Skip to content
Plinth
← Funding

South Dakota · Nonprofit

THE SUMMIT LEAGUE

THE SUMMIT LEAGUE (South Dakota) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $79,533,399 to it, the largest being National Collegiate Athletic Association ($73,070,775). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.

$8.5M
Revenue FY2025
4
Funders on record
$80M
Grants received
$5.1M
Net assets
3/4 repeat fundersgrants exceed reported revenue in one year

Three funders worth looking at

Grantmakers with no record of funding this organization, ranked by how strongly the co-funder graph and the mission embeddings agree. The evidence is in section 03.

See all 12 prospects and why each one surfaced →
01The organization over time

The organization over time

Each line starts at 100 in 2017, so what you read is the shape rather than the size: 150 means half as much again as 2017, 50 means half. The number beside each label in the key is where it ended.

100 = 20172017 Revenue 100 ($5.9M) Expenses 100 ($6.1M) Net assets 100 ($2.3M)2018 Revenue 104 ($6.2M) Expenses 99 ($6.0M) Net assets 108 ($2.4M)2019 Revenue 142 ($8.4M) Expenses 130 ($7.9M) Net assets 132 ($3.0M)2020 Revenue 145 ($8.6M) Expenses 138 ($8.4M) Net assets 142 ($3.2M)2021 Revenue 95 ($5.7M) Expenses 115 ($6.9M) Net assets 140 ($3.2M)2022 Revenue 114 ($6.8M) Expenses 105 ($6.4M) Net assets 158 ($3.6M)2023 Revenue 146 ($8.7M) Expenses 136 ($8.2M) Net assets 179 ($4.1M)2024 Revenue 152 ($9.0M) Expenses 135 ($8.2M) Net assets 217 ($4.9M)2025 Revenue 143 ($8.5M) Expenses 137 ($8.3M) Net assets 226 ($5.1M)
'17'18'19'20'21'22'23'24'25
Revenue (143)Expenses (137)Net assets (226)

How it's funded, over time

Each bar is one year's revenue split into where it came from, and every bar is the same height — these are shares, not amounts, so a year that raised twice as much looks the same size. Hover a bar for the split.

2017
2018
2019
2020
2021
2022
2023
2024
2025
ContributionsProgram revenueInvestmentOther

Surplus & reserves

Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 2 of the last 9 reported years ran a deficit.

$113k
17
$174k
18
$549k
19
$235k
20
$1.3M
21
$414k
22
$474k
23
$847k
24
$197k
25
8.8
months of
reserve
02Who funds it

Who funds it, year by year

2017 → 2023: the base held at 2 funders, grant income rose $8.1M → $11M.

Funder
'17
'18
'19
'20
'21
'22
'23
'24*
total
$6.4M
funders
2
1
4
3
3
3
2
2

From the IRS filings of THE SUMMIT LEAGUE’s funders (the co-funder graph). Association, not causation. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

How concentrated its funding is

THE SUMMIT LEAGUE leans on a few funders — its largest provides 92% of grant income and the top three 100%; half comes from just 1 funder.

the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left

100% of the income these shares are computed over arrives through pass-through sponsors or from payers whose filings do not say what kind of payment it is. Concentration is still measured over all of it, because the money is real; what it does not support is a claim about how many institutions have chosen to fund THE SUMMIT LEAGUE.

92%
largest funder
100%
top three
~1
effective funders

Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 100% · 2018 100% · 2019 86% · 2020 74% · 2021 86% · 2022 87% · 2023 100%broadly stable.

“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

Where its funders are

THE SUMMIT LEAGUE draws 92% of its grant income from funders outside South Dakota, across 3 states in all.

SD
IN
CA

In-state vs out-of-state, by year

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
South Dakota out of state home

Funder states come from each funder’s own filing. Trends are read to FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving. FY2024–FY2026 are still being filed and are shown unshaded; they do not move any figure on this page.

03Its place in the field

Funders to approach

Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 4 funders put you under-funded among the 400 organizations that share them.

From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.

Organizations like THE SUMMIT LEAGUE

Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.

In South Dakota

Nationally

04Profile & governance

Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.

Where the money goes

85% of spending goes to programs.

Program 85%Management 15%Fundraising 0%

Governance

9
board members
0%
independent
Conflict-of-interest policyWhistleblower policyDocument retentionBoard reviewed the 990Audited financials

Public support

97%

Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.

Screen this organization

A dated, signed PDF of the compliance screen for THE SUMMIT LEAGUE: IRS status (Business Master File, Publication 78, auto-revocation), the OFAC sanctions lists, the Internal Revenue Bulletin, and California registration, with the Rev. Proc. 2018-32 §8.01 reliance elements stated element by element. Generated from the current files at the moment you download it.

A paid feature, included from the $75 plan up. Sign in to download.

Screens are triage, not determinations; a source that cannot be read reports not screened, never clear. How the screen works · on the API as GET /api/screening/{ein}?format=pdf

Questions and answers

Who funds THE SUMMIT LEAGUE?
THE SUMMIT LEAGUE (South Dakota) receives grants from 4 organizations whose IRS filings report $79,533,399 to it, the largest being National Collegiate Athletic Association ($73,070,775). 3 of them have funded it in more than one year.
How many funders does THE SUMMIT LEAGUE have?
IRS filings report 4 organizations giving $79,533,399 in grants to THE SUMMIT LEAGUE, 3 of which have funded it in more than one year.
Who is the largest funder of THE SUMMIT LEAGUE?
National Collegiate Athletic Association is the largest funder on record, with $73,070,775 in grants. The full list of funders is on this page.
How can an organization like THE SUMMIT LEAGUE find more funders?
Start with the funders already giving here, then look at the foundations that back similar organizations in South Dakota. The funding by cause and by state pages list the largest funders for a given area and how to approach them.

These figures are read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML: this organization’s own return for FY2025 (financials across 2017–2025), and the filings of 4funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. Trends on this page end at FY2023, the last fiscal year that has finished arriving; later years are shown and marked, and move no figure. Data on this page was exported August 27, 2026. What this page cannot tell you · view filing