Skip to content

· Private foundation

Schreck Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$41k
Granted FY2025still arriving
32
Grants FY2025still arriving
13
States reached
$6k
Largest
01What it funds
0193% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Civil Rights$57kReligion$44kFood & Nutrition$37kArts & Culture$29kInternational$27kHealth$22kHuman Services$21kEducation$11kOther$0
02FY2025 · 32 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,000
Median grant
13
States reached
$325k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
TORAH INSTITUTE OF BALTIMORE$6,000
ACLU FOUNDATION OF IDAHO$3,000
MAZON$2,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION$2,000
GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK$2,000
AMERICANS FOR PEACE NOW$2,000
ACLU FOUNDATION$2,000
TREVOR PROJECT$2,000
CONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM OF BERGEN$1,980
BOSTON AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER$1,000
ROBERT BALDWIN FDTN OF ACLU OF ILLI$1,000
NATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN'S F$1,000
DEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION$1,000
BRENNAN CENTER FOR JUSTICE AT NYU L$1,000
YOUNG CENTER FOR IMMIGRANT CHILDREN$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 96% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 8%SPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SER: $2k → 12%MENUCHA: $500 → 11%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $500 → 8%SPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SER: $2k → 12%SPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SER: $2k → 12%SPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SER: $2k → 12%SPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SER: $2k → 12%SPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SER: $2k → 12%SPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SER: $2k → 12%VICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER: $1k → 16%DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $500 → 11%DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $500 → 11%DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $500 → 11%DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $500 → 11%DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $500 → 11%FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS: $500 → 16%FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS: $500 → 16%FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS: $500 → 16%FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS: $500 → 16%FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS: $500 → 16%FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS: $500 → 16%FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS: $500 → 16%FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS: $500 → 16%MOSCOW CONTEMPORARY INC: $250 → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
WA
ID
MN
IL
NY
MA
NJ
CA
VA
MD
DC
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$251k · 47 repeat orgs$30k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +36% for those funded once.

47 repeat relationships: 19 still active in FY2025, 28 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

47
17

Total granted

$251k
$16k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+36%

Still filing today

57%
29%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 66% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $14k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsHealthInternationalEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    SPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES
    7× · 2017–2023 · $14k · revenue +242%
  • KP
    Kenworthy Performing Arts Centre Inc
    8× · 2017–2024 · $12k · revenue +498%
  • MA
    MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger
    8× · 2017–2025 · $9k · revenue +50%

Funded once

  • SJ
    SABES JCC OF GREATER MINNEAPOLIS
    one grant, 2017 · $4k
  • PR
    PULLMAN REGIONAL HOSPITAL FDTN
    one grant, 2020 · $1k
  • WF
    WSU FOUNDATION - COLLEGE OF BUSINES
    one grant, 2018 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Indigenous Peoples Rights Inc

To lead and coordinate the global initiative to address and prevent criminalization, violence, and impunity against indigenous peoples towards strengthening their collectives, solidarity, and actions.

Human Services
2
Jewish Coalition for Immigrant Justice Northwest

The jewish coalition builds a jewish voice in the pacific northwest advancing immigrant justice and domestic policy, following the leadership of impacted community.

Human Services
3
Equality Now Inc

To achieve legal and systematic change that addresses violence and discrimination against women and girls around the world.

International
4
Free Press

Free press was created to give people a voice in the crucial decisions that shape our media. we believe that positive social change, racial justice and meaningful engagement in public life require equitable access to technology, diverse…

Arts & Culture
5
Forward Together

Forward Together is a national reproductive justice organization that centers people, families, and communities who experience reproductive oppression. They prioritize queer, trans, Black, Indigenous, and other peoples of color and utilize…

Health
6
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science
7
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
8
Women's Refugee Commission Inc

To improve the lives and protect the rights of women, children and youth displaced by conflict and crisis. the women's refugee commission envisions a world in which refugees are safe, healthy and reliant and seeks to drive change in…

Human Services
9
Justice Action Center

Justice Action Center JAC pilots an innovative model that advances the rights of immigrant communities by connecting cutting-edge impact litigation and compelling narrative and communications content. The purpose of JAC is to advance the…

Civil Rights
10
Guttmacher Institute Inc

The institute is a leading research and policy organization committed to advancing sexual and reproductive health and rights in the united states and globally.

—
11
Aclu Foundation of Massachusetts Inc

Aclu foundation of ma was established to defend freedoms guaranteed in the constitution and bill of rights through public education and litigation.

