· Community foundation
Placer Community Foundation
The Placer Community Foundation grows local giving to strengthen our community.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 57 grants below total $1,290,320 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $1,477,928 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $187,608 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k13 grants · $86k
- $10k–50k40 grants · $761k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $443k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Auburn Community Foundation | $180,656 |
| Gold Country Wildlife Rescue | $154,091 |
| Cal Poly Foundation | $55,000 |
| Auburn Symphony | $53,590 |
| Placer Artist Tour | $47,800 |
| Cntr for Nonprofit Leadership | $44,526 |
| Latino Leadership Council | $38,000 |
| Lighthouse Counceling FRC | $33,000 |
| Placer SPCA | $32,100 |
| Blue Line Arts | $30,680 |
| Sierra Native Alliance | $30,500 |
| Placer Land Trust | $30,500 |
| Auburn State Theatre | $28,130 |
| Boys & Girls Club of Placer | $26,950 |
| Stand Up Placer | $25,100 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +78% since the first grant, against +23% for the ones you funded once.
79 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2024, 38 since wound down; 16 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 74% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $334k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FTFEEDING THE FOOTHILLS8× · 2017–2024 · $510k · revenue +73%
- AAAUBURN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE3× · 2020–2022 · $463k · revenue +107% · 65% of their budget
- LCLighthouse Counseling and Family Resource Center8× · 2017–2024 · $432k · revenue +108%
Funded once
- ATAUBURN TRAPSHOOTING CLUBone grant, 2018 · $500k · revenue +9%
- SHShriners Hospital for Childreone grant, 2018 · $198k
- TSTHE SALVATION ARMYone grant, 2020 · $130k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To lead, collaborate, coordinate, develop, and implement strategies and resources to end homelessness in Nevada and Placer counties.
Advocates for abused, neglected and other identified children within the court system, with the belief that every child is entitled to a safe and stable home.
Foothill Dog Rescue is a 100% all volunteer organization dedicated to re-homing dogs from over crowded animal shelters, owner surrenders and underserved communities. We also sponsor vaccine and microchip clinics for our County and have…
C.A.R.E.S.MISSION STATEMENT*Rescue, foster and find good homes for abandoned and homeless domestic and farm animals.*Spay/neuter abandoned and homeless cats and dogs, as well as help low income families with same.*Conduct TNR+ programs to…
MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…
To provide financing and services that will increase the opportunities available for lower income households to obtain decent, safe, and sanitary affordable housing in Placer County, California, by including various sectors of the economy…
Care for shelter animals, provide public with free spay/neuter services, educational outreach.
High Sierra Animal Rescues mission is to save the lives of homeless dogs in the regions served. Our staff and volunteers are dedicated to making our communities better through successful adoptions advancing their welfare and creating human…
The Placer Community Foundation grows local giving to strengthen our community.
California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…
To deliver comprehensive health and human service programs that improve the health and well-being of under-served california residents.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Casa of Placer Yuba and Sutter and the most unlike its peers is William Jessup University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
159 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 159 of the 192 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds THE US CHARITABLE GIFT TRUST ↗
- Who funds FEEDING THE FOOTHILLS ↗
- Who funds AUBURN TRAPSHOOTING CLUB ↗
- Who funds AUBURN AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds Lighthouse Counseling and Family Resource Center ↗
- Who funds Auburn State Theatre Incorporated ↗
- Who funds Gold Country Wildlife Rescue Inc ↗
- Who funds The Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals SPCA ↗
- Who funds Sierra College Foundation ↗
- Who funds Advocates for the Mentally Ill Housing Inc ↗
- Who funds Boys and Girls Club of Placer County ↗
- Who funds STAND UP PLACER INC ↗
- Who funds PLACER LAND TRUST ↗
- Who funds SENIORS FIRST INC ↗
- Who funds AUBURN INTERFAITH FOOD CLOSET INC ↗
- Who funds Latino Leadership Council Inc ↗
- Who funds AUBURN CIVIC SYMPHONY ↗
- Who funds Auburn Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR NONPROFIT LEADERSHIP OF THE SIERRA ↗
- Who funds PLACER PEOPLE OF FAITH TOGETHER ↗
- Who funds NATIVE ALLIANCE OF THE SIERRA NEVADA FOOTHILLS ↗
- Who funds BLUE LINE ARTS ↗
- Who funds CASA of Placer Yuba and Sutter ↗
- Who funds KidsFirst Child Abuse Prevention Council of Placer County ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds GRANITE WELLNESS CENTERS ↗
- Who funds Horses' Honor ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PLACER FAMILY HOUSING NON-PROFIT ORGANIZATION ↗
- Who funds ST VINCENT DE PAUL SOCIETY ROSEVILLE AREA CONFERENCE INC ↗
- Who funds Project Go Inc ↗
- Who funds HEALTH EDUCATION COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds SIERRA FOOTHILLS AIDS FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds HEARTSTRINGS COUNSELING INC ↗
- Who funds Kitten Central of Placer County Inc ↗
- Who funds ASSISTANCE LEAGUE OF GREATER PLACER ↗
- Who funds Sierra Nevada Memorial Hospital Foundation ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Sacramento Region Community Foundation · Teichert Foundation · Sutter Valley Hospitals · Armrod Charitable Foundation · Kelly Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Sierra Health Foundation · Dieter Family Foundation · Ticket to Dream Foundation · John Mohme Foundation · Lee and Carol Tager Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Placer Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.