· Private foundation
Latah County Community Foundation
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k27 grants · $42k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $45k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Alternative Giving Market of the Pa | $44,620 |
| Palouse Alternatives to Violence | $3,235 |
| Whitepine School District | $3,000 |
| Sojourners Alliance | $3,000 |
| Troy Youth Baseball | $2,700 |
| Individual grant recipient | $2,045 |
| Moscow Volunteer Fire Dept | $2,000 |
| Moscow Contemporary | $2,000 |
| Family Promise of the Palouse Inc | $2,000 |
| Habitat For Humanity | $2,000 |
| City of Deary Idaho | $2,000 |
| Lael Inc | $1,725 |
| Palouse Land Trust | $1,500 |
| Inland Oasis | $1,500 |
| Individual grant recipient | $1,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $23k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
45 repeat relationships — 17 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $18k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FPFAMILY PROMISE OF THE PALOUSE INC5× · 2019–2024 · $15k · revenue +754%
- PLPALOUSE LAND TRUST INC4× · 2019–2024 · $8k · revenue +197%
- MDMOSCOW DAY SCHOOL INC2× · 2021–2022 · $5k · revenue +51%
Funded once
- PSPotlatch School Music Departmentone grant, 2019 · $3k
- FOFRIENDS OF PHILLIPS FARM INCone grant, 2021 · $3k
- KEKendrick-Juliaetta Ed Foundationone grant, 2017 · $3k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To embrace, equip, and empower immigrants through access to culturally informed essential services, and facilitate covnnections to grow deeper roots and thrive in Spokane.
Provide services to people before, throughout, and after an unplanned pregnancy.
To help families with children in our community who are situationally homeless achieve sustainable independence through a community based response by providing temporary housing, usually 60-90 days, along with case management.
Idaho Animal Rescue Network is a 501(c)(3) non-profit based in Idaho that works in Idaho and Eastern Washington to educate, advocate, and network with other rescues and law enforcement in Idaho regarding animal cruelty and neglect. We are…
To provide suitable and affordable lodging for chapter members of farmhouse fraternity at the university of idaho in moscow, idaho
To provide mental health and chemical dependency prevention and treatment programs in Whitman County, Washington.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Family Promise of the Palouse Inc and the most unlike its peers is Animal House Ferals. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 19 years old; the field is 20. You back the younger end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 11% of your grantees by number, and just 15% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 100 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF THE PALOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds PALOUSE LAND TRUST INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANE SOCIETY OF THE PALOUSE ↗
- Who funds MOSCOW CONTEMPORARY INC ↗
- Who funds MOSCOW DAY SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds MOSCOW CHARTER SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds LATAH COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds HEART OF THE ARTS INC ↗
- Who funds INLAND OASIS INC ↗
- Who funds SOJOURNERS' ALLIANCE INC ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE CLEARWATER INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Avista Foundation · Lewis-Clark Valley Healthcare Foundation · Laura Moore Cunningham Foundation Inc · Innovia Foundation · Idaho Community Foundation Inc · Schreck Family Foundation · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Latah County Community Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.