· Public charity
New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence
The coalition's mission is to improve the response to and reduce the impact of domestic violence in new mexico.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2023.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ANIMAL PROTECTION OF NM | $72,874 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $501k) land where the poverty rate runs at 18%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 87% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +73% since the first grant, against +41% for the ones you funded once.
9 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2023, 9 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2023 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2023, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $73k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- ECENLACE COMUNITARIO6× · 2017–2022 · $302k · revenue +83%
- CACOMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC6× · 2017–2022 · $277k · revenue +44%
- APANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO6× · 2017–2022 · $254k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- HHHAVEN HOUSE INCone grant, 2020 · $48k · revenue +19%
- NUNAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTERgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $44k · revenue +41%
- CCCRISIS CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICOgraduatedone grant, 2020 · $26k · revenue +52%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Casa fortaleza provides advocacy, case management services, therapy, and outreach to victims/survivors of sexual violence.
To support healthy violence-free lives and relationships for all children and adults in the San Luis Valley by providing crisis intervention services advocacy and counseling for victims and survivors of domestic and sexual violence.
Domestic violence shelter provides 24 hour a day crisis intervention and advocacy along with emergency food, clothing, and shelter to those in situations related to domestic violence and sexual assault.
Assist victims of domestic violence
Mission: help people affected by domestic violence, sexual violence and other forms of abuse, in otero and lincoln counties, new mexico by providing a comprehensive array of direct services, including crisis intervention, shelter,…
Provide assistance to victims of domestic violence
Aid victims of domestic violence/assualt
To provide services, support, and education to all who experience the effects of family dysfunction and/or violence, past and present.
Our mission is to provide compassionate support, resources, and advocacy for victims of violent crime. we are dedicated to empowering children, teens and adults in their journey to healing by offering a safe place, emotional care, and the…
Friends Against Family Violence (FAFV) is a community based nonprofit domestic violence program. FAFV provides services, shelter, crisis intervention, and prevention in the Tri-County of Uintah, Duchesne, and Daggett. We provide services…
Advocates for Victims of Violence provides emergency shelter and essential services to victims of domestic violence, sexual assault and child abuse.
Shelter to domestic violence victims
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Esperanza Shelter Inc and the most unlike its peers is Animal Protection New Mexico. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ENLACE COMUNITARIO ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY AGAINST VIOLENCE INC ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds VALENCIA SHELTER FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE ↗
- Who funds FAMILY CRISIS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds GRAMMY'S HOUSE ARTESIA DOMESTIC VIOLENCE SHELTER ↗
- Who funds ANIMAL PROTECTION NEW MEXICO INC (APNM)FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds DVRC INC ↗
- Who funds ROBERTA'S PLACE INC ↗
- Who funds HAVEN HOUSE INC ↗
- Who funds NAVAJO UNITED METHODIST CENTER ↗
- Who funds CRISIS CENTER OF NORTHERN NEW MEXICO ↗
- Who funds Esperanza Shelter Inc ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Santa Fe Community Foundation · New Mexico Community Foundation · New Mexico Coalition of Sexual Assault Programs · Nusenda Foundation · Con Alma Health Foundation Inc · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Albuquerque Community Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.