· Private foundation
Stonehocker Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BRENT'S PLACE BRENT ELEY FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION | $2,500 |
| NORTHGLENN HISTORIC PRESERVATION FOUNDATION | $2,500 |
| PROJECT ANGEL HEART | $2,500 |
| THE NATURE CONSERVANCY | $2,500 |
| HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO | $2,500 |
| RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE | $2,500 |
| THERE WITH CARE | $2,000 |
| A LITTLE HELP | $2,000 |
| ROCKY MOUNTAIN MS CENTER | $2,000 |
| WELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS | $2,000 |
| FRIENDS OF BROOMFIELD | $2,000 |
| ALMOST HOME | $1,500 |
| GRAND SENIORS AT MOUNTAIN FAMILY CENTER | $1,250 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $61k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 77% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Where the work is directed
The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.
About 12% of Stonehocker Family Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another. Read by recipient address, 84% of the giving stays in CO; read by stated purpose it is 80% — less of the work is directed home than the recipients' locations suggest.
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
27 repeat relationships — 15 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- AFALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION9× · 2017–2025 · $34k · revenue +194%
- TWTHERE WITH CARE7× · 2019–2025 · $17k · revenue +18%
- AHAlmost Home Inc9× · 2017–2025 · $17k · revenue +338%
Funded once
- FTFAMILY TREE INCgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $3k · revenue +43%
- MFMOUNTAIN FAMILY CENTER GRAND SENIORone grant, 2023 · $3k
- RMROCKY MOUNTAIN HONOR FLIGHTgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $2k · revenue +188%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seeking to put god's love into action; habitat for humanity brings people together to build homes, communities, and hope to realize our vision of a world where everyone has a decent place to live. fort collins habitat for humanity adheres…
United Food Bank unites communities to alleviate hunger.
The mission of the colorado coalition for the homeless is to work collaboratively toward the prevention of homelessness and the creation of lasting solutions for families, children, and individuals who are experiencing or at-risk of…
To provide meaningful access to high quality, civil legal services in the pursuit of justice for as many low income persons and members of vulnerable populations throughout colorado as possible.
To provide an immediate and compassionate response to those in our community experiencing hardship by offering resources and services to stabilize lives and promote pathways to lasting change.
Providing innovative and life-enriching services for children, adolescents, and adults with disabilities.
Sunshine home share colorado ensures quality of life for older adults and strengthens communities through a safe home-sharing model, supportive economic empowerment, and connections to resources and services.
Partnering to improve quality of life as a nonprofit organization dedicated to mental health and wellness. healing is our purpose, help is our promise, health is our passion.
Impact development fund helps people within our underserved communities seek fulfillment for themselves and their families by providing access to affordable living. we create these opportunities by delivering flexible capital to nonprofit…
To advance change by feeding the hungry and educating and engaging the community in the fight to end hunger.
Faith Family Hospitality's mission is to support families experiencing homelessness to achieve sustainable self-sufficiency in a timely and dignified manner. This interfaith volunteer effort coordinates the work of 30 diverse Fort Collins…
Authoracare collective empowers people to be active participants in their care journey, enabling them to live on their own terms through personalized support for mind, body, and spirit.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is A Precious Child Inc and the most unlike its peers is Rocky Mountain Honor Flight. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 4% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR CHOICE IN EDUCATION ↗
- Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds THERE WITH CARE ↗
- Who funds Almost Home Inc ↗
- Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
- Who funds HOPE HOUSE OF COLORADO ↗
- Who funds Joshuas Storehouse and Distribution Center ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF BROOMFIELD INC ↗
- Who funds ASHLEY DOOLITTLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS CENTER ↗
- Who funds A LITTLE HELP ↗
- Who funds ANCHOR HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PROJECT ANGEL HEART ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY SERVICES OF BROOMFIELD ↗
- Who funds THE URBAN FARM ↗
- Who funds WELD COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds A PRECIOUS CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILY TREE INC ↗
- Who funds FOOD BANK OF THE ROCKIES ↗
- Who funds ROCKY MOUNTAIN HONOR FLIGHT ↗
- Who funds GRAND COUNTY COUNCIL ON AGING INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Colorado Gives Foundation · Xcel Energy Foundation · The Denver Foundation · The Colorado Health Foundation · Mile High United Way Inc · Anschutz Family Foundation · Daniels Fund · Rose Community Foundation · El Pomar Foundation · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Stonehocker Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Wounded Warrior Project Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.