How much did CENTIMARK FOUNDATION grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 76% of CENTIMARK FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

researchalzheimer'sbethanyvolunteershumaneministriesbackpack

2019

cntrmedbackpackhopepregnancyblessingsvalley

2020

bostonatlantacnty

2021

mcdonald hsehoustonbostonbackfamsanatlanta

2022

svdpmichaelhopeveteransyouthvalleyboys

2023

vin depaulfoundauberlemichaelhopeveteransyouth

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 175 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k44 grants · $150k
$10k–50k127 grants · $1.9M
$50k–250k4 grants · $296k

$10,000

Median grant

States reached

$6.0M

Total assets

Largest grants

THE EDUCATION PARTNERSHIP$120,500
SCHOOL SISTERS ST FRANCIS OF ASSISI$70,000
LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR$55,000
WASHINGTON CHRISTIAN OUTREACH$50,000
GREATER PGH COMMUNITY FOOD BANK$48,600
CITY RESCUE MISSION OF NEW CASTLE$45,000
WASHINGTON CITY MISSION$40,000
PETERS TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL$37,500
MARIANNA CHRISTIAN OUTREACH$35,000
PITTSBURGH HIRES VETERANS$30,000
HOPE GROWS$30,000
OUTDOOR ODYSSEY$30,000
ASHTABULA DREAM CENTER$30,000
SOUTH HILLS INTERFAITH MOVEMENT$30,000
MERAKEY FOUNDATION$25,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $1.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 11% — the area typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$10M · 176 repeat orgs$1.2M to everyone else

176 repeat relationships — 123 still active in FY2024, 53 since wound down; 49 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

176

132

Total granted

$10M

$722k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%

+65%

Still filing today

34%

24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 80% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $476k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesHealthFood & NutritionEducationPhilanthropyHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

WC
WASHINGTON CITY MISSION
8× · 2017–2024 · $741k · revenue +84%
WC
WASHINGTON CHRISTIAN OUTREACH
8× · 2017–2024 · $225k · revenue +1% · 27% of their budget
GW
GREATER WASHINGTON COUNTY FOOD BANK
6× · 2017–2024 · $113k · revenue +18%

Funded once

JA
JUBILEE ASSOCIATIONgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue +268%
CH
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PGH FOUND
one grant, 2023 · $75k
GA
GUARDIAN ANGELS MED SVC DOGS
one grant, 2019 · $25k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

St Francis House

Empowering families with chidren to achieve permanent and stable self-sufficiency by providing case management; nutritious meals; and educational, health and career resources; in a safe and secure environment.

Housing & Shelter

Central Pennsylvania Food Bank

Fighting hunger, improving lives, strengthening communities.

Food & Nutrition

Bethlehem Haven of Pittsburgh

To provide emergency overnight shelter and residential recovery programs

Human Services

The Baptist Home of Philadelphia

Dedicated to providing quality continuing care living facilities and support services in a christian environment respecting the dignity and sanctity of all individuals.

Human Services

Manna House Inc

To offer assistance and support to the homeless, poor and needy of baltimore with services contributing toward their independence and stability.

—

The Food Bank for Central

Hunger relief network sharing millions of pounds of nutritious food with thousands of missourians.

Food & Nutrition

Miracle Hill Ministries Inc

Miracle hill exists that homeless children and adults receive food and shelter with compassion, hear the good news of jesus christ, and move toward healthy relationships and stability.

Human Services

Mercy House Living Centers

To be the leader in ending homelessness by providing a unique system of dignified housing alternatives, programs, and supportive services.

Housing & Shelter

Hope Faith Ministries Inc

Hope Faith Ministries Inc. ("HFM") works to alleviate homelessness and poverty in the Kansas City area by providing basic necessities and assistance while also providing critical programs to help empower individuals

Human Services

Health Care for the Homeless Inc

Provides whole-person health care and supportive services to individuals and families experiencing homelessness.

—

Human Services Inc

Outpatient mental health, mental health residential, and homeless services.

Human Services

Metropolitan Area Neighborhood Nutrition

Manna uses nutrition to improve health for people with serious illnesses who need nourishment to heal. by providing medically tailored meals and nutrition education, we empower people to improve their health and quality of life.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is North Hills Community Outreach Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Single Mom Kc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 33 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 8% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.9%1/117

the rest of the field

6,105/78,045

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

109 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

104/109

Grantees still filing

87/109

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$8,883,218Human Services$1,629,800Health$362,600Food & Nutrition$184,900Philanthropy$146,000Education$136,000Employment$110,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pittsburgh FoundationPA71.3× affinity47 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pittsburgh Foundation · The United Way of Southwestern · Edward B Dunlap Jr Foundation · Aj and Sigismunda Palumbo Charitable Trust · Hillman Family Foundations · Eqt Foundation · Snee-Reinhardt Charitable Foundation · Richard King Mellon Foundation · Upmc Group · The Grable Foundation · Clapp G H Decd Char and Ed Tr · McElhattan Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation CENTIMARK FOUNDATION funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–24

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: PETERS TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

8 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +63% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 271188287 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on PETERS TOWNSHIP HIGH SCHOOL, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 88% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Centimark Foundation?

Find your warmest path to Centimark Foundation through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

CENTIMARK FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

109 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Centimark Foundation?

More from the funding graph

CENTIMARK FOUNDATION

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

109 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Centimark Foundation?

More from the funding graph