Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$912k
Granted FY2023
85
Grants FY2023
3
States reached
$37k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Human Services$1.4MHealth$1.0MEducation$471kReligion$459kFood & Nutrition$378kArts & Culture$338kHousing & Shelter$310kPublic Safety & Disaster$309kOther$0
02FY2023 · 85 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

The 85 grants below total $806,822 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $912,004 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $105,182 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.

By grant size · FY2023

  • Under $10k52 grants · $320k
  • $10k–50k33 grants · $487k
$8,280
Median grant
3
States reached
$22M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DePaul School for Hearing and Speech$36,985
Allegheny Health Network$30,000
Dr. Jay Passavant Family Foundation$25,000
Passavant Memorial Homes Foundation$22,375
The Children's Institute of Pittsburgh$20,000
Foster Love Project$20,000
Friends of the Pittsburgh Fisher House, Inc.$20,000
412 Food Rescue, Inc.$15,500
Familylinks Inc.$15,000
Mary & Alexander Laughlin Children's Center$15,000
Bible Center Church, Inc.$15,000
The Woodlands Foundation, Inc.$15,000
Hosanna House, Inc.$15,000
Greater Pittsburgh Community Food Bank$15,000
Variety the Children's Charity$14,400
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–20, $718k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 97% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%OPERATION WARM: $8k → 6%OPERATION WARM: $8k → 10%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $19k → 11%STOP ABUSE FOR EVERYONE (SAFE): $7k → 14%GLADE RUN FOUNDATION: $19k → 9%CHRISTIAN LAYMAN CORPS: $15k → 10%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $12k → 11%GLADE RUN FOUNDATION: $15k → 9%CHRISTIAN LAYMAN CORPS: $15k → 10%COMPUTER REACH: $10k → 11%URSULINE SUPPORT SERVICES: $15k → 11%CHRISTIAN LAYMAN CORPS: $10k → 10%FAMILY GUIDANCE INC: $8k → 11%JEWISH ASSOCIATION ON AGING: $15k → 11%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $10k → 12%LIGHT OF LIFE RESCUE MISSION: $7k → 11%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $10k → 12%JEWISH FAMILY & CHILDREN'S SERVICE: $11k → 11%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $10k → 12%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $10k → 12%WASHINGTON CITY MISSION: $10k → 12%TRANSITIONAL PATHS TO INDEPENDENT LIVING: $8k → 12%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $25k → 11%EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY: $25k → 11%JEREMIAHS PLACE: $10k → 11%FAMILYLINKS INC: $10k → 11%FAMILY LINKS INC: $9k → 11%RIVERVIEW CHILDREN'S CENTER: $9k → 11%THE WATSON INSTITUTE: $40k → 11%THE WATSON INSTITUTE: $30k → 11%THE WATSON INSTITUTE: $30k → 11%THE WATSON INST: $30k → 11%WARD HOME INC: $9k → 11%EVOLVE COACHING INC: $11k → 11%THE EMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH INC: $10k → 11%URBAN IMPACT FOUNDATION: $6k → 11%THE WOODLANDS FOUNDATION: $15k → 11%PENSYLVANIA WOMEN WORK: $12k → 11%REFORMED PRESBYTERIAN WOMANS ASSOC: $10k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $16k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION: $8k → 11%THE BRADLEY CENTER: $13k → 11%THE BRADLEY CENTER: $10k → 11%THE BRADLEY CENTER: $7k → 11%CORAOPOLIS COMMUNITY DEV CORP: $8k → 11%JUBILEE ASSOC INC: $10k → 11%BETHEHEM HAVEN OF PITTSBURGH INC: $10k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.5M · 109 repeat orgs$1.8M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +22% for the ones you funded once.

