Skip to content

Texas · Nonprofit

UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING

UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING (Texas) receives grants from 43 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,482,329 to it, the largest being United Way of Greater Houston ($472,394). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year.

Revenue FY2024
$1.7M
Funders on record
43
Grants received
$3.5M
Net assets
$27k
22/43 repeat funderspeak grant-dependency 38%
01What it does

What United Against Human Trafficking does

Mission

To end human trafficking through educating the community, preventing exploitation, and empowering survivors.

As stated on its FY2024 Form 990.

Programs

  1. Client Services now has two Case Managers, one of whom is bilingual. The team has developed a new program titled The Freedom Bloom Project, an 8-week trauma-informed program that focuses on building a variety of essential skills, including financial literacy, job readiness, understanding trauma and the brain, and empowerment.We also launched the Route to Independence Transportation Program, which helps clients learn how to navigate and utilize public transportation. Each client receives a personalized treatment plan tailored to their specific needs, ensuring holistic and individualized support.In addition, Client Services continues to strengthen partnerships with outside organizations to expand resources and opportunities for clients. These collaborations help provide access to employment pathways, financial education, mental health support, and community engagement opportunities, ensuring that clients receive wraparound care and long-term stability.Most recently, we introduced Brewed for Success, a new collaborative program with A 2nd Cup, which focuses on developing practical job skills, customer service experience, and workplace readiness through hands-on learning in a…

    $619,896 spent
    38% of program spending
  2. Our Community Awareness efforts continue to make a meaningful impact through trainings and educational sessions with youth and young adults in residential facilities, schools, and jails. These sessions focus on increasing awareness around human trafficking, healthy relationships, boundaries, and personal empowerment.We have continued to build and strengthen relationships, particularly with Cenikor, a chemical dependency agency, and the Harris County Jail, where our team provides ongoing education and support. These partnerships have also expanded into Fort Bend County, where we now collaborate with residential agencies and the Fort Bend Juvenile Detention Center, broadening our regional reach and deepening our engagement with vulnerable populations.Additionally, we have sustained our focus on serving and supporting the LGBTQ+ community through partnerships with Tonys Place and Madison High School, in collaboration with Civic Heart, a relationship that has remained strong for over seven years. These partnerships allow us to create safe, inclusive spaces where youth can learn, connect, and access critical resources.

    $619,895 spent
    38% of program spending
  3. The Prevention Department continues to make significant strides in increasing awareness and equipping professionals with the tools to identify and respond to human trafficking. This year, the team successfully trained the entire Houston Police Department in collaboration with the HPD Vice Unit, a comprehensive effort that included not only police officers but also accountants, pilots, administrative staff, and specialized units within the department.Beyond Houston, our Prevention team has been actively providing frontline professional trainings throughout Fort Bend County in partnership with the District Attorneys Office. These trainings have strengthened local capacity to recognize and respond to trafficking and have fostered stronger partnerships with social service and healthcare providers.Most recently, we expanded our reach to include Communities In Schools and the Houston Area Womens Center, where we trained social workers and case staff on identifying trafficking indicators, responding with a trauma-informed lens, and connecting survivors to appropriate resources. These collaborations reflect our ongoing commitment to ensuring that frontline professionals across multiple…

    $391,513 spent$238,109 earned by the program
    24% of program spending

The 3 programs described on its FY2024 Form 990, listed largest first by expense. Program spending in total: $1,631,304.

02The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($496k) Expenses 100 ($470k) Net assets 100 ($55k)2018 Revenue 184 ($914k) Expenses 157 ($739k) Net assets 414 ($230k)2019 Revenue 225 ($1.1M) Expenses 239 ($1.1M) Net assets 522 ($289k)2020 Revenue 258 ($1.3M) Expenses 257 ($1.2M) Net assets 650 ($360k)2021 Revenue 316 ($1.6M) Expenses 347 ($1.6M) Net assets 534 ($296k)2022 Revenue 350 ($1.7M) Expenses 333 ($1.6M) Net assets 746 ($414k)2023 Revenue 357 ($1.8M) Expenses 360 ($1.7M) Net assets 885 ($491k)2024 Revenue 344 ($1.7M) Expenses 454 ($2.1M) Net assets 48 ($27k)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Revenue (344)Expenses (454)Net assets (48)Peer revenue range

Balance sheet

Total assets and total liabilities at each year end, in dollars. The largest one-year move in total assets was 2023 to 2024, from $591k to $1.3M (+128%).

$55k
$235k
$331k
$417k
$374k
$619k
$591k
$1.3M
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Total assetsTotal liabilities

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Government-grant reliance: 2017 35% · 2018 29% · 2019 47% · 2020 56% · 2021 51% · 2022 29% · 2023 31% · 2024 36%. Grants only. Government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.

85% of UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING’s revenue is contributions — more donation-reliant than the typical peer (81% for the typical peer).

This organization
Typical peer · 11,793 orgs

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 3 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.

$26k
’17
$174k
’18
−$5k
’19
$71k
’20
−$64k
’21
$173k
’22
$77k
’23
−$427k
’24
0.7
months of
reserve

Leadership and staff

The officers, directors, trustees and key employees listed on each return. Joined and no longer listed compare each filing with the year before, matching people by surname and first initial; a year after a gap, or a roster under three people, has no comparison.

Chief executive

Timeka Walker

CEO

Board chair

Thomas Kennedy

Chair

As listed on its FY2024 Form 990.

'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24
Listed111313101081211
Joined·+5+2+3+1+1+5+2
No longer listed·3261313
03Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base broadened from 3 funders to 17 funders, grant income rose $80k → $668k.

11 of 43 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 14% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.

From the IRS filings of UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 30 of 43 funders by total. Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING has a broad base — no single funder exceeds 14% of grant income, and it takes 5 funders to reach half.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 5 funders to its left

37% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING.

14%
largest funder
37%
top three
~13
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 62% · 2018 40% · 2019 40% · 2020 33% · 2021 29% · 2022 19% · 2023 35% — diversifying over time.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How long its funders stay

38% of UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 51% give in more than one year at all.

first grant+1y+2y+3y+4y+5y

Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year. Measured to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving — a funder cannot be counted as lapsed in a year most filers have not reached.

Where its funders are

92% of UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING's grant income comes from Texas funders.

NY
NJ
CA
UT
LA
TX

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

’17
’18
’19
’20
’21
’22
’23
Texas out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. $501k arriving through sponsors registered in 11 states is excluded from the map and the split above: a sponsor holds money on a donor’s behalf, so its registered address would place those dollars somewhere no donor need ever have been. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

04Its place in the field

Against its field

UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING has grown faster than three-quarters of the 11,263 human services nonprofits its size.

Operating margin−25% · bottom quartile
Months of reserve0.7mo · bottom quartile
Revenue growth (annualized)19% · top quartile

this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 11,263 human services nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024

Government funding UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING receives

Grants and contracts to this organization from federal (USASpending) and state checkbooks, reconciled to its EIN. $2.3M on record.

Federal$2.3M
grants $2.3Mcontracts $0
20
23
24
Top agencies
  • Department of Justice$2.3M

Federal grants vs contracts are distinguished; state line items keep their reported category. Matched by name + geography (the BMF), so coverage is partial and precision-first.

Organizations like UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING

Organizations whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over every organization in the US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In Texas

Nationally

05Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

76% of spending goes to programs.

Program 76%Management 14%Fundraising 10%

Governance

9
board members
100%
independent
✓Conflict-of-interest policy✓Whistleblower policy✓Document retention✓Board reviewed the 990✓Audited financials

Public support

95%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. Screen this nonprofit · How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING?
UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING (Texas) receives grants from 43 organizations whose IRS filings report $3,482,329 to it, the largest being United Way of Greater Houston ($472,394). 22 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING have?
IRS filings report 43 organizations giving $3,482,329 in grants to UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING, 22 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING?
United Way of Greater Houston is the largest funder on record, with $472,394 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like UNITED AGAINST HUMAN TRAFFICKING find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in Texas. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

Play a game about who funds United Against Human Trafficking →

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 43 funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported October 14, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing