Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

Reissa Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$2.8M
Granted FY2024still arriving
98
Grants FY2024still arriving
8
States reached
$525k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.

Philanthropy$3.5MHuman Services$2.0MCrime & Legal$2.0MHousing & Shelter$1.8MEducation$1.6MCivil Rights$989kArts & Culture$868kYouth Development$505kOther$0
02FY2024 · 98 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k35 grants · $126k
  • $10k–50k48 grants · $1.0M
  • $50k–250k14 grants · $1.1M
  • $250k+1 grant · $525k
$15,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$66M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$525,000
YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE$200,000
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC$150,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$150,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS$75,000
CHILDREN NOW$75,000
CHILDRENS LAW CENTER OF CALIFORNIA$50,000
LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY$50,000
TEXAS NETWORK OF YOUTH SERVICES INCORPORATED$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$50,000
THE UCLA FOUNDATION$50,000
SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS$50,000
CASA OF LOS ANGELES$50,000
FOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS$50,000
OUR LADY QUEEN OF ANGELS HOUSING ALLIANCE$50,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $2.8M) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 45% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants spread fairly evenly across need levels.

area typical 11%KINGDOM WORKS: $25k → 16%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $50k → 17%CHILDREN NOW: $100k → 10%INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $50k → 17%FOSTERING HOPE AUSTIN: $20k → 6%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $75k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $50k → 10%BLACK BEING: $20k → 14%CHILDREN NOW: $50k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $50k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $50k → 10%FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH: $50k → 10%CHILDREN NOW: $75k → 10%TEXAS CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES: $40k → 10%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $100k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $100k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $60k → 14%TEXAS CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES: $20k → 10%TEXAS CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES: $20k → 10%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $200k → 10%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $100k → 10%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $50k → 10%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $30k → 10%YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE: $20k → 10%POP-UP BIRTHDAY FOUNDATION: $100k → 10%POP-UP BIRTHDAY FOUNDATION: $50k → 10%POP-UP BIRTHDAY FOUNDATION: $30k → 10%POP-UP BIRTHDAY FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%TEXAS NETWORK OF YOUTH SERVICES INCORPORATED: $30k → 10%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF THE SOUTH INC: $30k → 10%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF THE SOUTH INC: $30k → 10%SEED HOUSE PROJECT: $35k → 14%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF THE SOUTH INC: $30k → 10%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF THE SOUTH INC: $30k → 10%LUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICE OF THE SOUTH INC: $30k → 10%CHILDRENS INSTITUTE INC: $50k → 14%BUTTERFLYS HAVEN: $50k → 14%JOVENES INC: $50k → 14%BUTTERFLYS HAVEN: $25k → 14%JOVENES INC: $50k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $50k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $50k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $50k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $50k → 14%UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN: $25k → 14%CHILDRENS BUREAU OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $50k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $40k → 14%IMAGINE LOS ANGELES INC: $50k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
OR
NV
PA
CA
CO
VA
DC
GA
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

04

Where the work is directed

The same grants, placed two ways — where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose earmarks the money.

About 9% of Reissa Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked, by their stated purpose, for a different county than the recipient’s own address — money that lands at a nonprofit in one place but is meant to do its work in another.

Reissa Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address

Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the foundation’s own 990 grant descriptions.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

92%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$12M · 113 repeat orgs$1.1M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +39% since the first grant, against +10% for the ones you funded once.

113 repeat relationships — 58 still active in FY2024, 55 since wound down; 21 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

113
41

Total granted

$12M
$780k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%
+10%

Still filing today

76%
83%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $301k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesEducationArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentCommunity ImprovementPhilanthropyOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS
    5× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +301%
  • EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $699k · revenue +37%
  • YA
    YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE
    5× · 2020–2024 · $400k · revenue +49%

Funded once

  • GN
    Guadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation
    one grant, 2023 · $100k · revenue -17%
  • CHILDREN'S INSTITUTE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $50k · revenue +25%
  • CI
    CAPITAL IMPACT PARTNERSgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +66%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
California Forward

Ca fwd drives action to identify solutions that can be taken to scale to meet the challenges the state is facing. the organization is driven by the belief that regional solutions across the state will help ensure economic, environmental,…

Public Benefit
2
California Alliance of Caregivers

California Alliance of Caregivers represents the voices of relative and non-relative caregivers to promote the well-being of children in foster care. California Alliance of Caregivers provides training information support and advocacy for…

Health
3
Youth Policy Institute Inc

Youth policy institute (ypi) transforms los angeles neighborhoods, reducing poverty by offering cradle to college & career services.

