· Public charity
The Asian American Foundation
THE ASIAN AMERICAN FOUNDATION (taaf) serves the aapi community in their pursuit of belonging and prosperity that is free from discrimination, slander and violence, in furtherance of its charitable mission taaf conducts.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2021–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2024
- $10k–50k9 grants · $240k
- $50k–250k48 grants · $5.3M
- $250k+11 grants · $3.5M
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES | $500,000 |
| CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE | $400,000 |
| COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO | $400,000 |
| SIKH COALITION | $360,000 |
| NEW YORK UNIVERSITY | $300,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES | $300,000 |
| CISC-CHINESE INFORMATION & SERVICE CENTER | $250,000 |
| RIDEBACK RISE INC | $250,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN JOURNALISTS ASSOCIATION | $250,000 |
| ASIAN AMERICAN RESOURCE WORKSHOP | $250,000 |
| CENTER FOR ASIAN AMERICAN MEDIA | $250,000 |
| SUNDANCE INSTITUTE | $207,000 |
| SOUTHEAST ASIA RESOURCE ACTION CENTER | $200,000 |
| CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER | $200,000 |
| TEACHAAPI | $150,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–24, $4.3M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 78% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +25% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.
50 repeat relationships — 47 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 17 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 83% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1.5M went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES4× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +37%- CACHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC4× · 2021–2024 · $1.6M · revenue +25%
- TSTHE SIKH COALITION4× · 2021–2024 · $855k · revenue +67%
Funded once
- ALANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUEgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue +34%
Chinese for Affirmative Actionone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue -60%- TPThe Pew Charitable Trustsgraduatedone grant, 2021 · $1.0M · revenue +36%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
AAPIP expands and mobilizes resources for AAPI communities to build a more just and equitable society.
The Asian Law Caucus's mission is to promote, advance, and represent the legal and civil rights of Asian American Pacific Islander (AAPI) communities, recognizing that social, economic, political and racial inequalities continue to exist…
Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Atlanta's mission is to protect and promote the civil and human rights of Asian Americans, Native Hawaiians, and Pacific Islanders in Georgia and the Southeast through policy advocacy, legal services,…
Asian Immigrant Women Advocates empowers low-income, limited English speaking immigrant women and youth through education, leadership development and civic participation programs.
Advancing the AANHPI communities through increased leadership and civic engagement.
Asians for Collective Action (ACA) harnesses the strenghts of Asians and Asian Americans to drive systemic change to create a just, healthy, and thriving community for all.
Founded in the Year 2006, the Association of Asian American Investment Managers AAAIM is a national trade association dedicated to the advance of AAPIs Asian Americans & Pacific-Islanders in the asset management industry. AAAIM supports…
To empower AAPI youth in underserved communities through culturally responsive programming and advocacy.AALEAD envisions a United States in which all youth are supported, empowered, and celebrated within equitable, abundant and thriving…
A non-profit dedicated to the advancement of the field of Asian Studies through international exchange, networking, publication, research support and career development.
The core mission of ASIAN, Inc. is the empowerment of the Asian American Community to achieve social equality by reducing dependency to create and expand access to opportunities in the areas of business development, housing and education.…
APEN builds immigrant and refugee power for a just transition with local roots and statewide impact so all people can live, work, learn, play and thrive in a clean and healthy environment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is National Asian Pacific American Women's Forum and the most unlike its peers is Jeremy Lin Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 29 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 3% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
102 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 102 of the 106 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - AAJC INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN HEALTH SERVICES ↗
- Who funds CHINESE AMERICAN SERVICE LEAGUE INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN WOMEN'S FORUM ↗
- Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
- Who funds Chinese for Affirmative Action ↗
- Who funds The Pew Charitable Trusts ↗
- Who funds TALKINGPOINTS ↗
- Who funds THE SIKH COALITION ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY YOUTH CENTER OF SAN FRANCISCO ↗
- Who funds Jeremy Lin Foundation ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN FEDERATION INC ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN JOURNALISTS ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds GOFUNDMEORG ↗
- Who funds Sundance Institute ↗
- Who funds ASIAN PACIFIC COMMUNITY FUND OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN RESOURCE WORKSHOP INC ↗
- Who funds Center for Asian American Media ↗
- Who funds RIDEBACK RISE INC ↗
- Who funds Chinese Information and Service Center ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE - CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ASIAN PACIFIC AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICAN FUTURES ↗
- Who funds CHINATOWN SERVICE CENTER ↗
- Who funds THE ASIAN AMERICAN EDUCATION PROJECT ↗
- Who funds ASIAN AMERICANS ADVANCING JUSTICE SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
- Who funds ACT TO CHANGE ↗
- Who funds COALITION OF ASIAN PACIFICS IN ENTERTAINMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Sikh American Legal Defense & Education ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL KOREAN AMERICAN SERVICE AND EDUCATION CONSORTIUM INC ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST ASIA RESOURCE ACTION CENTER SEARAC ↗
- Who funds New York University ↗
- Who funds SOUTHEAST ASIAN MUTUAL ASSISTANCE ASSOCIATIONS COALITION INC ↗
- Who funds Daya Inc ↗
- Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CONNECTICUT FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds Asian American Voices for Education Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERFAITH AMERICA ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Gofundmeorg · Asian Americans Advancing Justice - Aajc Inc · Asian American Federation Inc · Asian American Coalition for Children and Families Inc · Amalgamated Charitable Foundation Inc · NEO Philanthropy Inc · National Coalition for Asian Pacific American Community Development · Robin Hood Foundation · Wallace H Coulter Trust · Tides Foundation · Rockefeller Philanthropy Advisors Inc · Wallace H Coulter Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Asian American Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Aapi Montclair Inc — 21% of income from government
- Asian American Resource Workshop Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.