Skip to content
National Association for the Exchange of Industrial Resources Inc at a glanceAlso receives grants: funding profile →

· Public charity

National Association for the Exchange of Industrial Resources Inc

Naeir's mission is to obtain, catalog and store donated inventory and redistribute such property to its members.

$77M
Granted FY2024still arriving
485
Grants FY2024still arriving
47
States reached
$6.3M
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2024.

Human Services$45MInternational$17MReligion$7.4MHealth$5.7MEducation$2.2MPhilanthropy$989kHousing & Shelter$891kFood & Nutrition$466kOther$0
02FY2024 · 485 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

How this is measured
The 485 grants below total $30,217,588, the rows itemized in this filing. The $76,758,430 headline is the total grant expense on the return; the other $46,540,842 is giving the schedule does not break out (grants under the $5,000 itemization floor, grants to individuals, grants on other schedules). Every figure below describes the itemized rows only.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k215 grants · $1.5M
  • $10k–50k196 grants · $4.0M
  • $50k–250k58 grants · $6.2M
  • $250k+16 grants · $19M
$11,658
Median grant
47
States reached
$127M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
RESOURCES EXCHANGE ASSOCIATION$6,305,156
NATIVE AMERICAN HERITAGE ASSOCIATION$3,483,535
CIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC$1,480,968
CEDAR CREST BIBLE FELLOWSHIP$1,477,691
NORTH STAR FOUNDATION INC$1,139,957
UNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION$716,876
FAMILY LIFE FELLOWSHIP$497,967
GRACE CHURCH$466,437
STARDUST NON-PROFIT BUILDING SUPPLIES$438,822
YOUTH FAIR CHANCE INC$437,721
WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP$400,250
GOSERVE$379,587
LUBAVITCH CHABAD JEWISH CENTER OF GAINESVILLE INC$372,843
BRAND NEW CHURCH$366,211
HOME OF HEROES$348,883
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY23–24, $3.9M) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 71% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%NEW BEGINNINGS COMMUNITY CENTER: $16k → 7%VIETNAMESE SOCIAL SERVICES OF MINNESOTA: $39k → 14%DISTINCTIVE HUMAN SERVICES: $25k → 16%THE GRATEFUL GARMENT PROJECT: $45k → 8%ABRAZAR INC: $84k → 10%THE PEOPLE CONCERN: $22k → 14%ST JOHN'S HOME FOR BOYS: $20k → 13%THE TEACHER'S DESK INC: $1.4M → 13%ABRAZAR INC: $69k → 10%THE TEACHER'S DESK INC: $28k → 13%VIETNAMESE SOCIAL SERVICES OF MINNESOTA: $26k → 14%GREATER RIDGEWOOD YOUTH COUNCIL: $23k → 13%HOPKINS COUNTY COMMUNITY CHEST: $18k → 13%PALESTINE YMCA: $16k → 19%GREATER SOUTH FARROW ROAD COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT FDN: $20k → 16%PEACE LOVE UNDERSTANDING MERCY PLUM FOUNDATION: $18k → 34%CAMP WAPSIE CEDAR RAPIDS METRO YMCA: $83k → 9%SUSIE Q'S KIDS INC: $151k → 10%DEVELOPMENTAL SERVICES OF NORTHWEST KANSAS INC: $20k → 14%DOUGLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $93k → 12%NORTHSTAR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $22k → 15%FAMILIES NETWORK OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $38k → 9%IREDELL COMMUNITY OUTREACH ASSOCIATION: $203k → 9%FAMILY SUPPORT CENTER: $45k → 13%BUSINEIGHBOR INC: $20k → 14%COMMUNITY ACTION ORGANIZATION OF SCIOTO COUNTY INC: $61k → 22%GILMER COUNTY FAMILY RESOURCE NETWORK INC: $15k → 23%BROWN BEAR DAYCARE & LEARNING CENTER: $27k → 6%PATHWAY SERVICES UNLIMITED INC: $52k → 12%BOSSIER COUNCIL ON AGING: $58k → 13%TOYS FOR HAPPINESS: $15k → 18%CAMP WAPSIE CEDAR RAPIDS METRO YMCA: $43k → 9%SUSIE Q'S KIDS INC: $92k → 10%DOUGLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $88k → 12%FAMILIES NETWORK OF WESTERN CONNECTICUT INC: $34k → 9%IREDELL COMMUNITY OUTREACH ASSOCIATION: $38k → 9%TEN UP MINISTRIES INC ANCHOR PROJECT CENTER: $43k → 18%BROWN BEAR DAYCARE & LEARNING CENTER: $15k → 6%PATHWAY SERVICES UNLIMITED INC: $34k → 12%BOSSIER COUNCIL ON AGING: $32k → 13%OACAC HEAD START PROGRAM: $40k → 15%ANTIOCH TRAVELING CLOSET CORP: $28k → 8%OACAC HEAD START PROGRAM: $28k → 15%ANTIOCH TRAVELING CLOSET CORP: $21k → 8%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $21k → 14%BUCKNER CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES: $17k → 14%GLENN HUDSON MUAY THAI SDA HUDSON ACADEMY FOUNDATION: $28k → 14%PEDIATRIC ONCOLOGY TREASURE CHEST FOUNDATION: $19k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

