Skip to content
Norman M Kronick Fort Worth Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

Norman M Kronick Fort Worth Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.2M
Granted FY2024still arriving
44
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$500k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Housing & Shelter$6.4MFood & Nutrition$1.9MHuman Services$1.4MHealth$881kReligion$225kEducation$60kYouth Development$25kInternational$10kOther$0
02FY2024 · 44 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k18 grants · $362k
  • $50k–250k20 grants · $1.8M
  • $250k+3 grants · $1.0M
$50,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$78M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Fort Worth Housing Solutions$500,000
Recovery Resource Council$250,000
Tarrant Area Food Bank$250,000
Presbyterian Night Shelter$215,000
The Heights Ellis Co Family Resourc$200,000
Tarrant County Hands of Hope$110,000
Christs Haven for Children$110,000
Community Caring Center$100,000
Cindy Ramsey Center$100,000
Arlington Life Shelter$100,000
Freedom House$100,000
Catholic Charities Forth Worth$100,000
Arlington Urban Ministries$100,000
Harvesting in Mansfield Food Bank$75,000
TRAC$75,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–24, $933k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Freedom House: $100k → 8%Gladney Center for Adoption: $10k → 11%Parker County Center of Hope: $50k → 8%Gladney Center for Adoption: $10k → 11%Parker County Center of Hope: $30k → 8%GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $3k → 11%CITY SQUARE: $100k → 14%Fort Worth HOPE Center: $50k → 11%FORT WORTH HOPE CENTER: $50k → 11%Fort Worth HOPE Center: $25k → 11%Hope Supply Co: $10k → 14%Hope Supply Co: $10k → 14%HOPE SUPPLY CO: $5k → 14%6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: $15k → 11%United Community Centers Inc: $25k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $50k → 11%SafeHaven of Tarrant County: $30k → 11%Mission Central Metroplex: $50k → 11%MISSION CENTRAL MTTROPLEX: $45k → 11%6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: $15k → 11%COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER: $30k → 11%Community Enrichment Center: $15k → 11%Northside Inter-Community Agency: $25k → 11%Northside Inter Community Agenc: $10k → 11%Tarrant County Hands of Hope: $110k → 11%WestAid: $25k → 11%WestAid: $20k → 11%WEST AID: $15k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

78%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$8.6M · 26 repeat orgs$2.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +9% since the first grant, against -12% for those funded once.

26 repeat relationships: 24 still active in FY2024, 2 since wound down; 20 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
22

Total granted

$8.6M
$842k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+9%
-12%

Still filing today

88%
36%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 51% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.6M went to new ones.

50%100%’19’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesFood & NutritionReligionHealthHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TP
    THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY
    5× · 2019–2024 · $4.5M · revenue +41%
  • TA
    Tarrant Area Food Bank
    4× · 2021–2024 · $1.2M · revenue +9%
  • RR
    Recovery Resource Council
    3× · 2022–2024 · $630k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • NT
    NORTH TX COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $250k
  • C
    CITYSQUARE
    one grant, 2022 · $100k · revenue -56%
  • GO
    GOODWILL OF N CENTRAL TX
    one grant, 2022 · $54k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Restoration Center

Restoration Centers mission is to minister to the physical and spiritual needs of individuals in the community of west Fort Worth. Restoration Center provides food clothes and other necessities to people in need.

Religion
2
Eastside Ministries of Ft Worth

As a 501 (c) 3 organization that was incorporated in 1981 to provide free food and clothing to unhoused and underserved individuals and families on the east side of Fort Worth without discrimination.

Human Services
3
Housing Opportunities of Fort Worth

Housing counseling services.

—
4
Katy Christian Ministries

See Schedule O.Katy Christian Ministries (KCM) is a social service non-profit that serves the Katy/West Houston area. KCM's Social Service Department offers emergency financial assistance, a Food Pantry, a Crisis Center that houses the…

Human Services
5
Hearts Full of Love

to share Jesus with those we minister to regardless of social status by first meeting their physical needs and, through that relationship, meeting their spiritual needs.

Human Services
6
Target Hunger Inc

The mission of Target Hunger is to alleviate hunger and its root causes in the Houston neighborhoods we serve. Target Hunger is on the front lines of hunger every day through its food distribution system that includes multiple food…

Human Services
7
North Dallas Food Pantry

North Dallas Food Pantry (DBA NTX Community Food Pantry) is dedicated to building relationships by sharing resources, hope and faith in a welcoming environment, with love and dignaty.

Human Services
8
Your Harvest House

Harvest House exists to restore hope and dignity by equipping families to overcome crisis and build long-term stability. We do this by pairing practical resources with relational support and spiritual encouragement, so help becomes lasting…

—
9
Gods Pantry

God's Pantry exists to extend a helping hand, to the needy, by providing food to anyone who is facing circumstances beyond their control. The pantry serves all people, with respect and compassion, allowing them to maintain their…

Food & Nutrition
10
Food Bank of West Central Texas

To procure and distribute nutritional food to qualified agencies that feed the hungry of West Central Texas.

