· Public charity
United Way of Cass-Clay
The mission of the Organization is to inspire and activate our community to improve lives.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k7 grants · $48k
- $10k–50k9 grants · $243k
- $50k–250k20 grants · $2.0M
- $250k+4 grants · $1.2M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| Presentation Partners in Housing (PPiH) | $350,039 |
| CAPLP Lakes and Prairies Community Action Partnership Inc | $306,431 |
| YWCA Cass Clay | $269,463 |
| YMCA of the Northern Sky | $250,999 |
| SouthEastern North Dakota Community Action Agency | $230,270 |
| Rape and Abuse Crisis Center | $202,397 |
| Great Plains Food Bank | $158,326 |
| Immigrant Development Center | $157,039 |
| Churches United | $131,442 |
| Youthworks | $116,368 |
| Red River Children's Advocacy Center | $100,632 |
| Moorhead Area Public Schools | $100,099 |
| Afro American Development Association | $95,039 |
| West Fargo Public Schools Agency | $75,318 |
| The Village Family Service Center | $75,293 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $9.5M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +37% since the first grant, against +12% for the ones you funded once.
67 repeat relationships — 35 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $64k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- YOYMCA of the Northern Sky8× · 2017–2024 · $2.3M · revenue +69%
- YCYWCA CASS CLAY8× · 2017–2024 · $2.2M · revenue +95%
- RARape and Abuse Crisis Center of Fargo-Moorhead8× · 2017–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +135%
Funded once
- GSGIRL SCOUTS - DAKOTA HORIZONSone grant, 2017 · $15k · revenue +9%
- LALake Agassiz Habitat for Humanitygraduatedone grant, 2017 · $11k · revenue +45%
- CCCASS COUNTY GOVERNMENTone grant, 2018 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Seeking to build a stronger, more caring community by forming partnerships with businesses, community experts, education & health & human service agencies to achieve targeted outcomes & sustained changes in community conditions which will…
United way of northeastern minnesota invests in nonprofits, programs, and collaborations that equip and empower, creating opportunities for people to thrive in our communities.
At Catholic Charities, we focus our efforts around three core pillars: Food Access, Mental Health and Housing. Guided by our mission - to serve and enhance human dignity for all people - we provide essential services and foster a sense of…
United way of the midlands mission is "we unite our community's caring spirit to build a stronger tomorrow".
Focusing community resources to meet community needs the United Way of Marquette County works to advance the common good by connecting people with health and human care issues they are concerned about and to provide the oversight the…
To strengthen the capacity of individuals and families to improve their quality of life.
Easter Seals Goodwill ND, Inc. is a leading organization in supporting children, adults, and families to have equal opportunities to live, learn, work, and play in their communities.
The tulsa area united way unites people and resources to improve lives and strengthen our communities.
The mission of the Organization is to inspire and activate our community to improve lives.
United way connects people and resources to improve the quality of life in the midlands. united way invests in a broad range of community programs that increase access to health care, improve student success, assist people in crisis to…
Norfolk area united way is committed to building a stronger, healthier, and compassionate community by uniting people and resources to develop or expand human service programs.
Family Pathways works alongside people to enhance lives through a continuum of essential services and, together with community, champions positive social change.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Greater Twin Cities United Way and the most unlike its peers is Eshara. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 22. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
65 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 65 of the 77 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds YMCA of the Northern Sky ↗
- Who funds YWCA CASS CLAY ↗
- Who funds Rape and Abuse Crisis Center of Fargo-Moorhead ↗
- Who funds LAKES AND PRAIRIES COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds Village Family Service Center ↗
- Who funds Great Plains Food Bank ↗
- Who funds CHURCHES UNITED ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEASTERN NORTH DAKOTA COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY ↗
- Who funds Red River Childrens Advocacy Center ↗
- Who funds SOLUTIONS Behavioral Healthcare Professionals PC ↗
- Who funds Fargo Union Mission ↗
- Who funds MOUNTAIN PLAINS YOUTH WORKS ↗
- Who funds FIRSTLINK ↗
- Who funds AFRO AMERICAN DEVELOPMENT ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds IMMIGRANT DEVELOPMENT CENTER ↗
- Who funds Vocational Training Center Inc ↗
- Who funds CHARISM ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF THE RED RIVER VALLEY ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF ND ↗
- Who funds THE FARGO-MOORHEAD COALITION FOR HOMELESS PERSONS ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds RURAL ENRICHMENT AND COUNSELING ↗
- Who funds TNT Kid's Fitness ↗
- Who funds NEXUS-PATH FAMILY HEALING ↗
- Who funds MISSOURI SLOPE AREAWIDE UNITED WAY ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF MINNESOTA ↗
- Who funds Red River Human Services Foundation ↗
- Who funds Community of Care ↗
- Who funds LEGAL SERVICES OF NORTH DAKOTA ↗
- Who funds REBUILDING TOGETHER FARGO-MOORHEAD AREA INC ↗
- Who funds FRASER LTD ↗
- Who funds JASMIN SERVICES ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Fargo-Moorhead Area Foundation Corporation · Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Dakota Caring Foundation · The Barry Foundation · Otto Bremer Trust · Dakota Medical Foundation · Sanford Group Return · Midcontinent Foundation · North Dakota Community Foundation · Alex Stern Family Foundation · Impact Foundation · Great Plains Food Bank · Dakota Medical Charities
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization United Way of Cass-Clay funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- United Way of Massachusetts Bay Inc — 23% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.