Skip to content
New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence

The coalition's mission is to improve the response to and reduce the impact of domestic violence in new mexico.

$73k
Granted FY2023
1
Grants FY2023
1
States reached
$73k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2023.

Human Services$1.1MAnimals$327kFood & Nutrition$94kArts & Culture$78kCrime & Legal$73kHealth$44k
02FY2023 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$72,874
Median grant
1
States reached
$730k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ANIMAL PROTECTION OF NM$72,874
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–22, $501k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $17k → 14%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $63k → 18%VALENCIA SHELTER: $46k → 19%DVRC INC: $16k → 14%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $62k → 18%VALENCIA SHELTER: $45k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $16k → 14%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $59k → 18%VALENCIA SHELTER: $40k → 19%DOMESTIC VIOLENCE RESOURCE CENTER: $15k → 14%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $59k → 18%VALENCIA SHELTER: $29k → 19%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $17k → 18%COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE: $17k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.5M · 9 repeat orgs$216k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +73% since the first grant, against +41% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 0 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
4

Total granted

$1.5M
$143k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+73%
+41%

Still filing today

89%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23
Human ServicesAnimalsCrime & LegalCommunity ImprovementHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ENLACE COMUNITARIO
    6× · 2017–2022 · $302k · revenue +83%
  • CA
    COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $277k · revenue +44%
  • AP
    ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO
    6× · 2017–2022 · $254k · revenue +73%

Funded once

  • HH
    HAVEN HOUSE INC
    one grant, 2020 · $48k · revenue +19%
  • NU
    NAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $44k · revenue +41%
  • CC
    CRISIS CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICOgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $26k · revenue +52%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Casa Fortaleza

Casa fortaleza provides advocacy, case management services, therapy, and outreach to victims/survivors of sexual violence.

Health
2
Tu Casa Incorporated

To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.

—
3
Womens Aid in Crisis Inc

Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.

Human Services
4
Domestic Abuse Council of Volusia County Inc

Assist victims of domestic violence

Human Services
5
Center of Protective Environment Inc

Mission: help people affected by domestic violence, sexual violence and other forms of abuse, in otero and lincoln counties, new mexico by providing a comprehensive array of direct services, including crisis intervention, shelter,…

Human Services
6
Beyond Violence Inc

Provide assistance to victims of domestic violence

Human Services
7
Domestic Violence Safe Options Svcs

Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt

—
8
Against Abuse Inc

To provide services, support, and education to all who experience the effects of family dysfunction and/or violence, past and present.

Human Services
9
Domestic Violence Sexual Assault Center Inc

Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…

Human Services
10
Northeastern Utah Friends Against Family Violence

Friends Against Family Violence (FAFV) is a community based nonprofit domestic violence program. FAFV provides services, shelter, crisis intervention, and prevention in the Tri-County of Uintah, Duchesne, and Daggett. We provide services…

Health
11
Advocates for Victims of Violence Inc

Advocates for Victims of Violence provides emergency shelter and essential services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault and child abuse.

Human Services
12
Baraga Co Shelter Home

Shelter to domestic violence victims

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Esperanza Shelter Inc; the most unlike its peers is Animal Protection New Mexico. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
7
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/13
Grantees still filing
11/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $277,435 · Human ServicesCOMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INCVALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $159,400 · Human ServicesVALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMEST…GRAMMY'S HOUSE ARTESIA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $90,474 · Human ServicesGRAMMY'S HOUSE ARTESIA DOMESTIC VIOLEN…DVRC INC: $64,397 · Human ServicesDVRC INCPUEBLO OF NAMBE: $171,451 · OtherPUEBLO OF NAMBEFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $152,647 · OtherFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INCCRISIS CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICO: $25,730 · OtherCRISIS CENTER OF NORTHER…Esperanza Shelter Inc: $24,946 · OtherEsperanza Shelter IncANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO: $254,344 · AnimalsANIMAL PROTECTION NEW…ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO INC (APNM)FOUNDATION: $72,874 · AnimalsANIMAL PROTECTION NEW…ENLACE COMUNITARIO: $302,163 · Community ImprovementENLACE COMUNITARIOROBERTA'S PLACE INC: $48,975 · Crime & LegalHAVEN HOUSE INC: $48,287 · Crime & LegalNAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTER: $43,730 · Health
Human Services$591,706Other$374,774Animals$327,218Community Improvement$302,163Crime & Legal$97,262Health$43,730

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetENLACE COMUNITARIO: $302,163 over 6y, 2.6% of budgetCOMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC: $277,435 over 6y, 2.2% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO: $254,344 over 6y, 2.3% of budgetVALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $159,400 over 4y, 4.5% of budgetFAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC: $152,647 over 4y, 2.7% of budgetGRAMMY'S HOUSE ARTESIA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER: $90,474 over 4y, 3.7% of budgetANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO INC (APNM)FOUNDATION: $72,874 over 1y, 44% of budgetDVRC INC: $64,397 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetROBERTA'S PLACE INC: $48,975 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetHAVEN HOUSE INC: $48,287 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetNAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTER: $43,730 over 1y, 6.6% of budgetCRISIS CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICO: $25,730 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetEsperanza Shelter Inc: $24,946 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Santa Fe Community Fo…New Mexico Community …New Mexico Coalition …Nusenda FoundationCon Alma Health Found…Carl C Anderson Sr an…Albuquerque Community…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Santa Fe Community FoundationNM19.6× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs · Nusenda Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    8report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2023, released 2023. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2023, the most recent year this funder made grants.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home