Food & Nutrition
11
Community Lifeline Center

Community lifeline center envisions a community where all of our neighbors are provided resources to overcome temporary adversity. we can achieve this vision by focusing on our mission to provide residents of collin county with basic…

Human Services
12
Under the Bridge Ministries Inc

We are a faith based non-profit organization that serves and cares for members in our community experiencing homelessness in the East Lancaster corridor of Fort Worth, TX. Every Sunday evening, we provide warm meals, drinks, clothes, hair…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Freedom House; the most unlike its peers is Tarrant County Hands of Hope. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

42 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 42 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

3
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
42/42
Grantees still filing
22/42
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $4,519,001 · Housing & ShelterTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTYARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER: $205,000 · Housing & ShelterTarrant Area Food Bank: $1,200,000 · OtherTarrant Area Food BankRecovery Resource Council: $630,000 · OtherRecovery Resource CouncilFort Worth Housing Solutions: $500,000 · OtherFort Worth Housing SolutionsNORTH TX COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250,000 · OtherNORTH TX COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONThe Heights Ellis Co Family Resourc: $200,000 · OtherChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $175,000 · OtherSamaritan House: $150,000 · Other+34 more: $1,216,000 · Other+34 moreFORT WORTH HOPE CENTER THE HOPE CENTER: $125,000 · Human ServicesFORT WORT…TARRANT COUNTY HANDS OF HOPE: $110,000 · Human ServicesTARRANT C…CITYSQUARE: $100,000 · Human ServicesCITYSQUAR…FREEDOM HOUSE: $100,000 · Human ServicesFREEDOM H…Mission Central Metroplex Inc: $95,000 · Human ServicesMission C…SAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $80,000 · Human ServicesSAFEHAVEN…PARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC: $80,000 · Human ServicesPARKER CO…WESTAID: $60,000 · Human ServicesWESTAIDCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $45,000 · Human ServicesNORTHSIDE INTERCOMMUNITY AGENCY INC: $35,000 · Human Services+4 more: $102,500 · Human Services+4 moreCOMMUNITY LINK MISSION INC: $225,000 · Food & NutritionHelp Out Center Inc: $100,000 · Food & NutritionHIM Food Bank Inc: $75,000 · Food & NutritionCUISINE FOR HEALING: $65,000 · Food & NutritionArlington Urban Ministries: $220,000 · ReligionWEST FORT WORTH CENTER OF HOPE INC: $50,000 · Religion+1 more: $5,000 · ReligionWI Cook Foundation Inc: $195,000 · HealthSIMPLY GRACE: $36,000 · HealthAIDS OUTREACH CENTER: $10,000 · HealthARLINGTON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 · Philanthropy
Housing & Shelter$4,724,001Other$4,321,000Human Services$932,500Food & Nutrition$465,000Religion$275,000Health$241,000Philanthropy$50,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE PRESBYTERIAN NIGHT SHELTER OF TARRANT COUNTY: $4,519,001 over 5y, 13% of budgetTarrant Area Food Bank: $1,200,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetRecovery Resource Council: $630,000 over 3y, 1.7% of budgetCOMMUNITY LINK MISSION INC: $225,000 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetArlington Urban Ministries: $220,000 over 3y, 10.0% of budgetARLINGTON LIFE SHELTER: $205,000 over 3y, 4.2% of budgetWI Cook Foundation Inc: $195,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetChrist's Haven for Children Inc: $175,000 over 2y, 2.1% of budgetFORT WORTH HOPE CENTER THE HOPE CENTER: $125,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetTARRANT COUNTY HANDS OF HOPE: $110,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetHelp Out Center Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCITYSQUARE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTHE GATEHOUSE CORPORATION: $100,000 over 3y, 85% of budgetFREEDOM HOUSE: $100,000 over 1y, 7.0% of budgetMission Central Metroplex Inc: $95,000 over 2y, 4.2% of budgetSAFEHAVEN OF TARRANT COUNTY: $80,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetPARKER COUNTY CENTER OF HOPE INC: $80,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetHIM Food Bank Inc: $75,000 over 1y, 3.1% of budgetCUISINE FOR HEALING: $65,000 over 3y, 5.3% of budgetWESTAID: $60,000 over 3y, 2.9% of budgetACH CHILD AND FAMILY SERVICES: $55,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCATHOLIC CHARITIES INC: $50,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetWEST FORT WORTH CENTER OF HOPE INC: $50,000 over 1y, 16% of budgetARLINGTON ISD EDUCATION FOUNDATION: $50,000 over 1y, 3.3% of budgetCOMMUNITY ENRICHMENT CENTER INC: $45,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSIMPLY GRACE: $36,000 over 3y, 1.1% of budgetNORTHSIDE INTERCOMMUNITY AGENCY INC: $35,000 over 2y, 3.9% of budget6 STONES MISSION NETWORK: $30,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetTHE LADDER ALLIANCE: $27,500 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetFORTRESS YOUTH DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetUNITED COMMUNITY CENTERS INC: $25,000 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetHOPE SUPPLY CO: $25,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE GLADNEY CENTER FOR ADOPTION: $22,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetFossil Creek Community Development Center: $20,000 over 1y, 33% of budgetCHRISTIAN COMMUNITY STOREHOUSE INC: $20,000 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetAUSTIN STREET CENTER: $20,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetCenter for Survivors of Torture: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetDallas Area Habitat for Humanity Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHI PSI EDUCATIONAL TRUST INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetAIDS OUTREACH CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMANSFIELD MISSON CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Communities Foundatio…Community Foundation …Thomas M Helen McKee …United Way of Tarrant…Bnsf Railway Foundati…Sid W Richardson Foun…America's CharitiesKen W Davis FoundationThe Fort Worth Founda…Amon G Carter Foundat…Textron Charitable Tr…The Ninnie L Baird Fo…
Communities Foundation of Texas IncTX47.3× affinity27 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Community Foundation of North Texas (Tax · Thomas M Helen McKee & John P Ryan Fo John P Ryan Foundation Inc · United Way of Tarrant County · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Sid W Richardson Foundation · America's Charities · Ken W Davis Foundation · The Fort Worth Foundation Trust · Amon G Carter Foundation · Textron Charitable Trust Dtd 122353 · The Ninnie L Baird Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization Norman M Kronick Fort Worth Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from Norman M Kronick Fort Worth Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    16report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to Norman M Kronick Fort Worth Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to Norman M Kronick Fort Worth Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Norman M Kronick Fort Worth’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home