Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation DossiersAlso receives grants — funding profile →
Plinth

· Public charity

Onelegacy Foundation

To save and heal lives by inspiring and advancing donation and transplantation through research, public education and honoring donors whose legacies live on.

$208k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$116k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0199% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2024.

Health$10MEducation$2.0MCivil Rights$690kHuman Services$658kScience & Tech$488kRecreation & Sports$325kPhilanthropy$160kYouth Development$130kOther$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $8k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $35k
  • $50k–250k2 grants · $166k
$50,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$30M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
COMFORT ZONE CAMP$116,000
AVA'S HEART FOUNDATION$50,000
UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO$34,529
HALACHIC ORGAN DONOR SOCIETY$7,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $674k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE UNFORGETTABLES FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $116k → 9%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $94k → 22%ORANGE COUNTY PROFESSIONAL FIREFIGHTERS EVENT: $6k → 10%THE UNFORGETTABLES FOUNDATION: $10k → 14%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $102k → 9%COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $90k → 22%COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC: $80k → 22%FIESTA EDUCATIVA INC: $10k → 14%YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF METROPLITAN LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%COMFORT ZONE CAMP: $116k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%KETCHUM DOWNTOWN YMCA: $10k → 14%YMCA OF METROPOLITAN LOS ANGELES: $10k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

IL
NY
IA
OH
CA
CO
VA
NC
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

45%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$6.5M · 30 repeat orgs$7.8M to everyone else

30 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2024, 27 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

30
29

Total granted

$6.5M
$7.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+18%
+35%

Still filing today

73%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $35k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthHuman ServicesPhilanthropyCommunity ImprovementYouth DevelopmentRecreation & SportsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CZ
    COMFORT ZONE CAMP INC
    6× · 2017–2024 · $598k · revenue +55%
  • CEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER
    3× · 2019–2022 · $474k · revenue +50%
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    4× · 2018–2023 · $170k · revenue +27%

Funded once

  • O
    ONELEGACYgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $7.0M · revenue +35%
  • PT
    Pasadena Tournament of Roses Association
    one grant, 2023 · $195k · revenue +9%
  • PT
    PASADENA TOURNAMENT OF ROSES FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $115k · revenue -9% · 31% of their budget

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Pasadena Hospital Association Ltd

Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…

Health
2
Los Angeles Medical Center Foundation
Health
3
Usc Arcadia Hospital Foundation

Mission statement the mission of usc arcadia hospital foundation educates and inspires the community to generously support quality medical care at usc arcadia hospital.

Health
4
Usc Health System

The Corporation is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. The Corporation is…

Health
5
California Institute for Immunology and Immunotherapy

To harness the power of the human immune system and advanced computing technologies to create and translate scientific discoveries into next generation vaccines and therapies for prevention, control and cure of chronic diseases, enabling…

Health
6
Children's Hospital & Research Center At Oakland

The mission of children's hospital & research center at oakland is to protect and advance the health and well-being of children through clinical care, teaching and research.

Health
7
Sutter Bay Hospitals

MISSION STATEMENT: MISSION: CARING FOR OUR PATIENTS FIRST AND OUR PEOPLE ALWAYS. VISION: TO BE THE MOST COMPREHENSIVE, INTEGRATED AND CONNECTED HEALTH SYSTEM FOR GETTING AND STAYING WELL. VALUES: EXCELLENCE - We deliver high-quality,…

Health
8
Children's Hospital Los Angeles Medical Group

To be the preeminent pediatric, multispecialty medical group in the nation, dedicated to providing the highest quality medical care to infants, children and adolescents; and supporting the finest teaching and research endeavors of our…

—
9
Usc Care Medical Group Inc

To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…

Health
10
Ucsf Health Community Hospitals Fka Saint Francis Memorial Hospital

Ucsf health community hospital's mission statement is caring, healing, teaching, and discovering.

Health
11
California Health Foundation and Trust

Support access, research, and education in the fields of healthcare delivery, financing, and patient care.

Philanthropy
12
California Institute for BioMedical Research

Our mission is to build a unique institute that bridges basic research and drug discovery, and that attracts the best and brightest scientists, physicians and students to work together synergistically to find cures for neglected human…

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Greater Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is Terasaki Inst for Biomedical Innovation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

Your grantees are a median of 36 years old; the field is 13. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number24%4%<5yr15%2%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr18%29%20–35yr10%24%35–55yr12%31%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value24%0%<5yr15%1%5–10yr20%9%10–20yr18%61%20–35yr10%3%35–55yr12%26%55yr+

The field is 24% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 3% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
3%2/62
the rest of the field
14%
13,497/93,252

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

45 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 45 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
41/45
Grantees still filing
30/45
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

ONELEGACY — $7,037,566 · HealthONELEGACYCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $473,580 · HealthCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER+16 more — $825,175 · Health+16 moreREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY OF CALIFORNIA — $1,160,235 · OtherREGENTS OF THE UNIVERSITY O…CROWD ADVOCACY — $680,190 · OtherCROWD ADVOCACYREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIA — $658,475 · OtherREGENTS UNIV OF CALIFORNIAMAV12 LLC — $360,000 · OtherMAV12 LLC+24 more — $733,265 · Other+24 moreAva's Heart — $993,500 · PhilanthropyTHE MOLLY STEINSAPIR FOUNDATION — $80,000 · Philanthropy+1 more — $22,000 · PhilanthropyCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC — $597,800 · Human ServicesYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $40,000 · Human Services+3 more — $36,000 · Human ServicesUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $508,265 · EducationCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $58,172 · EducationUCLA FOUNDATION — $20,000 · Education+1 more — $10,000 · EducationPasadena Tournament of Roses Association — $195,000 · Recreation & SportsTRANSPLANT GAMES TEAM SOUTHERN CALIF INC — $140,000 · Recreation & SportsTHE PAINTED TURTLE — $120,000 · Youth DevelopmentThe Coalition For At-Risk Youth — $10,000 · Youth Development
Health$8,336,321Other$3,592,165Philanthropy$1,095,500Human Services$673,800Education$596,437Recreation & Sports$335,000Youth Development$130,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetONELEGACY — $7,037,566 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetAva's Heart — $993,500 over 8y, 65% of budgetCOMFORT ZONE CAMP INC — $597,800 over 6y, 6.2% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA — $508,265 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCEDARS-SINAI MEDICAL CENTER — $473,580 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPasadena Tournament of Roses Association — $195,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles — $169,894 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL INSTITUTE OF TRANSPLANTATION FOUNDATION — $160,000 over 2y, 12% of budgetTRANSPLANT GAMES TEAM SOUTHERN CALIF INC — $140,000 over 4y, 26% of budgetTHE PAINTED TURTLE — $120,000 over 4y, 0.8% of budgetPASADENA TOURNAMENT OF ROSES FOUNDATION — $115,000 over 1y, 31% of budgetLifeStream Blood Bank — $110,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CLEVELAND CLINIC FOUNDATION — $98,321 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MOLLY STEINSAPIR FOUNDATION — $80,000 over 2y, 84% of budgetTERASAKI INST FOR BIOMEDICAL INNOVATION — $75,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetRENAL SUPPORT NETWORK — $70,000 over 4y, 3.6% of budgetNational Kidney Foundation Inc — $65,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY — $58,172 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES — $45,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetYoung Men's Christian Association of Metropolitan Los Angeles — $40,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetJJs Legacy — $30,460 over 5y, 2.6% of budgetAmerican Liver Foundation — $27,500 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNFORGETTABLES FOUNDATION — $20,000 over 2y, 2.7% of budgetHanson House Foundation Inc — $16,500 over 3y, 2.3% of budgetLA PLAZA DE CULTURA Y ARTES — $15,150 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetLIVER HEALTH FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 6.1% of budgetThe Halachic Organ Donor Society Inc DBA Ematai — $15,000 over 2y, 1.2% of budgetPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetThe Coalition For At-Risk Youth — $10,000 over 1y, 12% of budgetUNITED CEREBRAL PALSY ASSOC OF OC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL HEALTH FOUNDATION — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFIESTA EDUCATIVA INC — $10,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetGreater LA African Amer Chamb of Commerce — $10,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetFRIENDS OF MARQUEZ — $10,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCONGRESS OF RACIAL EQUALITY OF CALIFORNIA CORE-CA — $10,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetLOS ANGELES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCALIFORNIA HOSPITAL MEDICAL CENTER FOUNDATION — $7,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFallen Firefighters Relief Fund — $6,000 over 1y, 4.0% of budgetCHOC FOUNDATION — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

California Community …Children's Hospital L…Cedars-Sinai Medical …The Ralph M Parsons F…Weingart FoundationThe Annenberg Foundat…Altamed Health Servic…QueensCareSempra FoundationNational Philanthropi…The Bank of America C…Morgan Stanley Global…
California Community FoundationCA18.4× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: California Community Foundation · Children's Hospital Los Angeles · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Weingart Foundation · The Annenberg Foundation · Altamed Health Services Corporation · QueensCare · Sempra Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization Onelegacy Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Onelegacy Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Onelegacy Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 62 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home
    State money flows
    the interactive map of money crossing state lines