Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$1.0M
Granted FY2025still arriving
284
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$60k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.

Health$2.0MEducation$886kHuman Services$665kPhilanthropy$623kYouth Development$264kRecreation & Sports$248kFood & Nutrition$225kCommunity Improvement$163kOther$0
02FY2025 · 284 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k258 grants · $480k
  • $10k–50k25 grants · $469k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $60k
$1,500
Median grant
11
States reached
$23M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
United Way of Cass-Clay$60,000
Junior Achievement North$45,000
North Dakota Autism Center$40,000
Boys & Girls Clubs of America$30,000
FirstLink$26,500
American Indian Public Health Resource Center$25,000
Standing Rock Community Development Corporation$25,000
Hazelton Development Corporation$25,000
Spectra Health$25,000
Great Plains Food Bank$25,000
Turtle Mountain Chippewa Heritage Center$20,000
American Foundation for Suicide Prevention ND Chapter$19,500
Fargo Moorhead Coalition to End Homelessness$15,000
Sacred Pipe Resource Center$15,000
Immigrant Development Center$15,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–25, $512k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 65% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%ESHARA: $5k → 14%Standing Rock Community Development Corporation: $25k → 33%Lutheran Social Services of MN: $10k → 14%Standing Rock Community Development Corporation: $8k → 33%Dream Center Bismarck: $35k → 10%Lutheran Social Service of Minnesota: $3k → 14%Project BEE: $10k → 10%Sacred Pipe Resource Center: $15k → 10%Fix It Forward Ministry: $5k → 11%Independence Inc: $5k → 10%Project BEE: $5k → 10%Hopes Landing WEM: $3k → 9%Independence Inc: $3k → 10%Project BEE: $3k → 10%North Dakota Autism Center: $40k → 12%ND Autism Center: $15k → 12%North Dakota Autism Center: $8k → 12%Global Friends Coalition: $5k → 13%Haleys Hope: $8k → 12%TR 4 Heart and Soul: $3k → 10%Haleys Hope: $3k → 12%Youthworks: $3k → 10%TR Heart N Soul: $3k → 10%Cares for Cancer: $5k → 10%Dakota Children's Advocacy Center: $15k → 10%Prairie Harvest Mental Health: $20k → 13%Missouri Valley Family YMCA: $10k → 10%Missouri Valley Family YMCA: $10k → 10%Missouri Valley Family YMCA: $10k → 10%Missouri Valley Family YMCA: $10k → 10%Missouri Valley Family YMCA: $10k → 10%Native American Development Center: $8k → 10%Mountain-Plains Youth Services Coalition: $5k → 10%Dakota Childrens Advocacy Center: $3k → 10%Bismarck Global Neighbors: $3k → 10%Rape and Abuse Crisis Center: $5k → 12%Handi-Wheels Transportation: $4k → 12%FirstLink: $27k → 12%Nexus-PATH Family Health: $23k → 12%Rape and Abuse Crisis Center: $15k → 12%Nexus-PATH Family Healing: $8k → 12%FirstLink: $6k → 12%Youthworks: $5k → 12%Southeastern North Dakota Community Action Agency: $15k → 12%Community of Care: $3k → 12%Community of Care: $5k → 12%Community of Care: $5k → 12%Community of Care: $5k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ND
MN
IL
WI
NY
SD
IA
CO
NE
VA
MD
TN
DC
LA
GA
TX

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$3.9M · 256 repeat orgs$1.5M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +26% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.

256 repeat relationships — 127 still active in FY2025, 129 since wound down; 107 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

256
432

Total granted

$3.9M
$1.2M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+26%
+12%

Still filing today

57%
24%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $289k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthHuman ServicesEducationAnimalsRecreation & SportsYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SH
    SPECTRA HEALTH
    5× · 2018–2025 · $117k · revenue +87%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA
    3× · 2023–2025 · $90k · revenue +35%
  • GP
    Great Plains Food Bank
    8× · 2018–2025 · $90k · revenue +39%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $54k
  • CH
    COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE OF THE DAKOTASgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $40k · revenue +53%
  • NC
    Native Community Development Inc dba Native Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $35k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Dakota Natural Resources Trust
—
2
North Dakota News Cooperative
Arts & Culture
3
Face It Together - Bismarck-Mandan

To get people with addiction and their loved ones well.

