Loading…
Loading…
Iowa · Nonprofit
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY (Iowa) is funded by 21 grantmakers whose IRS filings report $1,858,250 in grants to it, the largest being UNITED WAY OF SIOUXLAND INC ($1,002,381). 13 of them have funded it in more than one year.
Against its field
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY runs a healthier operating margin than three-quarters of the 1,688 youth development nonprofits its size.
this organization peer median middle 50% of peers· 1,688 youth development nonprofits $1M–$10M, FY2024
Revenue, expenses and net assets — each indexed to 100 at its first filing year, so you read the trajectory, not the magnitude. The shaded band is where the middle 50% of its peers' revenue would sit, given their growth.
The funding model — what share of revenue comes from contributions, programs, investments and other sources — and whether it's shifting.
Government-grant reliance: 2024 5%. Grants only — government contracts and fees sit inside program revenue.
71% of GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY’s revenue is contributions — about as donation-reliant as the typical peer (83% for the typical peer).
Operating surplus or deficit each year, and months of liquidity in hand. 5 of the last 8 reported years ran a deficit.
$25k from 1 funders in 2025, up from $164k and 3 in 2017.
4 of 21 of your funders are donor-advised or pass-through sponsors (tagged DAF) — 13% of grant dollars received. That money is really individual donors directing a sponsor; the institutions to cultivate are the non-DAF funders.
From the IRS filings of GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY’s funders (the co-funder graph). Top 19 of 21 funders by total. Association, not causation.
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY leans on a few funders — its largest provides 54% of grant income and the top three 73%; half comes from just 1 funder.
the vertical line marks half of all grant income — 1 funder to its left
Largest funder’s share by year: 2017 87% · 2018 59% · 2019 63% · 2020 61% · 2021 58% · 2022 59% · 2023 32% · 2024 45% · 2025 100% — growing more concentrated.
“Effective funders” = inverse Herfindahl index (1 / Σ shareᵢ²) — the number of equal-sized funders that would give the same concentration.
44% of GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY's funders are still giving 3 years after their first grant; 62% give in more than one year at all.
Share of funders still giving k years after their first recorded grant, pooled across every acquisition cohort. A funder counts as retained in a year only if it made a grant that year.
GIRLS INCORPORATED OF SIOUX CITY is locally rooted: 77% of its grant income comes from Iowa funders.
In-state vs out-of-state, by year
Grantmakers that don’t fund you yet, surfaced two ways: they back organizations that share your funders, or their grantees resemble your mission. The ones both signals agree on come first. Your 21 funders put you typical among the 400 organizations that share them.
From the co-funder graph (funders backing at least two comparable organizations, shrunk for grantee count, donor-advised and mega-funds excluded) and the universe embeddings. A research starting point; overlap is association, not a guarantee of fit.
Nonprofits whose mission and program text most resemble this one, by semantic similarity over the universe of US filings — the closest peers, and often the clearest route to shared or prospective funders.
Read directly from this organization’s own Form 990, as neutral context.
67% of spending goes to programs.
88%
Share of support from the public (Schedule A) — the basis for its public-charity status.
Every figure is read directly from IRS Form 990 / 990-PF e-file XML — this organization’s own return for FY2024 (financials across 2017–2024), and the filings of 21funders that report grants to it. “On record” means captured in the filings we have parsed — a funder that does not e-file, or whose grant detail is not itemized, will not appear. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind. view filing