How much did ROUND IT UP AMERICA INC grant in FY2024?

A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of ROUND IT UP AMERICA INC’s grantee dollars go to organizations outside the IRS cause taxonomy (common for large international and research funders), so a chart would be mostly “unclassified” and misrepresent the portfolio.

02beneath the categories

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Beneath the NTEE codes, this is what the grant descriptions actually say.

…and in their own words, year by year

2018

special olympicssportssharingspousesdisabledrestaurantautism

2019

hopespecial olympicstogether createcreate life-changinglife-changing wisheswishes childrenchildren critical

2021

elementarygwinnettsurround studentsstudents empoweringempowering staystay achieveraising

2022

isdcleanexperiencesteacherparishpasadenamesa unified

2023

middleintermediatejohncarvervista elementaryridgetaylor

2024

mary'smiddleptaadvocateusdcorderomiami

Words distinctive to each year’s grant purposes (TF-IDF) · event-driven terms in cyan.

03FY2024 · 173 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

Under $10k17 grants · $134k
$10k–50k142 grants · $2.1M
$50k–250k9 grants · $538k
$250k+5 grants · $2.2M

$11,735

Median grant

States reached

$3.3M

Total assets

Largest grants

CHILDREN OF FALLEN PATRIOTS FOUNDATION$579,421
FEEDING AMERICA$570,607
HOPE FOR THE WARRIORS$522,436
UNITED STATES HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EDUCATIONAL FUND$295,000
NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE$275,000
SCORE FOUNDATION$100,000
AMERICAN RED CROSS$80,372
FOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION$56,791
BOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF AMERICA$50,600
BURLINGAME SCHOOLS USD 454$50,000
FRIENDS OF CUSD #5$50,000
RICHARDS R-V SCHOOL DISTRICT$50,000
DEMOTTE ELEMENTARY SCHOOL$50,000
OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION$50,000
DEER CREEK COMMUNITY ENRICHMENT FOUNDATION$45,000

02The need

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $2.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 16% — the area typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars reach neighborhoods with above-average need. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA, United Way ALICE — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge

repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

66%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.

$13M · 172 repeat orgs$6.7M to everyone else

172 repeat relationships — 122 still active in FY2024, 50 since wound down; 37 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

172

416

Total granted

$13M

$4.7M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%

+48%

Still filing today

21%

16%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 60% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.0M went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

EducationPhilanthropyHuman ServicesFood & NutritionHealthYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

US
UNITED STATES HISPANIC CHAMBER OF COMMERCE EDUCATIONAL FUND
3× · 2021–2024 · $1.8M · revenue +1445% · 31% of their budget
NU
NATIONAL URBAN LEAGUE
4× · 2020–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +46%
FEEDING AMERICA
7× · 2017–2024 · $892k · revenue +77%

Funded once

MAKE A WISH FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2017 · $151k · revenue +35%
ST
SAVE THE MUSIC FOUNDATIONgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $105k · revenue +174%
SL
SALT LAKE CITY SCHOOL DISTRICTgraduated
one grant, 2022 · $68k · revenue +31%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

North Kansas City Schools

Engaging our communities to support and fund extraordinary educational experiences.

Education

Houston Independent School District

The HISD Foundation supports Houston Independent School District's schools and programs.

—

El Segundo Education Foundation

The el segundo education foundation represents a partnership of businesses, individuals and families organized to support and enhance programs of the el segundo unified school district and to promote excellence in education.

—

Santa Barbara Education Foundation

To promote community investment in public education to ensure equity and access to an innovative, world-class education that inspires confidence, competence, and creativity in every student in the Santa Barbara Unified School District.

Education

Partners in Education Foundation

To provide resources to help enhance the quality of education in the el dorado public schools

Education

Silicon Schools Fund Inc

Support the launch of excellent new schools and innovative practices that improve education.

Education

The Education Fund Inc

The purpose of the education fund is to raise funds and provide services to improve the quality of public education in miami dade county public schools.

Education

Pasadena Isd Education Foundation

The mission of the pasadena isd education foundation is to collaborate with the school district and community to reward innovative teaching, promote educational excellence, and provide opportunities to recognize the students and staff of…

Education

The Detroit Public Schools Foundation

To create and enhance educational opportunities for detroit public schools community district students, families and educators.

Education

New Schools Fund

New schools fund's mission is to improve public education.

Education

School Boards for Academic Excellence

To restore academic excellence and parental rights in the american education system by building a national network of state-based organizations and school board members dedicated to reforming policies and practices that improve student…

Civil Rights

Canyons School District Education

Canyons School District Education Foundation works in tandem with community and business partners to build support for public schools and to advance Canyons School Districts mission to help every student become college- and career-ready…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Omaha Public Schools Foundation and the most unlike its peers is The Rose. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side

Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 2% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.3% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund

0.3%2/641

the rest of the field

11%

206,162/1,818,924

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

05the grantee network

126 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

121/126

Grantees still filing

94/126

Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Other$11,288,438Education$3,814,007Human Services$1,988,527Food & Nutrition$1,234,111Philanthropy$1,083,227Public Safety & Disaster$284,945Recreation & Sports$255,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

GenYOUTH IncorporatedIL151.2× affinity170 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: GenYOUTH Incorporated · The George W Bush Foundation · Project Lead the Way Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · For Inspiration and Recognition of · Share Our Strength · Action for Healthy Kids · I Car Education Foundation · The Mr Holland's Opus Foundation · Foundation for Inspiration & Recogn · Southern Poverty Law Center Inc · Fanangel Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organisation ROUND IT UP AMERICA INC funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2025

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

3get no government money at all

0rely on government for over half their income

typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Through Plinth

Your grantmaking, live and operational

This dossier was generated cold from public filings. In Plinth it’s a working system — every applicant assessed and every grant monitored. Here’s a taste, run on one of your grantees: VENTURE MENTORING TEAM.

Agentic due diligence · confidence × risk

Financial management

low risk

~17 months of operating runway; revenue grew over 6 filed years.

Track record & reputation

low risk

6 years of Form 990 filings, still active; revenue up 2.6× since.

Legal standing

low risk

US 501(c)(3); EIN 815139940 on file with current IRS Form 990 filings.

Governance

Live in Plinth

Board composition & governance documents — verified live in Plinth from the applicant.

Compliance & sanctions

Live in Plinth

OFAC / UN sanctions screening — run live in Plinth at assessment.

Program capacity

Live in Plinth

Staffing, M&E and activity alignment — assessed live in Plinth from submitted proposals.

Live · Plinth’s real DD engine

Run the actual assessment on VENTURE MENTORING TEAM, cold from public data.

Generated live from public IRS filings + open web sources by Plinth’s agentic engine. Shown as an illustration of the product, not a formal assessment.

Post-award monitoring · continuous checks

On trackFinancial stability— Roughly 17 months of cash on hand.
On trackSustained operations— Filing through 2024; revenue grew over the period.
WatchReliance on your funding— Your grants peaked at 100% of their budget — load-bearing; a dependency Plinth would track.
Awaiting reportEvidence of delivery— Plinth collects the grantee's own monitoring reports post-award.

What you see here is static and public. In Plinth it’s operational — the full six-pillar framework on every applicant (with their own documents + live registry and sanctions checks), monitoring dashboards on every award, custom board reports, and eligibility routing for intake.

Agentic due diligenceMonitoring dashboardsCustom board reportsEligibility routing

Preview generated from this grantee’s public IRS filings and independent reporting. Pillars marked “live in Plinth” require the applicant’s submitted documents. Shown as illustration, not a formal assessment.

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPro

How do I get to Round It Up America Inc?

Find your warmest path to Round It Up America Inc through people who sit on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the introduction across shared trustees and officers.

Every link is a documented governance overlap in public IRS 990 filings — not a personal network — and each hop carries its own confidence tier. Low-confidence or distant paths are held back rather than guessed.

ROUND IT UP AMERICA INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

126 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Round It Up America Inc?

More from the funding graph

ROUND IT UP AMERICA INC

What you funded, over time

Past the labels — and the year it shifted

Where the money goes

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Who you back again

Backed again, and grew

Funded once

126 grantees, every filing reconciled, 2017–2025.

Government reliance of your grantees

Your grantmaking, live and operational

How do I get to Round It Up America Inc?

More from the funding graph