Civil Rights
12
International Bridges to Justice

In recognition of the fundamental principles of the universal declaration of human rights, international bridges to justice (ibj) is dedicated to protecting the basic legal rights of ordinary citizens in developing countries. specifically,…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Democracy Forward Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Jewish Records Indexing-Poland. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

41 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 41 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
10
Early backer (in before they grew)
39/41
Grantees still filing
24/41
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACLU FOUNDATION OF IDAHO: $36,000 · OtherACLU FOUNDATION OF IDAHOCONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM OF BERGEN: $14,940 · OtherCONGREGATION BETH ABRAHAM OF BERGENMOSCOW FOOD BANK: $13,000 · OtherMOSCOW FOOD BANKTORAH INSTITUTE OF BALTIMORE INC: $10,000 · OtherMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $9,000 · OtherLATAH COUNTY LIBRARY DISTRICT: $8,000 · OtherGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $7,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $7,000 · OtherFESTIVAL DANCE AND PERFORMING: $7,000 · OtherNATIONAL ORGANIZATION FOR WOMEN'S F: $7,000 · Other+37 more: $71,490 · Other+37 moreSPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $13,800 · Human ServicesSPOKANE A…FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $4,000 · Human ServicesFRIENDLY …DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $2,500 · Human ServicesDIVISION …VICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 · Human ServicesFOOTSTEPS INC: $1,000 · Human Services+2 more: $750 · Human ServicesKenworthy Performing Arts Centre Inc: $12,280 · Arts & CultureARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureRADIO FREE MOSCOW INC DBA KRFP: $1,750 · Arts & CultureSPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS: $1,500 · Arts & CultureTHE RHAPSODY PROJECT: $1,000 · Arts & CultureJEWISH RECORDS INDEXING-POLAND: $1,000 · Arts & CulturePRO PUBLICA INC: $1,000 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $500 · Arts & CultureNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC: $11,000 · InternationalNEW ISRAEL FUND: $10,000 · InternationalCURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL: $2,000 · InternationalCROSSROADS ANTI-RACISM ORGANIZING & TRAINING: $2,500 · Civil RightsEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,500 · Civil RightsAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 · Civil RightsWASSMUTH CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS HOME OF THE ANNE FRANK MEMORIAL: $1,180 · Civil RightsTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $1,000 · Civil RightsBOSTON AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC: $8,000 · HealthGRITMAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 · HealthSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,500 · HealthNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $5,000 · EnvironmentEARTHJUSTICE: $2,000 · Environment
Other$190,930Human Services$24,050Arts & Culture$23,030International$23,000Civil Rights$11,180Health$11,000Environment$7,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES: $13,800 over 7y, 2.9% of budgetKenworthy Performing Arts Centre Inc: $12,280 over 8y, 1.8% of budgetNEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC: $11,000 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetNEW ISRAEL FUND: $10,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger: $9,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetBOSTON AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetGREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC: $7,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetNATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS INC: $4,000 over 8y, 1.0% of budgetSOJOURNERS' ALLIANCE INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTASH INC: $3,750 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetBackyard Harvest Inc: $3,000 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetCROSSROADS ANTI-RACISM ORGANIZING & TRAINING: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetDIVISION OF INDIAN WORK: $2,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetRADIO FREE MOSCOW INC DBA KRFP: $1,750 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetHolocaust Center For Humanity: $1,750 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetGRITMAN MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSPRINGBOARD FOR THE ARTS: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSWEDISH MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetWASSMUTH CENTER FOR HUMAN RIGHTS HOME OF THE ANNE FRANK MEMORIAL: $1,180 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBIG SISTER ASSOCIATION OF GREATER BOSTON INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHITMAN COUNTY HUMANE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetDEMOCRACY FORWARD FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE RHAPSODY PROJECT: $1,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetJEWISH RECORDS INDEXING-POLAND: $1,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVICTIM RIGHTS LAW CENTER INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PALOUSE: $1,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFOOTSTEPS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRURAL ROOTS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetMOSCOW CONTEMPORARY INC: $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SPOKANE AREA JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds Kenworthy Performing Arts Centre Inc ↗
  • Who funds NEW JEWISH NARRATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ISRAEL FUND ↗
  • Who funds MAZON A Jewish Response to Hunger ↗
  • Who funds BOSTON AREA RAPE CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds GREATER BOSTON FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDLY NEIGHBORS SENIOR CITIZENS INC ↗
  • Who funds SOJOURNERS' ALLIANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds ARTISTS FOR HUMANITY INC ↗
  • Who funds TASH INC ↗
  • Who funds Backyard Harvest Inc ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS ANTI-RACISM ORGANIZING & TRAINING ↗
  • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
  • Who funds DIVISION OF INDIAN WORK ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CURE VIOLENCE GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds EARTHJUSTICE ↗
  • Who funds RADIO FREE MOSCOW INC DBA KRFP ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Latah County Community FoundationID20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 5 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Latah County Community Foundation · The Avista Foundation · Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Associated Jewish Charities of Baltimore · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Schreck Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Schreck Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 82%
  • Victim Rights Law Center Inc: 89% of income from government
  • Boston Area Rape Crisis Center Inc: 82% of income from government
  • Greater Boston Food Bank Inc: 22% of income from government
  • Artists for Humanity Inc: 2% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
2rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 77 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Schreck Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph