· Public charity
Slave 2 Nothing Foundation
The foundation supports organizations that assist individuals and their families in gaining freedom and healing from substance abuse and providing solutions to eliminate human trafficking.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k3 grants · $24k
- $10k–50k98 grants · $2.3M
- $50k–250k12 grants · $639k
- $250k+1 grant · $260k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WALTER HOVING HOME INC | $260,200 |
| TEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $89,100 |
| THE SALVATION ARMY - TUSTIN RANCH CORPSORANGE COUNTY COORDINATION | $50,000 |
| WALTER HOVING HOME INC | $50,000 |
| THE BRIDGE RESTORATION MINISTRY | $50,000 |
| ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION | $50,000 |
| TEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA | $50,000 |
| GENERATEHOPE INC | $50,000 |
| STREETLIGHTUSA | $50,000 |
| GOOD NEWS RESCUE MISSION | $50,000 |
| BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDRO | $50,000 |
| WALTER HOVING HOME INC | $50,000 |
| POLARIS PROJECT | $50,000 |
| ADULT AND TEEN CHALLENGE OF TEXAS | $45,000 |
| SAVING INNOCENCE INC | $45,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 88% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
113 repeat relationships — 89 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 15 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 95% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $175k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- WHWALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME7× · 2017–2024 · $785k · revenue +50%
- AAAdult and Teen Challenge of Texas7× · 2017–2024 · $475k · revenue +205%
- TCTEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTH CALIF INC7× · 2017–2024 · $471k · revenue +6%
Funded once
- DCDREAM CENTER FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2018 · $80k · revenue +89%
- JOJUST ONE RECOVERYone grant, 2018 · $35k
- BRBakersfield Recovery Servicesgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $31k · revenue +109%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Treating substance use disorders, rebuilding lives, strengthening families, and empowering women.
Samaritan House is committed to fostering personal safety, growth, and self-sufficiency in adults and their children through freedom from domestic violence, sexual assault, and human trafficking and removing their risks of homelessness.
We believe women deserve a chance to triumph over trauma and a place to become whole.
Safe Embrace is committed to ending the cycle of domestic and sexual violence with innovative prevention and intervention services. We help victims of domestic abuse, sexual assault, and human trafficking become survivors by providing…
Assisting and housing females in recovery
Casa is a refuge, providing protection and education for people caught in the cylces of domestic violence, sexual assault and child assault. Casa is a healing community where women and children can receive the nurturing and support…
Consejo brings healing, health, and hope to communities through holistic, culturally, and linguistically competent behavioral health services and advocacy.
Drug addiction rehabilitation program
House women with trauma, addiction
Covenant house new orleans (the organization) is a not-for-profit organization affiliated with 34 similar organizations across five countries, all of which are affiliates of covenant house international (parent affiliate) and share a…
At Friendly House, our mission is to inspire and empower women of all gender experiences, on their journey to overcoming substance use disorders and mental health challenges. Our program offers a blend of clinical expertise, cultural…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rebirth Homes Inc and the most unlike its peers is Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 26 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.7% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
141 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 141 of the 153 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds WALTER HOVING HOME INC DBA HOVING HOME ↗
- Who funds Adult and Teen Challenge of Texas ↗
- Who funds TEEN CHALLENGE OF SOUTH CALIF INC ↗
- Who funds POLARIS PROJECT ↗
- Who funds THE BEACON HOUSE ASSOCIATION OF SAN PEDRO ↗
- Who funds ORANGEWOOD FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds Rebirth Homes Inc ↗
- Who funds GENERATEHOPE INC ↗
- Who funds The Bridge Restoration Ministry ↗
- Who funds STREETLIGHTUSA ↗
- Who funds HUCKLEBERRY YOUTH PROGRAMS INC ↗
- Who funds GOOD NEWS RESCUE MISSION ↗
- Who funds COALITION TO ABOLISH SLAVERY & TRAFFICKING ↗
- Who funds SAVING INNOCENCE INC ↗
- Who funds ZOE INTERNATIONAL ↗
- Who funds THE TURNING POINT HOME OF SAN DIEGO ↗
- Who funds REFUGE FOR WOMEN INC ↗
- Who funds Traffick911 ↗
- Who funds MCALISTER INSTITUTE FOR TREATMENT & EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE RIVERS EDGE RANCH ↗
- Who funds Orange County Rescue Mission Inc ↗
- Who funds Womens Recovery ServicesA Unique Place ↗
- Who funds Awaken INC ↗
- Who funds WAYMAKERS ↗
- Who funds MARIPOSA WOMEN AND FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds Fresno County Economic Opportunities Commission ↗
- Who funds ROCK TO RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds BREAKING THE CHAINS ↗
- Who funds INNERCITY VISIONS ↗
- Who funds GOSPEL CENTER RESCUE MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds CITY HELP INC OF PHOENIX ↗
- Who funds Treasures Ministries ↗
- Who funds TRUCKERS AGAINST TRAFFICKING ↗
- Who funds HOOKERS FOR JESUS ↗
- Who funds CASA TERESA INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN ASSOCIATION OF UTAH ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: McMillen Family Foundation · Dignity Health · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Serving USA Inc Fka Serving California · Orange County Community Foundation · The Jensen Project Inc · In-N-Out Burgers Foundation · California Foundation for Stronger Communities · Texas Women's Foundation · The Devto Support Foundation · California Community Foundation · Our Rescue
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Slave 2 Nothing Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- A Village for One — 33% of income from government
- Safety Compass — 25% of income from government
- Rogue Retreat — 12% of income from government
- Addictions Recovery Center Inc — 9% of income from government
- Shatterproof a Nonprofit Corporation — 2% of income from government
- Truckers Against Trafficking — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Slave 2 Nothing Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Slave 2 Nothing Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.