—
4
California Donor Table

California Donor Table anchors a hub of donors, foundations, and community leaders. We pool together our resources to shape California into a truly democratic state that works for the people, not the powerful. Rooted in our commitment to…

Civil Rights
5
San Francisco Casa

San Francisco CASA transforms the lives of children and youth traumatized and displaced in the foster care and related systems by providing one consistent, caring volunteer advocate, trained to address each childs needs in the court and…

Civil Rights
6
Los Angeles Conservation Corps

The la conservation corps creates equitable opportunities for young people to build resilience in themselves, their communities and the environment through a program of work, education and support.

Employment
7
California Court Appointed Special Advocate Association

California casa was founded in 1987. its mission is to ensure that children and youth in the child welfare and juvenile justice systems have both a voice and the services they need to thrive. we achieve this by strengthening and empowering…

Civil Rights
8
Cangress Dba Los Angeles Community Action Network

Community organizing, education, advocacy, leadership development, direct services and organizational development for communities faced with immense poverty.

Community Improvement
9
Los Angeles Youth Network

Youth Emerging Stronger (YES) empowers young people, between ages of 12 and 24 within Los Angeles County, including but not limited to run-away and homeless youth. YES mission is to end homelessness one youth at a time to become…

Human Services
10
Catalyst Family Inc

At catalyst family, inc., we believe that strong families build strong communities. we are committed to nurturing vibrant communities where children thrive and families succeed, creating lasting change.

Education
11
La Forward Institute

Transform local communities into places that are fair and flourishing for everyone through education, community organization, and coalition-building.

Civil Rights
12
Alternatives Inc

Alternatives, inc.'s mission is to facilitate personal development,strengthen family relationships and enhance the community's well being. serving over 3,000 youth and families annually, the organization offers a range of counseling and…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Institute Inc and the most unlike its peers is Polos Pantry. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyCommunity FoundationsAffordable Housing Developm…Community Arts CentersOrchestra and Ensemble Perf…Affordable Housing Construc…Environmental Conservation …Food Banks and PantriesPregnancy Support ServicesAddiction Recovery ServicesIndependent K-12 SchoolsSenior Support ServicesLocal Food System Organizat…Cancer Support ServicesHealth Access Advocacy and …Faith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community FoundationsDomestic Violence ServicesYouth Development ServicesYouth Mentoring ProgramsWomen & Girls Leadership De…Policy Research and AdvocacyChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 15 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number25%7%<5yr16%25%5–10yr19%25%10–20yr17%18%20–35yr11%17%35–55yr12%9%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value25%2%<5yr16%11%5–10yr19%16%10–20yr17%20%20–35yr11%36%35–55yr12%15%55yr+

The field is 25% startups (under 5 years old) — 7% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 1% lost their exemption, against 15% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
1%2/177
the rest of the field
15%
13,281/89,180

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

155 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 155 of the 185 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
33
Early backer (in before they grew)
146/155
Grantees still filing
107/155
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

YOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE — $400,000 · Human ServicesYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCEFOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS — $400,000 · Human ServicesFOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIO…Imagine Los Angeles Inc — $350,000 · Human ServicesImagine Los Angeles IncCHILDREN NOW — $325,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN NOWPop-Up Birthday Foundation — $225,000 · Human ServicesPop-Up Birthday Foundatio…UNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN — $225,000 · Human ServicesUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHI…FIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $175,000 · Human ServicesLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC — $150,000 · Human ServicesTexas Network of Youth Services Inc — $120,000 · Human Services+32 more — $1,083,500 · Human Services+32 moreCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $1,395,000 · OtherCHICAGO COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF CALIFORNIA — $275,000 · OtherLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY - LOYOLA LAW SCHOOL — $215,000 · OtherW HAYWOOD BURNS INSTITUTE — $220,000 · Other+97 more — $3,211,614 · Other+97 moreUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $979,950 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF S…SOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $299,000 · EducationSOCIAL GOOD FUN…UCLA FOUNDATION — $150,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATIONFOTC - LOS ANGELES — $140,000 · EducationFOTC - LOS ANGE…TEXAS TRIBUNE INC — $125,000 · EducationTEXAS TRIBUNE I…LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · EducationREADY TO SUCCEED — $95,000 · EducationFriends of Auckland University of Technology — $90,000 · Education+5 more — $60,250 · EducationSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $1,275,100 · PhilanthropySOUTHERN CALIF…I LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE — $225,000 · PhilanthropyI LIVE HERE I …PHILANTHROPY SOUTHWEST — $71,600 · Philanthropy+10 more — $321,450 · Philanthropy+10 moreEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $699,000 · Crime & LegalVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC — $140,000 · Crime & LegalINITIATE JUSTICE — $75,000 · Crime & LegalTexans Care For Children Inc — $50,000 · Crime & Legal+2 more — $50,000 · Crime & LegalCASA OF LOS ANGELES — $275,000 · Civil RightsTEXAS CASA INC — $115,000 · Civil RightsALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $100,000 · Civil RightsBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $100,000 · Civil RightsCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND — $80,000 · Civil RightsCAPITAL OF TEXAS MEDIA FOUNDATION — $50,000 · Civil RightsFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC — $250,000 · Housing & ShelterLos Angeles Room & Board — $175,000 · Housing & ShelterSOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE — $140,000 · Housing & ShelterHousingWorks Austin — $50,000 · Housing & ShelterCentral Texas Table of Grace Inc — $50,000 · Housing & Shelter
Human Services$3,453,500Other$5,316,614Education$2,039,200Philanthropy$1,893,150Crime & Legal$1,014,000Civil Rights$720,000Housing & Shelter$665,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUTHERN CALIFORNIA GRANTMAKERS — $1,275,100 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $979,950 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC — $699,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetYOUTH AND FAMILY ALLIANCE — $400,000 over 5y, 0.8% of budgetFOSTERING MEDIA CONNECTIONS — $400,000 over 5y, 6.3% of budgetImagine Los Angeles Inc — $350,000 over 5y, 5.8% of budgetCHILDREN NOW — $325,000 over 5y, 1.5% of budgetSOCIAL GOOD FUND INC — $299,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCASA OF LOS ANGELES — $275,000 over 5y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S LAW CENTER OF CALIFORNIA — $275,000 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFOUNDATION COMMUNITIES INC — $250,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPop-Up Birthday Foundation — $225,000 over 5y, 26% of budgetI LIVE HERE I GIVE HERE — $225,000 over 5y, 4.2% of budgetUNITED FRIENDS OF THE CHILDREN — $225,000 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetW HAYWOOD BURNS INSTITUTE — $220,000 over 3y, 1.8% of budgetFIRST PLACE FOR YOUTH — $175,000 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetLos Angeles Room & Board — $175,000 over 3y, 13% of budgetLos Angeles Metropolitan Churches — $175,000 over 3y, 8.6% of budgetLUTHERAN SOCIAL SERVICES OF THE SOUTH INC — $150,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $150,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVERA INSTITUTE OF JUSTICE INC — $140,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOCIAL JUSTICE LEARNING INSTITUTE — $140,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetFOTC - LOS ANGELES — $140,000 over 3y, 3.9% of budgetTEXAS TRIBUNE INC — $125,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetTexas Network of Youth Services Inc — $120,000 over 4y, 4.0% of budgetBLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS — $115,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetTEXAS CASA INC — $115,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetCalifornia Youth Connection — $110,000 over 5y, 1.0% of budgetPARTNERSHIPS FOR CHILDREN — $106,000 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetSUPRSEED Inc — $105,000 over 5y, 23% of budgetLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY — $100,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJOVENES INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetALLIANCE FOR YOUTH ORGANIZING — $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetGuadalupe Neighborhood Development Corporation — $100,000 over 1y, 3.0% of budgetBVM CAPACITY BUILDING INSTITUTE INC — $100,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSeed House Project — $96,500 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetREADY TO SUCCEED — $95,000 over 2y, 6.3% of budgetTEXAS CENTER FOR CHILD AND FAMILY STUDIES — $90,000 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetFIRST NATIONS DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE — $90,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetAUSTIN HABITAT FOR HUMANITY INC — $90,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetFriends of Auckland University of Technology — $90,000 over 3y, 100% of budgetBUTTERFLYS HAVEN FORMERLY KNOWN AS TREEHOUSE IMPACT GROUP — $84,000 over 3y, 14% of budgetALMA BACKYARD FARM — $80,000 over 4y, 1.7% of budgetARTS FOR HEALING AND JUSTICE NETWORK — $80,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S DEFENSE FUND — $80,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFULCRUM ARTS — $78,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetINITIATE JUSTICE — $75,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Conrad N Hilton Found…St David's FoundationThe California Endowm…The Ralph M Parsons F…Liberty Hill Foundati…Weingart FoundationAustin Community Foun…The California Wellne…United Way IncCommunity PartnersThe Rose Hills Founda…
California Community FoundationCA45.5× affinity48 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Conrad N Hilton Foundation · St David's Foundation · The California Endowment · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Liberty Hill Foundation · Weingart Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · The California Wellness Foundation · United Way Inc · Community Partners · The Rose Hills Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Reissa Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%6%25%56%100%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    57report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Reissa Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Reissa Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 185 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines