· Public charity
Children's Hospital Los Angeles
Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k4 grants · $29k
- $10k–50k17 grants · $290k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $250k
- $250k+3 grants · $5.3M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| California Health Foundation | $4,334,901 |
| Ronald McDonald House Charities of Southern California | $500,000 |
| Los Angeles Kings Hockey Club LP | $447,602 |
| ALTAMED FOUNDATION | $125,000 |
| NATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC | $125,000 |
| LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY GARDEN COUNCIL | $35,600 |
| THE UCLA FOUNDATION | $25,500 |
| Hollywood Food Coalition | $25,000 |
| LOS ANGELES CITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $25,000 |
| BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO LOS ANGELES | $22,700 |
| NATIONAL FORUM FOR LATINO HEALTHCARE EXE | $20,000 |
| WOMEN IN HEALTH ADMINISTRATION | $16,240 |
| PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION INC | $15,000 |
| GREATER LOS ANGELES AFRICAN AMERICAN | $15,000 |
| LOS ANGELES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE | $15,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $43k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against +9% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 13 still active in FY2025, 12 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $255k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- RMRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA9× · 2017–2025 · $4.0M · revenue +17%
NATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC9× · 2017–2025 · $1.4M · revenue +20%- PIPARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION6× · 2019–2025 · $173k · revenue +304%
Funded once
- TCTHE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIAgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $85k · revenue +59%
- PSPLAYFLY SPORTS PROPERTIES LLCone grant, 2022 · $50k
- CSCANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY LOS ANGELESone grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -14%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Promotion and advancement of children's health through patient care, research, and education.
To enhance the professionalism and clinical autonomy of physicians to allow them to advocate for their patients and the health of the community of los angeles.
To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.
To promote health by engaging in the practice of medicine for patients of hospitals affiliated with the university of southern california keck school of medicine and elsewhere. to provide medical care to the sick and injured who may come…
The Corporation is a nonprofit public benefit corporation and is not organized for the private gain of any person. It is organized under the Nonprofit Public Benefit Corporation Law for public and charitable purposes. The Corporation is…
Our children's hospital foundation is dedicated to supporting loma linda university children's hospital's mission to bring whole-child healthcare to the region and beyond.
Huntington Health stands for community. We stand for compassion. But more than anything, Huntington stands for health. Providing world-class health care is our specialty, and it's what we've been doing for the San Gabriel Valley since…
Membership organization providing services to member hospitals including education and representation before legislative and regulatory bodies.
The association serves its members by creating resources that enable california school administrators to develop and apply creative leadership and management skills and in turn, improve the educational process for all students.
The foundation's mission is to improve the oral health of all californians by supporting the dental profession and its efforts to meet community needs.
To be the preeminent pediatric, multispecialty medical group in the nation, dedicated to providing the highest quality medical care to infants, children and adolescents; and supporting the finest teaching and research endeavors of our…
The central mission of the university of southern california is the development of human beings and society as a whole through the cultivation and enrichment of the human mind and spirit. the principal means by which our mission is…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Greater Los Angeles and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 42 years old; the field is 14. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
58 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 58 of the 64 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds CALIFORNIA HEALTH FOUNDATION AND TRUST ↗
- Who funds RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE CHARITIES OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL MEDICAL FELLOWSHIPS INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS IN CARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds UCLA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ALTAMED FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FORUM FOR LATINO HEALTH CARE EXECUTIVES ↗
- Who funds THE CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF PHILADELPHIA ↗
- Who funds HATHAWAY-SYCAMORES CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES ↗
- Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
- Who funds MARCH OF DIMES INC ↗
- Who funds Greater LA African Amer Chamb of Commerce ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES CITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FRIENDS OF THE LOS ANGELES FREE CLINIC ↗
- Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION COUNCIL OF GREATER LA ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES AREA CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds HOLLYWOOD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF METRO LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF GREATER LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds ALTAMED HEALTH SERVICES CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds LOS ANGELES COMMUNITY GARDEN COUNCIL ↗
- Who funds VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL ↗
- Who funds HOLLYWOOD CHAMBER OF COMMERCE ↗
- Who funds CANCER SUPPORT COMMUNITY LOS ANGELES ↗
- Who funds HOLLYWOOD FOOD COALITION ↗
- Who funds The Conference Board Inc ↗
- Who funds HAWAII COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CALIFORNIA STATE UNIVERSITY DOMINGUEZ HILLS PHILANTHROPIC FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PATIENT CARE FOUNDATION OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY ↗
- Who funds EAST LOS ANGELES COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds VALLEY PRESBYTERIAN HOSPITAL FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Nicole Parker Foundation for Children ↗
- Who funds UNITE-LA INC ↗
- Who funds UC SANTA BARBARA FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · California Community Foundation · The California Endowment · Cedars-Sinai Medical Center · Weingart Foundation · Unihealth Foundation · The Ahmanson Foundation · Altamed Health Services Corporation · The Annenberg Foundation · California Healthcare Foundation · Kaiser Foundation Hospitals · Onelegacy Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization Children's Hospital Los Angeles funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Epilepsy Foundation of America — 22% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.