilingualism and biliteracy (spanish and english) to achieve academic excellence and apply skills in real-world situations and diverse settings; develop and exhibit…
Together with families and communities, we create joyful, academically excellent schools that prepare students with the skills and confidence to pursue the paths they choose college, career, and beyond so they can lead fulfilling lives and…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Oakland Public Education Fund and the most unlike its peers is African Wildlife Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 21% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
57 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 57 of the 63 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EAST BAY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LIGHTHOUSE COMMUNITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds THE OAKLAND PUBLIC EDUCATION FUND ↗
- Who funds GO Public Schools ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA BERKELEY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNITED STATES ROWING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL EQUITY PROJECT ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds THE BOARD OF TRUSTEES OF THE LELAND STANFORD JUNIOR UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds URBAN MONTESSORI ↗
- Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY BAKERSFIELD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA SAN FRANCISCO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Electronic Frontier Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds ENVISION EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA ACADEMY OF SCIENCES ↗
- Who funds OAKLAND SCHOOL FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds CORE DISTRICTS ↗
- Who funds KQED INC ↗
- Who funds SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC ↗
- Who funds Lead Liberated ↗
- Who funds DONORSCHOOSEORG ↗
- Who funds EDUCATION FOR CHANGE ↗
- Who funds Next Step Learning Center Inc ↗
- Who funds TRINITY SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds ASPIRE PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds ORINDA NETWORK FOR EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds PIVOT LEARNING ↗
- Who funds AURUM PREPARATORY ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Friends of California Mens Crew ↗
- Who funds SAN FRANCISCO BAY AREA COUNCIL BSA ↗
- Who funds LED BETTER INC ↗
- Who funds EAST OAKLAND BOXING ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds AFRICAN WILDLIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds AIM HIGH FOR HIGH SCHOOL ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Private Family Foundation · East Bay Community Foundation · The Oakland Public Education Fund · Quest Foundation · Kenneth Rainin Foundation · The San Francisco Foundation · Marin Community Foundation · Silicon Schools Fund Inc · Lead Liberated · Golden State Community Foundation · Elbridge Stuart Foundation Dba Stuart Foundation · Walton Family Foundation Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Supporting Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Education Resource Strategies Inc — 4% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Supporting Family Foundation?
Find your warmest path to T Gary and Kathleen Rogers Supporting Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.