Human Services
4
North Dakota Assistive

North Dakota Assistive delivers services to people with disabilities so they can get the assistive technology they need for work, school, and home.

Education
5
North Dakota Long Term Care Association

We are a professional association of long term care and community service providers who enhance the lives of people we serve through collaboration, education and advocacy.

—
6
Northwood Deaconess Health Center

Serve as a local access to a full range of health care services. continue as a leader in primary care for the whole family, in care of the elderly, and in emergency services. Function as a focal point for health education and wellness.

Health
7
Nd Association of Counties

NDACo provides leadership and services to foster effective and efficient government for the good of all counties.

—
8
Family Wellness Bismarck-Mandan Llc

Committed to improving the wellness of families.

Human Services
9
St Luke's Home

St. Luke's Home and its assisted living facility, Park Avenue Villa, exist to provide a continuum of quality care to God's people, creating a compassionate, comfortable, and family oriented atmosphere, striving to enhance the dignity and…

Human Services
10
Jacobson Memorial Hospital Care Center

To advance the health of patients and communities we serve through a culture of leadership, continuous improvement and accountability. Jacobson Memorial Hospital Care Center (JMHCC) understands the relationship that exists between body,…

Health
11
Dickinson Area Chamber of Commerce

The dickinson area chamber of commerce will provide leadership to promote a progressive business environment.

—
12
Feeding South Dakota

To eliminate hunger in south dakota.

Food & Nutrition

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of North Dakota and the most unlike its peers is Matthew 25 Project Minot. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadySenior Care and Rural Healt…Early Childhood Care CentersFamily Philanthropic Founda…Specialized Education Schoo…Bismarck Community Support …North Dakota Education Foun…Regional Arts & Community D…Professional & Trade Associ…Labor Union AdvocacyRural Community SupportFaith-Based Community AidCollegiate Greek Life Organ…Veterans and Fraternal Orga…Supportive Housing & Servic…Wildlife Conservation & Edu…Regional Community ServicesNorth Dakota Industry Assoc…Volunteer Fire ServicesYouth Sports ProgramsHomeless Support Services
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number20%9%<5yr13%16%5–10yr18%18%10–20yr17%19%20–35yr16%22%35–55yr16%16%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value20%4%<5yr13%12%5–10yr18%18%10–20yr17%25%20–35yr16%11%35–55yr16%31%55yr+

The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 9% of your grantees by number, and just 4% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/339
the rest of the field
14%
1,708/12,561

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

293 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 293 of the 799 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
87
Early backer (in before they grew)
284/293
Grantees still filing
189/293
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