AK
ME
VT
NH
WA
ID
MT
ND
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
OR
NV
WY
SD
IA
IN
OH
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
UT
CO
NE
MO
KY
WV
VA
MD
DE
AZ
NM
KS
AR
TN
NC
SC
DC
OK
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$71M · 317 repeat orgs$9.8M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +29% since the first grant, against +22% for those funded once.

317 repeat relationships: 317 still active in FY2024, 0 since wound down; 163 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

317
349

Total granted

$71M
$6.1M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+29%
+22%

Still filing today

49%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3.7M went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24
Human ServicesEducationHealthReligionHousing & ShelterYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • RE
    RESOURCES EXCHANGE ASSOCIATION
    9× · 2017–2025 · $15M · revenue ×15 · 92% of their budget
  • CD
    CIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $8.0M · revenue +144%
  • NA
    Native American Heritage Association
    9× · 2017–2025 · $5.9M · revenue +117%

Funded once

  • HT
    Hand to Hand Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2023 · $641k · revenue +19% · 34% of their budget
  • WC
    WAWASEE COMMUNITY SCHOOL CORP VEBA TR
    one grant, 2023 · $207k
  • GR
    GALESBURG RESCUE MISSION & WOMENS SHELTER
    one grant, 2023 · $196k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Christian Care Communities Inc Group Return

Christian care communities enhances the journey of life for those we serve. recognizing the unique needs of each individual christian care offers an array of housing and care options including independent living. 24-hour skilled nursing…

Human Services
2
Lighthouse Christian Home and Services Inc

For god's love to be expressed for and by individuals with developmental disabilities through faith based programs and services.

Human Services
3
Residential Services Inc

Residential Services, Inc. provides living options and related supports to people with intellectual and developmental disabilities of all ages.

Health
4
David's House Ministries

To provide quality care, facilities and supportive services for adults with a developmental disability, traumatic brain injury or mental illness. being enabled by god, we strive to provide an intentionally christian environment and program…

Housing & Shelter
5
Lifeworks Incorporated

Lifeworks provides education, jobs and homes for persons with developmental disabilities empowering them to lead meaningful lives within the community. our guiding principles ensure that lifeworks staff and volunteers strive to create and…

Human Services
6
Community Residences Inc

Housing and programs for persons with intellectual disabilities.

Human Services
7
Person Centered Care Services Inc

The organization provides residential habilitation, case management, respite, recreation, day & community habilitation, employment, career development and education services to children and adults with intellectual disabilities so that…

Human Services
8
Salem Christian Homes Inc

Board, care and training of physically and mentally handicapped adults.

Human Services
9
Michael Dunn Center

To empower individuals living with disabilities and challenges to gain independence

Human Services
10
Christ Church Day Care Inc

Building a stronger tomorrow through nurturing today.

