· Public charity
New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs
To utilize training, research, policy and community engagement towards our goal to address and end sexual violence in new mexico.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k1 grant · $6k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $129k
- $50k–250k12 grants · $1.5M
- $250k+10 grants · $5.7M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM | $1,105,967 |
| ARISE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES | $738,225 |
| VALENCIA SHELTER SERVICES | $700,875 |
| SILVER REGIONAL SASS | $688,484 |
| CASA FORTALEZA | $577,760 |
| SOLACE CRISIS TREATMENT CENTER | $575,563 |
| COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE | $421,125 |
| LA PINON | $303,447 |
| COPE | $294,173 |
| AFFIRMING HEART VICTIM SERVICES | $252,647 |
| ALBUQUERQUE SANE COLLABORATIVE CENT | $209,104 |
| ROBERTAS PLACE | $195,837 |
| ALTERNATIVE TO VIOLENCE | $187,318 |
| NM ASIAN FAMILY CENTER | $180,933 |
| THE ROSWELL REFUGE SANE | $120,382 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–25, $10.6M) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 17%. 94% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +72% since the first grant, against +35% for the ones you funded once.
36 repeat relationships — 28 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $67k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- SASEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM9× · 2017–2025 · $5.0M · revenue +107% · 52% of their budget
- LPLA PINON SEXUAL ASSAULT RECOVERY9× · 2017–2025 · $3.0M · revenue +121% · 26% of their budget
- VSVALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE8× · 2017–2025 · $2.7M · revenue +140%
Funded once
- IPIMPACT PERSONAL SAFETYone grant, 2024 · $31k · revenue 0%
- TUTHE UNIVERSITY OF NEW MEXICOone grant, 2022 · $30k
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2022 · $11k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.
The mission is to end relationship and sexual violence by being a catalyst for caring communities and social justice. the vision is for all people to live full, free, expressive, and empowered lives in a safe, healthy, vibrant, and…
Codac provides tools, support and services to individuals, families, and communities so they may live with dignity, free from the harmful effects of mental illness, substance use disorders and trauma.
Provide emergency shelter care for adult persons and their children who are victims of domestic violence, and educate the community about the problems related to domestic violence is all its forms.
The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.
CBV heals the trauma of sexual assault and domestic violence by providing crisis intervention, safety, advocacy, and education to survivors and our community.
To reduce the effects of family violence and sexual assault and to assist victims of these crimes through programs of support, education and advocacy.
Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt
The mission of the center for sexual assault and domestic violence survivors is to advocate for non-violence through intervention, education, and prevention in order to create a safe environment for all individuals, families and…
To provide direct service, advocacy and support to those affected by sexual assault in larimer county, colorado. this is accomplished through crisis intervention, therapy, education, and support services.
The casa program is a community-based program that recruits, trains and supports citizen-volunteers to advocate for the best interests of abused and neglected children in courtrooms and communities. the organization serves children in…
To provide services, support, and education to all who experience the effects of family dysfunction and/or violence, past and present.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Community Against Violence Inc and the most unlike its peers is Kids Inc Child Advocacy Center. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
Your grantees are a median of 30 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 3% of your grantees by number, and just 7% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
34 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 34 of the 43 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES OF NWNM ↗
- Who funds LA PINON SEXUAL ASSAULT RECOVERY ↗
- Who funds VALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds SILVER REGIONAL SEXUAL ASSAULT SUPPORT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CASA FORTALEZA ↗
- Who funds ARISE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds ALBUQUERQUE SANE COLLABORATIVE ↗
- Who funds SOLACE SEXUAL ASSAULT SERVICES ↗
- Who funds RAPE CRISIS CENTER OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds ALTERNATIVES TO VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds St Vincent Hospital ↗
- Who funds NEW MEXICO ASIAN FAMILY CENTER ↗
- Who funds ROSWELL REFUGE FOR BATTERED ADULTS ↗
- Who funds AFFIRMING HEART VICTIM SERVICES ↗
- Who funds The Phoenix House Sexual Assault & Domestic Violence Resource Center ↗
- Who funds SOUTHERN NEW MEXICO WELLNESS ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds CENTER OF PROTECTIVE ENVIRONMENT INC ↗
- Who funds ROBERTA'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds THE ARC OF NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds UNICA ↗
- Who funds TAOS HEALTH SYSTEMS INC ↗
- Who funds COALITION TO STOP VIOLENCE AGAINST NATIVE WOMEN ↗
- Who funds CHILDHAVEN INC ↗
- Who funds KIDS INC CHILD ADVOCACY CENTER ↗
- Who funds TEWA WOMEN UNITED ↗
- Who funds CHAVES COUNTY CASA PROGRAM ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES AND YOUTH INC ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds THE TRANSGENDER RESOURCE CENTER OF NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds IMPACT PERSONAL SAFETY ↗
- Who funds OTERO COUNTY HOSPITAL ASSOCIATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · New Mexico Fund for Women and Girls · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · National Children's Alliance Inc · Albuquerque Community Foundation · Marshall L and Perrine D McCune Charitable Foundation Inc · The James N Cost Foundation · New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Network for Good
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs?
Find your warmest path to New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.