109 repeat relationships — 29 still active in FY2023, 80 since wound down; 56 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

109
145

Total granted

$3.5M
$1.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+37%
+22%

Still filing today

70%
46%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 39% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $492k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’23
Human ServicesHealthEducationPhilanthropyArts & CultureAnimalsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CI
    CARNEGIE INSTITUTE
    3× · 2017–2019 · $200k · revenue +57%
  • TW
    THE WATSON INSTITUTE
    4× · 2017–2020 · $130k · revenue +272%
  • DS
    DEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH
    5× · 2017–2023 · $92k · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • SS
    ST SEBASTIAN CATH CHUCH
    one grant, 2019 · $50k
  • SU
    SMITHFIELD UNITED CHURCH OF CHRIST
    one grant, 2019 · $40k
  • SA
    SALVATION ARMY OF WESTERN PA
    one grant, 2020 · $30k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Mercy Life Center Corporation

We, pittsburgh mercy health system and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. mercy life center is a member of pittsburgh mercy health system…

Health
2
Pittsburgh Mercy Health System Inc

We, pittsburgh mercy health system (pittsburgh mercy) and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. pittsburgh mercy is a member of trinity…

Health
3
Pittsburgh Community Services Inc

Provide programs to help individuals and/or families achieve self-sufficiency.

Human Services
4
Wrc Pennsylvania Memorial Home

Wrc pennsylvania memorial home's mission is to provide choices for generations. built on a not-for-profit foundation of caring, the organization offers residential and personal care, home and community-based services, skilled and…

Health
5
Prevention Point Pittsburgh

To provide health empowerment services to injection drug users and prevent the spread of hiv.

Health
6
The Midwife Center for Birth and Women's Health

The midwife center is southwestern pennsylvania's only licensed and accredited freestanding birth center offering full scope nurse-midwifery care to women and their families. services include prenatal labor and delivery, postpartum,…

Health
7
Pittsburgh Cares

The organization's purpose is to create flexible, rewarding, and meaningful volunteer opportunities in the pittsburgh region. pittsburgh cares partners with community based organizations to create the volunteer opportunities and recruits…

Community Improvement
8
Community Human Services Corporation

Chs empowers individuals and families to live in stable housing, connect to community resources, build relationships and access quality food.

Human Services
9
The Arc of Greater Pittsburgh

The organization advocates with, empowers, and supports people with disabilities and their families throughout their lives.

Human Services
10
Penn Highlands Healthcare Inc

Our community-based and controlled health care system exists to improve regional access to a wide array of premier primary care and advanced health services while supporting a reverence for life and the worth and dignity of each individual.

Health
11
Pittsylvania County Community Action Inc

To increase awareness about poverty and to promote comprehensive approaches to eliminate conditions that cause poverty and improve the quality of life in communities throughout the service area.

—
12
Philadelphia Works Inc

Philadelphia works, inc. develops and manages smart workforce solutions that respond to business needs and increases economic opportunity for all philadelphia residents.

Employment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Victims and the most unlike its peers is Little Sisters of the Poor. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyPittsburgh Regional Coaliti…Christian Ministry Organiza…Family Philanthropic Founda…Private Charitable Foundati…Healthcare & Human Services…Youth Services & SupportVolunteer Fire DepartmentsCommunity Support ServicesSenior Affordable HousingRegional Healthcare SystemsPerforming Arts Organizatio…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 20. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number17%2%<5yr13%3%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr20%26%20–35yr16%26%35–55yr17%24%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value17%1%<5yr13%2%5–10yr19%15%10–20yr20%25%20–35yr16%25%35–55yr17%32%55yr+

The field is 17% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/188
the rest of the field
8%
898/11,961

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

179 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 179 of the 312 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
41
Early backer (in before they grew)
173/179
Grantees still filing
119/179
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SAINT SEBASTIAN CATHOLIC CHURCH — $100,000 · Other+124 more — $2,402,694 · Other+124 moreTHE WATSON INSTITUTE — $130,000 · Human ServicesTHE WATSON INSTITUTEEAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY — $75,000 · Human ServicesEAST END COOPERATIVE …FAMILYLINKS INC — $61,500 · Human ServicesFAMILYLINKS INCWASHINGTON CITY MISSION — $55,000 · Human ServicesWASHINGTON CITY MISSI…THE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS — $49,000 · Human ServicesTHE BRADLEY CENTER INC — $48,898 · Human ServicesLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $47,827 · Human ServicesBAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION — $41,561 · Human ServicesOperation Warm Inc — $36,500 · Human ServicesFAMILY GUIDANCE INC — $35,272 · Human ServicesGLADE RUN FOUNDATION — $34,394 · Human ServicesEMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH INC — $32,500 · Human Services+20 more — $297,673 · Human Services+20 moreCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $75,176 · HealthCHILDREN'…THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH — $41,044 · HealthTHE CHILD…MARIAN MANOR CORPORATION — $40,000 · HealthMARIAN MA…FAMILY HOUSE INC — $39,500 · HealthFAMILY HO…American Heart Association Inc — $30,000 · HealthAmerican …Lending Hearts — $25,000 · HealthLending H…Spina Bifida Assoc of Western PA — $22,500 · HealthSpina Bif…CROHN'S & COLITIS FOUNDATION INC — $22,500 · HealthCROHN'S &…ST ANNE HOME — $18,181 · HealthFACE2FACE HEALING INC — $17,500 · HealthBRENTWOOD EMERGENCY MEDICAL SERVICES — $15,000 · HealthMARY & ALEXANDER LAUGHLIN CHILDREN'S CENTER — $15,000 · Health+6 more — $60,280 · Health+6 moreCARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $200,000 · Arts & CultureCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH — $61,720 · Arts & CultureTHE MATTRESS FACTORY LTD — $27,000 · Arts & CultureDEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH — $91,985 · EducationTHE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH — $50,000 · EducationREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH — $28,000 · EducationLITERACY PITTSBURGH — $27,500 · EducationPROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationKENTUCKY AVENUE SCHOOL — $24,228 · EducationTHE NEIGHBORHOOD ACADEMY — $12,000 · EducationWESTERN PENNSYLVANIA SCHOOL FOR THE DEAF — $10,000 · Education+2 more — $17,531 · EducationGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $67,500 · Food & Nutrition412 FOOD RESCUE INC — $50,500 · Food & NutritionSOMERSET COUNTY MOBILE FOOD BANK — $50,000 · Food & NutritionWESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $45,609 · Food & NutritionGROW PITTSBURGH — $25,400 · Food & NutritionFoster Love Project — $55,000 · PhilanthropyTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $50,000 · PhilanthropyBest of the Batch Foundation — $30,000 · PhilanthropyPITTSBURGH PENGUINS FOUNDATION — $25,000 · PhilanthropyTHE DR JAY PASSAVANT FAMILY FOUNDAT — $25,000 · PhilanthropyPASSAVANT MEMORIAL HOMES FOUNDATION — $22,375 · PhilanthropyFRIENDS OF THE PITTSBURGH FISHER HOUSE INC — $20,000 · Philanthropy
Other$2,502,694Human Services$945,125Health$421,681Arts & Culture$288,720Education$286,244Food & Nutrition$239,009Philanthropy$227,375

