How much did NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE EXCHANGE OF grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE EXCHANGE OF’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02FY2024 · 485 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k215 grants · $1.5M
$10k–50k196 grants · $4.0M
$50k–250k58 grants · $6.2M
$250k+16 grants · $19M

$11,658

Median grant

States reached

$99M

Total assets

Largest grants

RESOURCES EXCHANGE ASSOCIATION$6,305,156
NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE ASSOCIATION$3,483,535
CIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC$1,480,968
CEDAR CREST BIBLE FELLOWSHIP$1,477,691
NORTH STAR FOUNDATION INC$1,139,957
UNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$716,876
FAMILY LIFE FELLOWSHIP$497,967
GRACE CHURCH$466,437
STARDUST NON-PROFIT BUILDING SUPPLIES$438,822
YOUTH FAIR CHANCE INC$437,721
WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP$400,250
GOSERVE$379,587
LUBAVITCH CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF GAINESVILLE INC$372,843
BRAND NEW CHURCH$366,211
HOME OF HEROES$348,883

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY23–24, $3.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13% — the area typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$71M · 318 repeat orgs$9.9M to everyone else

318 repeat relationships — 318 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 165 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

318

350

Total granted

$71M

$6.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+35%

+36%

Still filing today

49%

38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 87% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.8M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

Human ServicesEducationHealthReligionHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

RE
RESOURCES EXCHANGE ASSOCIATION
7× · 2018–2024 · $15M · revenue +1377% · 92% of their budget
CD
CIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC
7× · 2018–2024 · $8.0M · revenue +184%
NA
NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE ASSOCIATION
7× · 2018–2024 · $5.9M · revenue +92%

Funded once

HT
HAND TO HAND FOUNDATION INCgraduated
one grant, 2023 · $641k · revenue +1440% · 34% of their budget
WC
WAWASEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORP
one grant, 2023 · $207k
GR
GALESBURG RESCUE MISSION
one grant, 2023 · $196k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

Lighthouse Christian Home

Provide a christian home and services for adults with developmental disabilities

Human Services

Cunningham Childrens Home of Urbana Il

Provide therapeutic services to youth in educational, community, & residential care settings.

Human Services

Craftsbury Community Care Center

Residential care home for elderly and handicapped.

Human Services

Human Services Inc

Outpatient mental health, mental health residential, and homeless services.

Human Services

Ccmh Child Care Center

Providing childcare services to the community

Human Services

Illinois Presbyterian Home

Housing for the elderly

Human Services

Christian Residential Opportunities & Social Services Inc

Group homes

—

Christian Services Inc

Improving the quality of life for families and children by eliminating barriers to opportunity

Human Services

National Church Residences At Home

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—

National Church Residences At Home

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors.

—

Christ Church Day Care Inc

Provide care for up to 58 children, ages 6 weeks to five years of age, monday through friday year round.

Education

Summitview Child & Family Services Inc

Residential care and treatment of emotionally and physically neglected children and adults

—

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Hagedorn Little Village School and the most unlike its peers is Maharishi International University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 38 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 2% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

2%35/2,159

the rest of the field

11%

206,130/1,817,406

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

882 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

265

Early backer (in before they grew)

823/882

Grantees still filing

644/882

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$45,974,867International$16,254,003Crime & Legal$5,951,867Human Services$4,329,341Health$3,768,708Religion$2,478,305Education$1,787,905

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a loosely connected circle, clustered around a few shared anchors.

The George W Bush FoundationTX15.5× affinity13 shared granteesties to 8 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The George W Bush Foundation · North Carolina High School Athletic · Round It Up America Inc · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Nc Greenpower Corporation · Bradley Fedorow Perpetual Charitable Trust · Project Lead the Way Inc · Horace a & S Ella Kimball Foundation · Adventist Community Services North · Good360 · Partnership for a Healthier America · Masonic Home of Missouri

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE EXCHANGE OF funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: BA RUCH MINISTRIES INC BA RUCH INTERNATIONAL PRAYER.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

insufficient risk

Limited financial data in public filings.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up +69% since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 364341794 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on BA RUCH MINISTRIES INC BA RUCH INTERNATIONAL PRAYER, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

Awaiting reportFinancial stability— Runway not derivable from filings.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2023; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 95% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to National Association for the Exchange Of?

Find your warmest path to National Association for the Exchange Of through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE EXCHANGE OF

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

882 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to National Association for the Exchange Of?

More from the funding graph

NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE EXCHANGE OF

What you funded, over time

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

882 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to National Association for the Exchange Of?

More from the funding graph