Education
11
National Church Residences At Home Hospice Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
12
National Church Residences At Home Health and Wellness Central Ohio

Originating from a christian commitment of service, we provide high quality care, services and communities for seniors

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Inspire Development Centers; the most unlike its peers is Kaye Lees Corner Fountation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

875 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

22
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
205
Early backer (in before they grew)
823/875
Grantees still filing
601/875
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

RESOURCES EXCHANGE ASSOCIATION: $15,473,002 · OtherRESOURCES EXCHANGE ASSOCIATIONCEDAR CREST BIBLE FELLOWSHIP CHURCH: $5,070,334 · OtherCEDAR CREST BIBLE FELLOWSHIP CHURCHFAMILY LIFE FELLOWSHIP: $1,549,751 · Other+147 more: $17,974,214 · Other+147 moreCIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $7,975,906 · InternationalCIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATIO…NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION INC: $7,619,945 · InternationalNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION INC+3 more: $638,586 · InternationalNative American Heritage Association: $5,929,876 · Crime & LegalNative Am…UNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $3,157,050 · Health+7 more: $363,904 · HealthTHE TEACHERS DESK INC: $1,379,258 · Human ServicesSUSIE QS KIDS INC: $242,742 · Human ServicesIREDELL COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $240,618 · Human ServicesFAMILY CONNECTION COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF ATHENS INC: $227,549 · Human ServicesDOUGLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $181,580 · Human ServicesAbrazar Inc: $153,502 · Human ServicesTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CEDAR RAPIDS METROPOLITAN AREA: $126,029 · Human Services+16 more: $874,958 · Human ServicesGOSERVE: $825,754 · ReligionWORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP INC: $603,326 · ReligionVISTA CHRISTIAN RETREAT INC: $266,759 · ReligionNEW TESTAMENT CHURCH PLANTING: $181,304 · ReligionLAKES AREA PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER OF BRAINERD MINNESOTA: $149,054 · Religion+4 more: $186,728 · ReligionHand to Hand Foundation Inc: $640,664 · PhilanthropyHIS FIRST FOUNDATION % JOHN S WIELAND: $304,375 · PhilanthropyBASKET OF HOPE: $275,304 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF GREATER MUSCATINE: $44,241 · Philanthropy
Other$40,067,301International$16,234,437Crime & Legal$5,929,876Health$3,520,954Human Services$3,426,236Religion$2,212,925Philanthropy$1,264,584

Showing the 200 largest grantees by grant value.

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetRESOURCES EXCHANGE ASSOCIATION: $15,473,002 over 9y, 92% of budgetCIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC: $7,975,906 over 8y, 8.7% of budgetNORTHSTAR FOUNDATION INC: $7,619,945 over 9y, 46% of budgetNative American Heritage Association: $5,929,876 over 9y, 3.3% of budgetUNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $3,157,050 over 5y, 8.1% of budgetTHE TEACHERS DESK INC: $1,379,258 over 9y, 4.8% of budgetGOSERVE: $825,754 over 2y, 11% of budgetHand to Hand Foundation Inc: $640,664 over 1y, 34% of budgetYOUTH FAIR CHANCE INC: $606,620 over 9y, 30% of budgetWORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP INC: $603,326 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetSTARDUST NON-PROFIT BUILDING SUPPLIES INC: $458,162 over 9y, 13% of budgetENCHANTED PEACH CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION: $442,104 over 8y, 34% of budgetBRIDGEWAY INC: $321,218 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHIS FIRST FOUNDATION % JOHN S WIELAND: $304,375 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetBASKET OF HOPE: $275,304 over 7y, 47% of budgetVISTA CHRISTIAN RETREAT INC: $266,759 over 9y, 14% of budgetSUSIE QS KIDS INC: $242,742 over 3y, 39% of budgetIREDELL COMMUNITY OUTREACH: $240,618 over 4y, 79% of budgetGIVING IN KINDNESS IN ARKANSAS INC: $237,064 over 9y, 2.5% of budgetFAMILY CONNECTION COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF ATHENS INC: $227,549 over 4y, 9.7% of budgetLYNCHBURG CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $203,320 over 9y, 23% of budgetSIMPLE FOUNDATION: $202,076 over 2y, 6.7% of budgetNEW TRIER EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION: $190,822 over 9y, 18% of budgetTRIANGLE RESIDENTIAL OPTIONS FOR SUBSTANCE ABUSERS INC: $182,970 over 7y, 0.5% of budgetDOUGLASS COMMUNITY SERVICES INC: $181,580 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetJCTOD OUTREACH INC D/B/A JOHNSON PARK CENTER: $179,892 over 9y, 3.7% of budgetMISSION CENTERS OF HOUSTON: $158,447 over 3y, 15% of budgetMission Harvest America Inc: $154,459 over 1y, 55% of budgetAbrazar Inc: $153,502 over 7y, 0.9% of budgetLAKES AREA PREGNANCY SUPPORT CENTER OF BRAINERD MINNESOTA: $149,054 over 9y, 18% of budgetWindham Academy Public Charter School: $136,389 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetCOMMUNITY ACTION OF SOUTHEAST IOWA: $136,212 over 9y, 0.4% of budgetSOUTH CENTRAL LUTHERAN CAMP ASSOCIATION OF INDIANA INC: $134,158 over 9y, 4.9% of budgetTNKIDS NUTRITION: $126,930 over 1y, 6.8% of budgetLIFE LEGAL DEFENSE FOUNDATION: $126,363 over 2y, 3.6% of budgetTHE YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION OF THE CEDAR RAPIDS METROPOLITAN AREA: $126,029 over 7y, 1.2% of budgetJacksonville Main Street: $118,287 over 2y, 52% of budgetANDREWS UNIVERSITY: $117,257 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetFELLOWSHIP OF CHRISTIAN FARMNERS INTL: $116,030 over 9y, 14% of budgetHEROES CARE INC: $113,568 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetCENTRAL WV OUTREACH CENTER INC: $111,363 over 8y, 5.0% of budgetOperation Rally Point: $106,813 over 7y, 31% of budgetHERNANDO COUNTY EDUCATION DIRECT SUPPORT ORGANIZATION INC: $104,412 over 3y, 6.0% of budgetLIVING WATERS BIBLE CAMP INC: $104,253 over 9y, 6.1% of budgetGreat Lakes Bay Health Centers: $103,047 over 9y, 0.1% of budgetBOSSIER COUNCIL ON AGING INC: $89,713 over 7y, 4.4% of budgetPATHWAY SERVICES UNLIMITED INC: $86,190 over 9y, 0.5% of budgetPRAIRIE CENTER AGAINST SEXUAL ASSAULT: $83,124 over 2y, 4.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds RESOURCES EXCHANGE ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds CIS DEVELOPMENT FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHSTAR FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Native American Heritage Association ↗
  • Who funds UNITED BREAST CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE TEACHERS DESK INC ↗
  • Who funds GOSERVE ↗
  • Who funds Hand to Hand Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds YOUTH FAIR CHANCE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORD OF LIFE FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
  • Who funds STARDUST NON-PROFIT BUILDING SUPPLIES INC ↗
  • Who funds ENCHANTED PEACH CHILDREN'S FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BRIDGEWAY INC ↗
  • Who funds HIS FIRST FOUNDATION % JOHN S WIELAND ↗
  • Who funds BASKET OF HOPE ↗
  • Who funds VISTA CHRISTIAN RETREAT INC ↗
  • Who funds SUSIE QS KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds IREDELL COMMUNITY OUTREACH ↗
  • Who funds GIVING IN KINDNESS IN ARKANSAS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY CONNECTION COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS OF ATHENS INC ↗
  • Who funds LYNCHBURG CITY SCHOOLS EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

North Carolina High S…The George W Bush Fou…GenYOUTH IncorporatedKentucky Society for …Round It Up America I…Masonic Home of Misso…Polk County & Bolivar…Jobs for Kentucky's G…Project Lead the Way …Nc Greenpower Corpora…Nchsaa Foundation IncGood360
North Carolina High School Athletic Association IncNC15.8× affinity12 shared granteesties to 7 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: North Carolina High School Athletic Association Inc · The George W Bush Foundation · GenYOUTH Incorporated · Kentucky Society for Technology in Education · Round It Up America Inc · Masonic Home of Missouri · Polk County & Bolivar Charity Trust · Jobs for Kentucky's Graduates Inc · Project Lead the Way Inc · Nc Greenpower Corporation · Nchsaa Foundation Inc · Good360

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization National Association for the Exchange of Industrial Resources Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from National Association for the Exchange of Industrial Resources Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 16%
  • Lupa Game Farm Inc: 16% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
29report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to National Association for the Exchange of Industrial Resources Inc?

Find your warmest path to National Association for the Exchange of Industrial Resources Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 833 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2025) is on record and reports $65M of grant expense, but none of it to a named recipient. On a Form 990 that can mean grants abroad, filed by region only (Schedule F), grants under $5,000, which are not itemized, or a schedule referenced as an attachment the e-file does not carry. The figures above are therefore from FY2024, the most recent year this funder named its grantees.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on National Association for the Exchange of Industrial Resources’ filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home