· Private foundation
Wolf Kahn Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k8 grants · $43k
- $10k–50k12 grants · $150k
- $50k–250k1 grant · $62k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VERMONT STUDIO CENTER | $62,000 |
| NXTHVN | $15,000 |
| WOONASQUATUCKET VALLEY COMMUNITY BUILD IN | $15,000 |
| AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND LETTERS | $15,000 |
| FINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC | $15,000 |
| ROSE ART MUSEUM AT BRANDEIS UNIVERSITY | $15,000 |
| SMACK MELLON STUDIOS INC | $15,000 |
| THE SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM MUSEUM AND FOUNDATION | $10,000 |
| PARRISH ART MUSEUM | $10,000 |
| THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION | $10,000 |
| SANDGLASS CENTER FOR PUPPETRY AND THEATER | $10,000 |
| TRIANGLE ARTS ASSOCIATION | $10,000 |
| ART21 INC | $10,000 |
| IN-SIGHT PHOTOGRAPY PROJECT | $7,500 |
| THE CURRENT | $7,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY18–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 77% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +21% since the first grant, against -3% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2024, 17 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 72% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $71k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- NYNEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN3× · 2020–2022 · $205k · revenue +42%
- VSVERMONT STUDIO CENTER INC5× · 2019–2024 · $192k · revenue +112%
- BMBRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC5× · 2019–2023 · $146k · revenue +153%
Funded once
- EMEMILY MASON AND ALICE TRUMBULL MASON FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $3.7M · revenue -65% · 83% of their budget
- THTHE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INCone grant, 2022 · $200k · revenue -20%
- TETHE ELIZABETH FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTSone grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -7%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Munson-williams-proctor arts institute (mwpai) is a fine arts center dedicated to serving diverse audiences by advancing the appreciation, understanding, and enjoyment of the arts. the art institute aims to promote interest and…
A center for exhibitions, information, and documentation about living artists since 1977, which continues to be a place of experimentation and a hub of new art and new ideas.
The new york academy of art is a unique graduate school that combines intensive technical training in the fine arts with active critical discourse. we believe that rigorously trained artists are best able to realize their artistic vision.…
art education
To provide a vibrant, contemporary cultural center through arts education, exhibitions and community outreach that will inspire creativity and enhance people's lives
As one of New Englands leading visual and performing arts institutions, SVAC's mission is to promote and nurture the arts.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is International Print Center New York and the most unlike its peers is Emily Mason and Alice Trumbull Mason Foundation Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 18. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 19% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 10% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
53 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 53 of the 84 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds EMILY MASON AND ALICE TRUMBULL MASON FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK BOTANICAL GARDEN ↗
- Who funds THE HUNTER COLLEGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds VERMONT STUDIO CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds BRATTLEBORO MUSEUM & ART CENTERINC ↗
- Who funds THE ELIZABETH FOUNDATION FOR THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL PRINT CENTER NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds FINE ARTS WORK CENTER IN PROVINCETOWN INC ↗
- Who funds PAINTING CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds THE CURRENT INC ↗
- Who funds IN-SIGHT PHOTOGRAPHY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NXTHVN INC ↗
- Who funds SMITHSONIAN INSTITUTION ↗
- Who funds The Laundromat Project Inc ↗
- Who funds HILLTOP MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC ↗
- Who funds STUDIO MONTCLAIR INC ↗
- Who funds THE NEW ENGLAND YOUTH THEATER INC ↗
- Who funds THE PHILLIPS COLLECTION ↗
- Who funds ART21 INC ↗
- Who funds ALLIANCE FOR YOUNG ARTISTS AND WRITERS INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK STUDIO SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN ACADEMY OF ARTS AND LETTERS ↗
- Who funds SMACK MELLON STUDIOS INC ↗
- Who funds WOONASQUATUCKET VALLEY COMMUNITY BUILD INC ↗
- Who funds THE PARRISH ART MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds BRUCE MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds HIGH MOWING SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds THEATRE ADVENTURE INC ↗
- Who funds BENNINGTON MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds CENTER FOR ART LAW INC ↗
- Who funds THE HATCH INC ↗
- Who funds 20 Summers Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Vermont Council on the Arts Inc · The Vermont Community Foundation · The Windham Foundation Inc · Milton and Sally Avery Arts Foundation · Ben & Jerry's Foundation Inc · Robert Lehman Foundation Inc · Thomas Thompson Trust · Helen Frankenthaler Foundation Inc · The Bay and Paul Foundations Inc · New England Foundation for the Arts Incorporated · Hillman Family Foundations · Vermont Humanities Council
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Wolf Kahn Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vermont Folklife Center — 90% of income from government
- Fine Arts Work Center in Provincetown Inc — 27% of income from government
- Vermont Council On the Arts Inc — 20% of income from government
- Hilltop Montessori School Inc — 5% of income from government
- 20 Summers Inc — 2% of income from government
- Old Dartmouth Historical Society — 2% of income from government
- Vermont Studio Center Inc — 2% of income from government
- Portland Art Museum — 1% of income from government
- Brattleboro Museum & Art Centerinc — 1% of income from government
- Landmark College Inc — 1% of income from government
- Nxthvn Inc — 1% of income from government
- Bruce Museum Inc — 0% of income from government
- Theatre Adventure Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Wolf Kahn Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to Wolf Kahn Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.