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetCARNEGIE INSTITUTE — $200,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE WATSON INSTITUTE — $130,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetDEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH — $91,985 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetTRI-CITY LIFE CENTER INC — $78,445 over 4y, 5.1% of budgetCHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $75,176 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetEAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY — $75,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetGREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK — $67,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH — $61,720 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFAMILYLINKS INC — $61,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFoster Love Project — $55,000 over 4y, 2.5% of budgetWASHINGTON CITY MISSION — $55,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES — $52,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budget412 FOOD RESCUE INC — $50,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetVariety the Childrens Charity — $50,400 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetSOMERSET COUNTY MOBILE FOOD BANK — $50,000 over 4y, 9.2% of budgetTHE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION — $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH — $50,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS — $49,000 over 4y, 4.3% of budgetTHE BRADLEY CENTER INC — $48,898 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetLIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC — $47,827 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC — $45,609 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetOPERATION TROOP APPRECIATION — $45,000 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetVERLAND — $43,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH HILLS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC — $42,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetBAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION — $41,561 over 4y, 1.0% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH — $41,044 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY AT HOLY FAMILY MANOR — $40,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetMARIAN MANOR CORPORATION — $40,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetFAMILY HOUSE INC — $39,500 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOperation Warm Inc — $36,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY GUIDANCE INC — $35,272 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetGLADE RUN FOUNDATION — $34,394 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetEMMAUS COMMUNITY OF PITTSBURGH INC — $32,500 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetLITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR — $30,440 over 2y, 58% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc — $30,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWOODLANDS FOUNDATION INC — $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetBest of the Batch Foundation — $30,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetNATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN PITTSBURGH SECTION — $30,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetJEREMIAH'S PLACE PITTSBURGH RELIEF NURSERY — $28,600 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetASBURY FOUNDATION — $28,212 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetREADING IS FUNDAMENTAL PITTSBURGH — $28,000 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetLITERACY PITTSBURGH — $27,500 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetTHE MATTRESS FACTORY LTD — $27,000 over 2y, 1.0% of budgetGROW PITTSBURGH — $25,400 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetNATIONAL AVIARY IN PITTSBURGH INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPITTSBURGH PENGUINS FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPROPEL SCHOOLS FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetLending Hearts — $25,000 over 3y, 5.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds CARNEGIE INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds THE WATSON INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds DEPAUL SCHOOL FOR HEARING AND SPEECH ↗
  • Who funds TRI-CITY LIFE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds EAST END COOPERATIVE MINISTRY ↗
  • Who funds GREATER PITTSBURGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds FAMILYLINKS INC ↗
  • Who funds Foster Love Project ↗
  • Who funds WASHINGTON CITY MISSION ↗
  • Who funds SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MINISTRIES ↗
  • Who funds 412 FOOD RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Variety the Childrens Charity ↗
  • Who funds SOMERSET COUNTY MOBILE FOOD BANK ↗
  • Who funds THE PITTSBURGH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds THE CHRISTIAN LAYMANS CORPS ↗
  • Who funds THE BRADLEY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds LIGHT OF LIFE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION TROOP APPRECIATION ↗
  • Who funds VERLAND ↗
  • Who funds NORTH HILLS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC ↗
  • Who funds BAPTIST HOMES FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOME OF PITTSBURGH ↗
  • Who funds THE COMMUNITY AT HOLY FAMILY MANOR ↗
  • Who funds MARIAN MANOR CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Operation Warm Inc ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY GUIDANCE INC ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The United Way of Sou…The Pittsburgh Founda…Hillman Family Founda…The Jack Buncher Foun…Richard King Mellon F…The Grable FoundationEqt FoundationMassey Charitable Tru…Staunton Farm Foundat…Howard & Nell E Mille…Centimark FoundationUpmc Group
The United Way of Southwestern PennsylvaniaPA140.3× affinity76 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The United Way of Southwestern Pennsylvania · The Pittsburgh Foundation · Hillman Family Foundations · The Jack Buncher Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · The Grable Foundation · Eqt Foundation · Massey Charitable Trust · Staunton Farm Foundation 540-054 Dba Staunton Farm Foundation · Howard & Nell E Miller Foundat · Centimark Foundation · Upmc Group

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    50report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 312 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports $1.0M of grant expense with no grantee named in the published copy. A private foundation itemizes every grant it makes, so a return carrying none has filed its list as an attachment that the public copy does not include. The figures above are therefore from FY2023, the most recent year this funder’s grantee list reached the public record.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home