United Way of Cass-Clay — $451,906 · OtherUnited Way of Cass-ClayUND Grants & Contracts Administration — $313,498 · OtherUND Grants & Contracts AdministrationNorth Dakota State University — $122,300 · OtherUniversity of North Dakota — $105,140 · Other+128 more — $2,069,106 · Other+128 moreSPECTRA HEALTH — $117,296 · HealthSPECTRA HEALT…Dakota Medical Foundation — $53,450 · HealthDakota Medica…WOMEN EMPOWERING WOMEN — $52,000 · HealthWOMEN EMPOWER…COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE OF THE DAKOTAS — $40,000 · HealthCOMMUNITY HEA…ESSENTIA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $39,000 · HealthESSENTIA HEAL…HERO HEALTHCARE EQUIPMENT RECYCLING ORGANIZATION — $35,500 · HealthHERO HEALTHCA…FAMILY VOICES OF NORTH DAKOTA INC — $35,000 · HealthFAMILY VOICES…NORTHLAND HEALTH PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $35,000 · HealthNORTHLAND HEA…DAKOTA FAMILY SERVICES — $30,000 · HealthWESTERN WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC — $21,000 · HealthHEARTVIEW FOUNDATION — $20,000 · HealthBRAVE THE SHAVE — $19,667 · Health+9 more — $75,338 · Health+9 moreNorth Dakota Autism Center Inc — $64,202 · Human ServicesNorth Dakot…Missouri Valley Family YMCA — $47,500 · Human ServicesMissouri Va…Dream Center Bismarck — $37,500 · Human ServicesDream Cente…FIRSTLINK — $35,561 · Human ServicesFIRSTLINKSTANDING ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT — $32,500 · Human ServicesSTANDING RO…NEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING — $31,087 · Human ServicesNEXUS-PATH …Rape and Abuse Crisis Center of Fargo-Moorhead — $25,100 · Human ServicesCommunity of Care — $21,752 · Human ServicesPROJECT BEE — $20,200 · Human ServicesPRAIRIE HARVEST MENTAL HEALTH — $20,000 · Human ServicesHope Blooms — $19,790 · Human ServicesSOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $18,000 · Human ServicesDAKOTA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $17,500 · Human Services+12 more — $102,600 · Human Services+12 moreBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $90,000 · Youth DevelopmentBIO Girls Inc — $45,600 · Youth DevelopmentBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY — $10,600 · Youth DevelopmentRed River Childrens Advocacy Center — $10,453 · Youth DevelopmentANNE CARLSEN CENTER — $39,100 · EducationBismarck State College Foundation — $37,500 · EducationUniversity of Mary — $20,000 · EducationPEACE ACADEMY INC — $12,700 · EducationUniversity of Jamestown — $12,500 · EducationCANKDESKA CIKANA COMMUNITY COLLEGE — $12,500 · EducationUCODEGIRL — $5,200 · EducationHAGAN ELEMENTARY PTO — $5,000 · EducationMISSOURI SLOPE AREAWIDE UNITED WAY — $67,250 · PhilanthropySOURIS VALLEY UNITED WAY — $27,450 · PhilanthropyFOUNDATION FOR A HEALTHY NORTH DAKOTA — $13,500 · PhilanthropyImpact Foundation — $10,500 · PhilanthropyNORTH DAKOTA DENTAL FOUNDATION — $5,000 · PhilanthropyTNT Kid's Fitness — $60,500 · Recreation & SportsFargo Park District Foundation — $22,750 · Recreation & SportsJAMESTOWN PARKS AND RECREATION FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · Recreation & SportsSPECIAL OLYMPICS NORTH DAKOTA INC — $6,616 · Recreation & SportsPRAIRIE GRIT ADAPTIVE SPORTS — $6,000 · Recreation & Sports
Other$3,061,950Health$573,251Human Services$493,292Youth Development$156,653Education$144,500Philanthropy$123,700Recreation & Sports$105,866

Showing your 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetUnited Way of Cass-Clay — $451,906 over 8y, 1.1% of budgetSPECTRA HEALTH — $117,296 over 5y, 0.7% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA — $90,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGreat Plains Food Bank — $89,614 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMISSOURI SLOPE AREAWIDE UNITED WAY — $67,250 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetNorth Dakota Autism Center Inc — $64,202 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetTNT Kid's Fitness — $60,500 over 5y, 1.6% of budgetYWCA CASS CLAY — $55,000 over 7y, 0.6% of budgetDakota Medical Foundation — $53,450 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetWOMEN EMPOWERING WOMEN — $52,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetMissouri Valley Family YMCA — $47,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetBIO Girls Inc — $45,600 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetF5 PROJECT — $42,404 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetCOMMUNITY HEALTHCARE OF THE DAKOTAS — $40,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetANNE CARLSEN CENTER — $39,100 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetESSENTIA HEALTH FOUNDATION — $39,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBismarck State College Foundation — $37,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetDream Center Bismarck — $37,500 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetFIRSTLINK — $35,561 over 7y, 1.1% of budgetHERO HEALTHCARE EQUIPMENT RECYCLING ORGANIZATION — $35,500 over 8y, 0.8% of budgetFAMILY VOICES OF NORTH DAKOTA INC — $35,000 over 1y, 7.5% of budgetNORTHLAND HEALTH PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER — $35,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetVillage Family Service Center — $32,925 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetNEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING — $31,087 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ND — $30,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDAKOTA FAMILY SERVICES — $30,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetUNITED WAY OF GRAND FORKS EAST GRAND FORKS AND THE AREA INC — $27,667 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetSOURIS VALLEY UNITED WAY — $27,450 over 6y, 1.3% of budgetRape and Abuse Crisis Center of Fargo-Moorhead — $25,100 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetBISMARCK RECREATION COUNCIL — $25,000 over 1y, 7.1% of budgetENHANCING AND STRENGTHENING NORTH DAKOTA NONPROFITS — $25,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetABUSED ADULT RESOURCE CENTER — $22,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCommunity of Care — $21,752 over 7y, 1.7% of budgetWESTERN WELLNESS FOUNDATION INC — $21,000 over 2y, 6.5% of budgetPROJECT BEE — $20,200 over 4y, 0.5% of budgetPRAIRIE HARVEST MENTAL HEALTH — $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetHEARTVIEW FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetUniversity of Mary — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHope Blooms — $19,790 over 7y, 2.6% of budgetBRAVE THE SHAVE — $19,667 over 5y, 1.4% of budgetSOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $18,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetDAKOTA CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER — $17,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetGUARDIAN AND PROTECTIVE SERVICES INC — $16,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetUSPIREND — $15,500 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetShare House Inc — $15,400 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetMINOT AREA RECOVERY COMMUNITY ORGANIZATION — $15,000 over 1y, 27% of budgetTOBACCO FREE NORTH DAKOTA — $15,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFOUNDATION FOR A HEALTHY NORTH DAKOTA — $13,500 over 2y, 0.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds United Way of Cass-Clay ↗
  • Who funds SPECTRA HEALTH ↗
  • Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds Great Plains Food Bank ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI SLOPE AREAWIDE UNITED WAY ↗
  • Who funds North Dakota Autism Center Inc ↗
  • Who funds TNT Kid's Fitness ↗
  • Who funds YWCA CASS CLAY ↗
  • Who funds Dakota Medical Foundation ↗
  • Who funds WOMEN EMPOWERING WOMEN ↗
  • Who funds Missouri Valley Family YMCA ↗
  • Who funds BIO Girls Inc ↗
  • Who funds F5 PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITY HEALTHCARE OF THE DAKOTAS ↗
  • Who funds ANNE CARLSEN CENTER ↗
  • Who funds ESSENTIA HEALTH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Bismarck State College Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Dream Center Bismarck ↗
  • Who funds FIRSTLINK ↗
  • Who funds HERO HEALTHCARE EQUIPMENT RECYCLING ORGANIZATION ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY VOICES OF NORTH DAKOTA INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHLAND HEALTH PARTNERS COMMUNITY HEALTH CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Village Family Service Center ↗
  • Who funds STANDING ROCK COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT ↗
  • Who funds NEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING ↗
  • Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ND ↗

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Barry FoundationMidcontinent Foundati…North Dakota Communit…Fargo-Moorhead Area F…Dakota Medical Founda…Alex Stern Family Fou…Offutt Family Foundat…Sanford Group ReturnImpact FoundationOtto Bremer TrustUnited Way of Cass-Cl…Great Plains Food Bank
The Barry FoundationND161× affinity84 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Barry Foundation · Midcontinent Foundation · North Dakota Community Foundation · Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation · Dakota Medical Foundation · Alex Stern Family Foundation · Offutt Family Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Impact Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · United Way of Cass-Clay · Great Plains Food Bank

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 799 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home