· Public charity
Pipkin Charitable Foundation
Supporting organization of california community foundation.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k62 grants · $203k
- $10k–50k27 grants · $527k
- $50k–250k13 grants · $1.0M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY | $200,000 |
| BETWEEN HORSES AND HUMANS | $131,000 |
| TEACH FOR AMERICA | $100,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF LAKE TAHOE | $70,500 |
| PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES | $70,000 |
| CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION | $70,000 |
| LAKE TAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $68,000 |
| CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL LOS ANGELES | $64,000 |
| RICHSTONE FAMILY CENTER INC | $60,000 |
| MANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION | $57,000 |
| LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE | $50,000 |
| AMERICAN BATTLEFIELD TRUST | $50,000 |
| ST BERNARD HIGH SCHOOL | $50,000 |
| MBX FOUNDATION | $48,150 |
| YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES | $37,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY22–24, $261k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 98% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +28% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
63 repeat relationships — 57 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 43 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $260k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LMLOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY9× · 2017–2025 · $805k · revenue +68%
- LTLEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE8× · 2017–2025 · $215k · revenue +122%
PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES6× · 2019–2025 · $215k · revenue +71%
Funded once
EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INCone grant, 2022 · $30k · revenue -36%
Save The Children Federation Incone grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue -13%- TSTHE SAFE CITIES FOUNDATION2× · 2022–2025 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
Santa Barbara Education Foundation (SBEF) provides and supports programs that enrich the academic, artistic, and personal development of all students in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.
Guided by the principles of academic rigor and diversity, the international school of san francisco offers programs of study in french and english to prepare its graduates for a world in which the ability to think critically and to…
California ocean science trust (ost) is a non-profit organization dedicated to accelerating progress towards a healthy and productive ocean future for california. created by state legislation, ost bridges the gap between cutting-edge…
The University of California Student Association (UCSA) is a coalition of students and student governments that aims to provide a collective voice for all students through advocacy and direct action. UCSA participates in the shared…
To help each child reach his/her full potential by cultivating an active village of parents, community members, and stakeholders involved in providing an individual, personal, and conceptual learning environment for each student.
We transform schools to revolutionize school systems, empowering all students with a high-quality education. the partnership's goals are to 1) dramatically accelerate achievement for students in the district's highest need and historically…
Build the parent and community demand for world-class public schools, and to accelerate the growth of these schools, particularly for low-income students, students of colors, and students with special needs.
A private school that cultivates and celebrates the intellectual, imaginative, and humanitarian promise of each student in a community that practices mutual respect, embraces diversity, and inspires passion for learning.
Marin academy asks every individual to think, question, and create in an environment of encouragement and compassion, and challenges each person to accept the responsibilities posed by education in a democratic society.
The uc santa barbara foundation actively works to further the goals of the university of california, santa barbara. the foundation seeks to maintain and nurture the university's quality and distinction. on behalf of the campus, the…
The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is California Community Foundation and the most unlike its peers is Kindling Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.9% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
189 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds LOYOLA MARYMOUNT UNIVERSITY ↗
- Who funds Teach for America Inc ↗
- Who funds Portal Schools ↗
- Who funds LEAGUE TO SAVE LAKE TAHOE ↗
- Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds LAKE TAHOE COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds KIPP SOCAL PUBLIC SCHOOLS ↗
- Who funds Boys & Girls Club of Lake Tahoe ↗
- Who funds MANHATTAN BEACH EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds American Battlefield Trust ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Between Horses and Humans ↗
- Who funds THE RICHSTONE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds Da Vinci Schools Fund ↗
- Who funds El Dorado Community Foundation ↗
- Who funds California YMCA Youth & Gvt ↗
- Who funds Tahoe Area Mountain Biking Association ↗
- Who funds Young Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles ↗
- Who funds ECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Fixn Fidos Inc ↗
- Who funds ODA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MBX FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Lake Tahoe Wildlife Care Inc ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA SCIENCE CENTER FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES COUNTY MUSEUM OF NATURAL HISTORY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds LULU & LEO FUND ↗
- Who funds MY CHOSEN VESSELS INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF MONTEVALLO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds WISEBURN EDUCATION FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
- Who funds GROWINGGREAT ↗
- Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
- Who funds Diabetes Camping & Education Services ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA CHARTER SCHOOLS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds WILDLAND FIREFIGHTER FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · El Dorado Community Foundation · The Crail-Johnson Foundation · The Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation · Skechers Foundation · Tahoe Community Foundation · Joseph Drown Foundation · Great Public Schools Now · Lake Tahoe Kiwanis Club Foundation · The John H & Cynthia Lee Smet Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Pipkin Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Save the Children Federation Inc — 30% of income from government
- National Fallen Firefighters Foundation — 24% of income from government
- City Year Inc — 11% of income from government
- Impact Melanoma Inc — 3% of income from government
- Chill Foundation — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Pipkin Charitable Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Pipkin Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.