· Private foundation
Schreck Family Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TORAH INSTITUTE OF BALTIMORE | $6,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION OF IDAHO | $3,000 |
| GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK | $2,000 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION | $2,000 |
| ACLU FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| TREVOR PROJECT | $2,000 |
| MAZON | $2,000 |
| AMERICANS FOR PEACE NOW | $2,000 |
| CONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM OF BERGEN | $1,980 |
| NEW ISRAEL FUND | $1,000 |
| NAACP LEGAL DEFENSE EDUCATION FUND | $1,000 |
| MIDWEST ANIMAL RESCUE SERVICES | $1,000 |
| NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN'S F | $1,000 |
| BOSTON AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER | $1,000 |
| PROPUBLICA | $1,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
47 repeat relationships — 19 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +242%
- KPKenworthy Performing Arts Centre Inc8× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +498%
- MAMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger8× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +50%
Funded once
- SJSABES JCC OF GREATER MINNEAPOLISone grant, 2017 · $4k
- JRJEWISH RECORDS INDEXING-POLANDgraduatedone grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue +32%
- CFCENTER FOR MINDFULNESS COMPASSIONone grant, 2022 · $1k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.
The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.
To achieve legal and systematic change that addresses violence and discrimination against women and girls around the world.
Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…
Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…
Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…
The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.
To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…
Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…
The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.
Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.
In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Democracy Forward Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Jewish Records Indexing-Poland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 28 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds Kenworthy Performing Arts Centre Inc ↗
- Who funds NEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
- Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
- Who funds BOSTON AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
- Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNERS' ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
- Who funds ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
- Who funds TASH INC ↗
- Who funds Backyard Harvest Inc ↗
- Who funds CROSSROADS ANTI-RACISM ORGANIZING & TRAINING ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK ↗
- Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL ↗
- Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
- Who funds RADIO FREE MOSCOW INC DBA KRFP ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Latah County Community Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Schreck Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Victim Rights Law Center Inc — 89% of income from government
- Boston Area Rape Crisis Center Inc — 82% of income from government
- Greater Boston Food Bank Inc — 22% of income from government
- Artists for Humanity Inc — 2% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.